Will tariffs make America great?

But I don’t think that’s accurate either. Businesses which have tariffs refunded but which won’t refund customers will not remain businesses for long.
That would be a fair way of thinking. But businesses in the USA are not fair. Far from it, they are inhumanly ruthless. A tax refund goes straight to their profit line as income, that's all. And they won't tell or compensate previous customers. The customers' only recourse is a class action law suit.
 
Just to reiterate: this tariff debacle will proceed depending entirely on how much personal profit Trump can make out of it. So far, it has been simply a way to manipulate the stock market, which he regularly benefits from.
 
That would be a fair way of thinking. But businesses in the USA are not fair. Far from it, they are inhumanly ruthless. A tax refund goes straight to their profit line as income, that's all. And they won't tell or compensate previous customers. The customers' only recourse is a class action law suit.
Sadly, you are probably right.
 
The SC will just sit on it. Maybe till the 2026 election.

I don’t think they will because Trump will demand certainty.

So let’s see if the SC has any balls at all. I doubt it, but live in hope that a combination of a touch of decency and respect for the law might see them throw out tariffs.
My guess is, the Supreme Court will write a very long and wordy decision that Republicans will interpret one way and Democrats will interpret another. Chaos will continue.
 
The Supreme Court might drag this out, but dragging this out would have serious economic effects as everyone waits to see whether the tariffs will go away.
[....]
That's one reason for Trump's characteristically over-the-top reaction to this ruling. ("If these Tariffs ever went away, it would be a total disaster for the Country.") Another reason: The Trump administration has been using these tariffs as a threat when negotiating with other countries. With the legality of those tariffs in serious question, the effectiveness of that threat is diminished.

Trump et al. have filed their 251-page appeal along with an 8-page motion to expedite. Omitting references, and with other omissions signalled by ellipses:
...the Solicitor General, on behalf of the President of the United States and other petitioners, respectfully requests that this Court expedite resolution of this case to the maximum extent feasible, given the enormous importance of quickly confirming the full legal standing of the President’s tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), and the urgent need for swift resolution. The en banc Federal Circuit's erroneous decision has disrupted highly impactful, sensitive, ongoing diplomatic trade negotiations, and cast a pall of legal uncertainty over the President’s efforts to protect our country by preventing an unprecedented economic and foreign-policy crisis.

As Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent explains in the enclosed declaration, the en banc Federal Circuit’s 7-4 ruling that the tariffs are unlawful, “though judicially stayed, raises legal uncertainty about [the President’s IEEPA] tariffs that gravely undermines the President’s ability to conduct real-world diplomacy and his ability to protect the national security and economy of the United States.” “The recent decision by the Federal Circuit is already adversely affecting ongoing negotiations. World leaders are questioning the President’s authority to impose tariffs, walking away from or delaying negotiations, and/or imposing a different calculus on their negotiating positions.” In addition, “[t]he longer a final ruling is delayed, the greater the risk of economic disruption.” “For example, delaying a ruling until June 2026 could result in a scenario in which $750 billion-$1 trillion in tariffs have already been collected, and unwinding them could cause significant disruption.” ....

The 251-page writ of certiorari (which I have not yet read) starts out by stating the two core questions:
1. Whether the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA)...authorizes the tariffs imposed by President Trump pursuant to the national emergencies declared or continued in Proclamation 10,886 and Executive Orders14,157, 14,193, 14,194, 14,195, and 14,257, as amended.

2. If IEEPA authorizes the tariffs, whether the statute unconstitutionally delegates legislative authority to the President.
 
I've been getting emails from a company called Evri saying that my parcel has been received from the printers but because the $800 de minimis exemption was removed, I need to pay additional duty fees. They didn't actually say what the "parcel" was, so I was leaning toward it being a phishing scam, and Google seemed to agree.
Then I thought, "Is it those books I just ordered from a UK publisher?" I checked my order on the publisher's site, and they were using Evri. I went to the Evri site through the publisher's link, and they had a payment request and an order number that matched my purchase. So not a scam after all.
Long story short, I payed an extra $13 on a $68 purchase, on top of the $23 international shipping I already paid.
 

quell surprise, but charges against cook were fabricated
But nobody knows fraud like Trump!
 
I've been getting emails from a company called Evri saying that my parcel has been received from the printers but because the $800 de minimis exemption was removed, I need to pay additional duty fees. They didn't actually say what the "parcel" was, so I was leaning toward it being a phishing scam, and Google seemed to agree.
Then I thought, "Is it those books I just ordered from a UK publisher?" I checked my order on the publisher's site, and they were using Evri. I went to the Evri site through the publisher's link, and they had a payment request and an order number that matched my purchase. So not a scam after all.
Long story short, I payed an extra $13 on a $68 purchase, on top of the $23 international shipping I already paid.
My sob story.

I was at a scientific conference in the US and entered for a draw for a set of physiology text books. I won, because of shipping costs they decided to send me the text books on CD rather than as books. Books are tax free in the UK, but CD get sales tax (VAT), so I ended paying around $75 for a CD, I wanted big impressive 3 volume text book with pictures not a CD.
 
My sob story.

I was at a scientific conference in the US and entered for a draw for a set of physiology text books. I won, because of shipping costs they decided to send me the text books on CD rather than as books. Books are tax free in the UK, but CD get sales tax (VAT), so I ended paying around $75 for a CD, I wanted big impressive 3 volume text book with pictures not a CD.

It also raises the question of whether you actually have a CD/DVD drive on your PC/Laptop these days
 

Back
Top Bottom