"Pretty much all of them" is a cop out, and I take that as indicating that you don't actually know what any of Rowling's views are at all. I suspect that someone else (maybe even a lot of someone elses) told you that Rowling's views are anti trans, and you simply swallowed their interpretation as being accurate. I suspect you've never bothered to find out what Rowling's views are.
I have, and to you both directly and dear God repeatedly.
For the same reason you shouldn't (often by law) repeatedly comment on a gay man's sexuality against his wishes, and try to otherwise marginalize him. It doesn't matter what your personal views are. He's a person like the rest of us (IMV, YMMV) and reasonable accommodations are reasonable.
Name a gender critical speaker that has stood up at a rally and spoken. Then name one that has behaved the way you've claimed.
As I said, I even double checked her Wiki page and spot checked the citations. She professes exactly what I recall her professing.
And which of the views that wikipedia tells you are "anti trans" do you agree are anti trans? Just a couple of examples will be fine, I don't need a complete inventory.
I don't follow Rally Speaker news.
Refer to my earlier prediction and save us the bandwidth.
No. You made posts, but NONE of them actually came to terms with the fact that self-ID did in fact enable a sexual predator to enter changing rooms. The thing that never happens, happened.
That's not asking for me to accommodate him, that's asking for him to be left alone. Your inability to understand this distinction is yet another example of how shallow and incoherent your thinking on this entire topic is.
Nobody's trying to bait you. We are, however, trying to get you to actually provide a clear and direct answer. You made the claim that Rowling's views are anti trans. A reasonable person would expect you to be able to actually discuss one of Rowling's views that you find to be anti trans, and explain *why* you think it's anti trans.
Do you believe that a person's mind is magically beamed into their body, and their body is an empty vessel awaiting the installation of mind? Or anything substantially similar to that, on the presumption that you'll object to the specific words I've used rather than the concept embodied by them.She literally said no child is born in the wrong body. That extrapolates pretty inevitably to adults, unless an adult could be born in the wrong body, but not during their childhood? And if 'feels' was the problem, it cant be assessed on anything but the subjective feeling, soooooo...?
JK Rowling says ‘no child is born in the wrong body’
Harry Potter author insists there are ‘no trans kids’ but only adults believing in an ideology which will ‘wreak more harm than lobotomies’www.telegraph.co.uk
A sci-fi author wrote some fiction about it, it must be 100% true!
And without self ID policy, what would have happened? Pretty much the same thing. People got rightly freaked and called police. He wouldn't have been charged with Entering the Wrong Rest Room, because such a charge doesn't exist.
Left alone. Is that what you think you've been doing ITT for years, leaving them alone?
Sometimes you're so weirdly disconnected from the things you argue. Like here - you're either ignorant of or ignoring the context and meaning in which the originating claim was made... and then criticizing the response to that original claim on a false basis.
If a right-handed person tells you that they feel like they were born in the wrong body, because they identify as left-handed... what's your reaction to that?
Nah, Thermal just thinks we have the "wrong reasons" for objecting to males invading our intimate spaces, services, and sports. That's all. Of course, Thermal won't elaborate on what they believe those "wrong reasons" are... they merely assert that they're wrong.
What kind of a crossed wire are you imagining here?
Dude, you are OBJECTIVELY, MEASURABLY, OBSERVABLY left handed! Other people outside of your brain can INDEPENDENTLY CORROBORATE that you are left handed.
You are wrong in so many ways I don't even know where to start. You're also being intentionally insulting.
Humorous euphemisms aren't disrespectful. I regularly refer to wedding tackle, twig and giggle berries, dangly bits, panty parts, outies, external thermometers, morning sundials, and various other humorous euphemisms for penis and testicles. Similarly, I refer to axe wounds, roast beef sandwiches, man in the boat, wet cat, bearded clam, box, and pink taco in reference to vulvas.
Circling back to this, you're wrong. Rowling doesn't deny that someone can feel like they were born in the wrong body; Rowling denies that a person can be born in the wrong body.