That's just a piece that repeats Bollyn's claims. It isn't evidence for them.You can read more about Bollyn and the suitcase here:
Ida-Viru ärimehe salapärane kohver merepõhjas
Estonia pardalt üles toodud kohvri omanikku Aleksandr Voroninit ümbritseb salapära kui lääne ajakirjanikud on teinud temast võimsa relvaärika, siis Ida-Virus ei teata sellest vähimatki.www.postimees.ee
So you haven't read it and don't know what the claim is or even if it exists?
What did you want evidence of? This is how current affairs work. News report, Estonia accident being reinvestigated. The whys and wherefores, how, what and why, updated accordingly.
She has definitely been reported as having said it. You can research Süddeutsche Zeitung, dated Saturday prior to 24 Sept 2002, to see exactly what she said, if you are interested enough. How else does news work?
It's weirder that you decided that was a response to what I wrote.
So you haven't got any actual sources for any of the claims you post?
There you go again. You are the one telling us she said it yet you can't show us where she said it or exactly what she said, you just refer us to a report that she said something.
Erm, a poster named ReformedOfflian enquired about the audio for the Voronin attaché case. I supplied it. the interest in Voronin and his case is his, not mine. I was being helpful in giving him the link. Ask him why he is interested in it. I am only the inbetween.
The fact of her having said it exists. I provided the link. I am not sure why I am suddenly expected to be an expert on Voronin's life story.
Can we have a specific and precise citation for that, please?
No, you provided a report in a newspaper claiming she said it.
Claims of her having said it exist. You provide links to claims, typically without a chain of attribution which can be followed, and pretend not to realise there's a difference between these and direct quotations.
As a journalist, Rabe investigated the Estonia accident. Rabe was a part of the so-called German Group of Experts. She believed the Rockwater dive was just a front for the Swedish government because they already knew the cause of the accident, which in her view, was a Swedish submarine collision (and hence, classified information). She points out the fact the divers only visited deck six for specific cabins and made no attempt at all to look at the car deck, or identify the bodies on the bridge. Rabe as a journalist had the means to publicise it via her channel. DER SPEIGEL sponsored the Rabe-Bemis-Braidwood expedition. That is how it is relevant she worked for DER SPIEGEL. You know, like current affairs? Make of current affairs what you will.
Your claim he dealt in space craft tech for one.
That was the information Rabe imparted to Süddeutsche Zeitung, according to reputable news outlet, Postimees 24.9.2002.
Did you quote Postimees 24.9.2002 or did you quote some other source claiming they said that?
But there is no evidence for it., and his family have not only stated he never did so but that the brother he was reported to have never existed. So it can be discounted as Rabe making things up again.
Click on the Postimees link that takes you straight to their article.
I am only reporting current affairs news. That is what Jutta Rabe has publicised, as her researched views. And let's face it, both Rabe and the later film crew, Evertsson and Andersson, also found a hole in the hull, which was not mentioned at all by the JAIC. Yet even Meister mentions it. So yes, it needed an explanation, hence the reinvestigation, which has been news in the UK as well as in these northern realms. How do you know it's 'likely untrue'? That merely indicates a closed mind rather than someone armed with all of the facts, given that a serious journalist is hardly going to repeat such a controversial claim without a solid source for it.