• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Split Thread BBC news reporting

I know this forum was always a bit left-leaning in its membership - its one of the things that attracted me here in the first place, but I never thought I'd see the day when it would become so politically tribal - when people whom I respected (even if I sometimes disagreed with them) started using science denial, fact denial, character assassination, mudslinging and other techniques of conspiracy theorists in their claims and arguments.
No, it's always been like that.
 
Who's crying? I merely noted it.

Yeah, that's definitely how you, theprestige and smartcooky's posts come across for sure. It's absolutely not a temper tantrum.

Make no mistake, I encourage it. I love watching it. The forum hasn't changed at all but smartcooky is here yelling at everyone and he's made new friends while doing it, while, by his own claim, his old friends are betraying him. It's not that he's using right wing sources, or bleeds that dumb mother ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ thread into everything because his life revolves around transgender people. Nope, that can't be it. It's that everyone else is changing, everyone else is always the problem.

What a ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ joke.
 
I disagree

MB-Guardian.jpg
MB-Telegraph.jpg


Also, I'd like to point out that its really easy to be "accurate" when you completely suppress or don't report things at all. Take for example, the recent anti-Semitism incident at the University of Central London...


Of course the usual suspects will dismiss this out of hand because Telegraph something far right thugs something something racists something.

Here is the statement from the UCL President & Provost, Dr Michael Spence...


“I am utterly appalled by these heinous antisemitic comments. Antisemitism has absolutely no place in our university, and I want to express my unequivocal apology to all Jewish students, staff, alumni, and the wider community that these words were uttered at UCL.
“The individual responsible is a former fixed-term researcher at UCL, but not a current member of UCL staff. We have reported this incident to the police and have banned her from campus. We have launched a full investigation into how this happened and have banned the student group which hosted it from holding any further events on campus pending the outcome of this.
“Regrettably, like many UK universities, we continue to confront incidents of antisemitism and are committing to banishing this from our campus. We have initiated disciplinary proceedings against a number of students in relation to antisemitism and reported incidents to the police where appropriate.
“Freedom of speech and academic freedom are fundamental to university life, but they can never be misused as a shield for hatred. UCL remains steadfast in our commitment to ensure our campus is a safe, respectful, and inclusive environment for everyone.”

Reported in the Telegraph (15 hours ago at time of posting), The Times (12H), The Times if Israel (13H)

The Guardian? Crickets
The BBC? Crickets
The story won't have have comported with the their pro-Islam, pro-Palestine, anti-Israel chosen narratives. Its lying by omission!

As I said, its easy to claim accuracy and lack of bias in your reporting when you don't report things at all...
I can see two reasons why the BBC hasn't put this on atheir web site.

1) After their recent experience they may be reluctant to base a story based on selective and edited quotes from an anti-Palestinian pressure group.
2) It is a trivial story, someone who is a US citizen, not an employee of the godless college (UCL), gave a talk to a student group (Jews for Palersdtine, probably a few dozen students attended. It doesn't deserve to be a national news story. It is regrettable that the outcome is that a Jewish student group has been banned.
 
It doesn’t seem to have been run by many outlets, perhaps the question to ask is why the papers that did run it ran it?
 
I can see two reasons why the BBC hasn't put this on atheir web site.

1) After their recent experience they may be reluctant to base a story based on selective and edited quotes from an anti-Palestinian pressure group.
2) It is a trivial story, someone who is a US citizen, not an employee of the godless college (UCL), gave a talk to a student group (Jews for Palersdtine, probably a few dozen students attended. It doesn't deserve to be a national news story. It is regrettable that the outcome is that a Jewish student group has been banned.

It doesn't seem to have been picked up by the other major outlets either, left or right.

BTW: The unattributed screenshots seems to be from allsides.com which states "AllSides has low or initial confidence in this bias rating" on their Guardian page.
 
Last edited:
Yes, technically it is University College London, historically it was University College, University of London.
True, and more historically it was University College, London. Even more historically it was London University.

UCL predates the University of London.

It was never called the University College of London or the University of Central London.
 
True, and more historically it was University College, London. Even more historically it was London University.

UCL predates the University of London.

It was never called the University College of London or the University of Central London.
More ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ distration
WGAF what its actual title is.
 
Wasn't the complaint about inaccurate reporting?

Also, I am a pedant. I have never claimed otherwise.
The substance of the debate is the only thing that really matters. If someone gets spelling or grammar wrong, or they were not holding their tongue in the exact right way, it does NOT negate the substance or the facts a debate.

I wrote "University of Central London" instead "University College London"... SO ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ WHAT? The sources I posted had it correct, and I linked to the website of the actual college in question. Only a complete moron would lack the intelligence to work out the mistake and get it right!

Pedantry about spelling and grammar is a way to distract from the substance of the issue, usually because the pedant in question finds the topic uncomfortable, or the topic seriously impacts their deeply held dogmatic worldview, or they have nothing to bring to the table and they know it.
 
Last edited:
I can see two reasons why the BBC hasn't put this on atheir web site.

1) After their recent experience they may be reluctant to base a story based on selective and edited quotes from an anti-Palestinian pressure group.
The whole video haas been made available to any media who wants to see it.... so that excuse doesn't scan

2) It is a trivial story
It doesn't deserve to be a national news story.
Teaching anti-Semitism to students in a place of higher learning, in the UK's biggest city, and its capital, is a trivial story. Got it!
I would have thought with the current situation in Gaza, a story that involves spreading hatred of Jews at a University would be a story worth publishing for any media outlet

Of course, if the media outlet in question is pro-Islam, anti-Jewish and has for the last several years, stuck rigidly to a pro-Palestine - anti Israel narrative regardless of any evidence, then they may not wish to counter their own narrative. It could be embarrassing for them.

someone who is a US citizen
Irrelevant

not an employee of the godless college (UCL)
She is a former researcher at the college.

Some of her work is still listed on their website

gave a talk to a student group (Jews for Palersdtine, probably a few dozen students attended.
Anti-Semitism is just fine if you only share it with a few students... amirite!

It is regrettable that the outcome is that a Jewish student group has been banned.
That would be regrettable if it were true... fortunately, it is not true. They have understandably been barred from holding any more events until the investigation is completed. However, Dr Masqui has been banned, and rightly so.

“The individual responsible is a former fixed-term researcher at UCL, but not a current member of UCL staff. We have reported this incident to the police and have banned her from campus. We have launched a full investigation into how this happened and have banned the student group which hosted it from holding any further events on campus pending the outcome of this."
 
Last edited:

Back
Top Bottom