When you watch Alistair Campbell or Sophie Raworth reading the BBC News, you assume the stuff they're spouting is properly researched and authenticated. Rabe is one step beyond being a mouthpiece, she is the source of the researched and authenticated stuff you accept unthinkingly every day.
You’re not being abused. Focus the energy you’re expending on playing victim toward remembering what was previously discussed.
Where did I say Foot and Pilger were never wrong? I said they were proper investigative journalists, which Rabe clearly isn't. But bless you for patronising them.
It should be clear that my view is that the Rockwater divers took a special interest in the attaché case in cabin no. 6230. Why? because Frànsen the SEMI bod in charge of the whole Rockwater thing - not to mention hiring an expensive outfit with commercial divers rather than research ones, when Sweden has plenty of marine expert divers of its own, and at a cheaper tender - made it clear to the divers they were not to identify any of the bodies, What happened in cabin 6230? Voronin's name was spelt out. What's more, the diver suggested he could be the gentleman lying dead behind the door in the hallway. So, the fact, (a) they weren't looking to ID bodies and (b) nonetheless named Voronin, albeit indistinctly, and the supervisor was clearly asking someone higher up on the platform as to whether the name being called out 'rang a bell.' Ding, ding , ding.
Nope, asked and answered. You brought up the red-suited figure apropos of nothing. I provided evidence of that previously, which you continue to ignore. The members you name are doing the exhausting work of trying to get you to give actual evidence for the claim, instead of an endless runaround of lazy newspaper reports.
Read my response with care. I have spelt out exactly what I believe about Voronin in answer to your question did I think he was an arms/spacecraft trader. Nothing more, nothing less.
No, EHocking did.
No, you intimated you think they were looking for Voronin's case. That indicates you think there was A reason for it, but does not specify if you think he was dealing in space tech.
Again, false. You did in this post having to do with why the captain's body should have been recovered:
You said that the German Group of Experts was the source of your claims about Aleksandr Voronin's spacecraft related businesses. Please can we have a precise citation for that?
Also with a collision with an ekranoplan. Why is nobody taking this idea seriously?
OK, fair enough, so EHocking then wanted further clarification, so it then developed into an issue.Again, false. You did in this post having to do with why the captain's body should have been recovered:
@EHocking later asked you to substantiate it.
Second time having to remind you of this. You need to see someone for your memory problems. Whining that you're being so badly abused for your lapses is not the adult way to address such problems.
Why not just the regular news?
He’s not asking for “clarification.” He’s asking for substantiation that you seem unable to supply.
I have the substantiation in Andi Meister's book, as I said, or did you forget?
No you have a circular system of secondary and tertiary citations. They lead nowhere that constitutes actual evidence.
