The Great Zaganza
Maledictorian
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2016
- Messages
- 29,896
I think this hype over the shooting will make other big influencer look like jucier targets for someone who only seeks notoriety.
Just how well known outside of the terminally online was Charlie Kirk? Because all I see from people praising him are these vague statements about free speech and being a conservative activist. No one seems to pinpoint any specific actions or quotes from him that were insightful or intelligent or beneficial to society. But, there are plenty of examples of him saying some really vile and inflammatory things. There's the list he made of professors and students to target for harassment (and worse).
There was just nothing remarkable about him. He was a younger, louder, stupider Ben Shapiro. He was just another nondescript, mediocre, easily replaceable, shameless white guy with a billionaire sugar daddy. would someone really expect to get famous for shooting him?
Radio 4 played a clip of him "debating" last night.
A favoured tactic seemed to be asking folk to define "woman" without using the term "woman", but when he was asked to define "man", he would say, "You're looking at one!"
That isn't even at 8 year old levels of arguing...
He was a sexist, racist, islama/homo/transphobe christian nationalist shock jock. He will be lionized by the trumpublican party, and his murder will a rallying cry for further marginalization of anyone deemed left. The murderer will be labled leftist, inspired by leftist rhetoric. The cultists, and uniformed "independents" will eat this up.Indeed, eulogizing him as the intellectual and moral foundation of the MAGA movement isn't the flex his fans think it is.
Post #413. A thread has been merged, and it made more sense as a direct reply to the OP of that thread.What is this replying to?
It doesn't alter my view that it's stupid for anyone at all to expect EU Parliament to give a crap about any US activist.Dominik Tarczyński MEP
@D_Tarczynski
As conservatives, we requested a minute of silence in the European Parliament to honor Charlie Kirk. The left, calling themselves democrats, naturally refused. They are the same everywhere… Even in the face of death, they are incapable of showing human compassion. Therefore, I will organize an exhibition in the European Parliament commemorating Charlie Kirk. His legacy will bear fruit…
RELEASE THE ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ FILES!!Epstein? Epstein who?
I fear you are correct.I think this hype over the shooting will make other big influencer look like jucier targets for someone who only seeks notoriety.
Who's Rob Schneider?
"Influencer" is a stupid made up internet term for people who can sucker idiots into believing their pap. Anyone who's thinking is swayed by an "influencer" is a low grade imbecile.I think this hype over the shooting will make other big influencer look like jucier targets for someone who only seeks notoriety.
"Influencer" is a stupid made up internet term for people who can sucker idiots into believing their pap. Anyone who's thinking is swayed by an "influencer" is a low grade imbecile.
Now tell me something I don't know.well i got bad news for you, there's a ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ of people like that. millions upon millions upon millions.
propagandist would probably be a pre internet analogue to influencer
Now tell me something I don't know.
"Influencer" is a stupid made up internet term for people who can sucker idiots into believing their pap. Anyone who's thinking is swayed by an "influencer" is a low grade imbecile.
Although I have to admit to a degree of fascination, I thought 'Reality TV Star' was about as low as the human race could get. It makes you wonder what comes next..
This. I miss the time when blogs were people writing about their daily lives and whatever interested them. Now they (along with vlogs) are thinly veiled commercial channels."Influencer" is a stupid made up internet term for people who can sucker idiots into believing their pap. Anyone who's thinking is swayed by an "influencer" is a low grade imbecile.
Just checked a Norwegian editorial about how the Norwegian papers (at least some of them) are referring to him as 'conservative', as opposed to far-right. Not sure if anyone will be able to open this, but here's the translated version. It has an excellent rundown of the horrible things he said, too.
Also note the comments thread, where the usual suspects are out in force to gaslight. He was just a moderate who wanted debate, dontchaknow, and whoever calls him a racist are just meanies who can't tolerate disagreement.
I note they never say that when the left utters controversial opinions.
This. I miss the time when blogs were people writing about their daily lives and whatever interested them. Now they (along with vlogs) are thinly veiled commercial channels.
I believe it was a reply to Lisbeth's original, and now merged post about how we didn't want to talk about the shooting of Charlie Kirk, even though there was already a couple threads about it.What is this replying to?