No, but I don't expect that you'll actually use your brain to consider this point at all.
Clearly Kirk did NOT call for Biden to be murdered - which is where this ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ started. It is a falsehood intended to stir up antagonism and hatred to frame it as such.
Speaking of not using your brain, care for a gold medal? Kirk said that Biden should be killed, but as others have pointed out, that's not a falsehood intended to stir up antagonism? You can't even see your hypocrisy through your "it's everyone else's job to bring the temperature down" nonsense...which seems to only be aimed at the left. Irony, right?
And in context it's quite clear that what Kirk implied was that Biden should be charged for whatever crimes Kirk imagined that Biden committed, and then be found guilty and given either life in prison or the death sentence.
And making up crimes to imply that Biden did something wrong on the level of deserving execution IS WHERE THIS ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ STARTED. Jesus tap dancing ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ Christ. You're so busy yelling at everyone here that you, and the rest of your 'free speech' buddies, aren't even crying about the right people. Meanwhile, you make up this ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ ludicrous claim that it's on everyone else because Kirk has the 'free speech' to say it...yet no one else apparently can criticize him because we're totally raising the temp? I can't even make up how stupid this is.
Nothing at all in that quote suggests that Kirk expects to be judge, jury, and executioner - as has been put forth here.
This completely contradicts what you just said about Kirk implying Biden should be charged and executed. He literally made up charges, by your own ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ admission, said that he was guilty, by your own ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ admission, and then said he should be imprisoned and\or put to death. What am I missing? Educated me oh savant of neutrality and bringing down the temp.
A reasonable and sensible reading does not support the hyperbolic narrative being pushed by people in this thread.
Right, 'reasonable and sensible' people call for the summary execution of a former POTUS because of....why again? Pull the other one, it's got bells on it.
Furthermore, me speaking out and saying that you guys are exaggerating Kirk's quotes in order to further exacerbate political division, and to further inflame anger and the likelihood of violence does NOT IN ANY RATIONAL WAY suggest that I agree with any of Kirk's views!
No one is exaggerating ◊◊◊◊, they're his own ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ words. You and the others are just dancing around as much as possible to give them a different context. You're justifying his calling for Biden's murder because, why again? It's totally not what he meant? Meanwhile, you're saying it's us that are inflaming anger? That's rich.
You're bashing your head against a wall. Progressives don't do nuance.
Hey, just give a shout when you want help off that high horse, K buddy! I'll go grab a ladder lol, what a ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ joke.
. Worst thing is, it's probably deliberate. Often the initial story is the one that sticks. If they can flood the zone with screaming about how the assassin/bomber/spree shooter was an illegal lesbian trans-woman globalist Obama-lover, that becomes the Truth in the heads of many trumpkins, regardlessly of what we learn later.
