Trump's Second Term

Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth
@SecDef
I’m proud to announce that Moses Ezekiel’s beautiful and historic sculpture — often referred to as “The Reconciliation Monument” — will be rightfully be returned to Arlington National Cemetery near his burial site.
It never should have been taken down by woke lemmings. Unlike the Left, we don’t believe in erasing American history—we honor it.
The South will rise agin!
 
The White House
@WhiteHouse
President Trump has been awarded a full set of 1984 Olympic medals. 🏅🇺🇸

Did he even ask for them?

Did they have a spare set just lying around from 1984, and someone thought, "We need to clean this cabinet out. I know! Let's give a set to Dear Leader Trump!"

Also, someone please watch what he does with them. They will either be mounted on the Oval Office mantelpiece with his name on them prominently, or he will melt them down for the bullion value and by bitcoin.
 
Did he even ask for them?

Did they have a spare set just lying around from 1984, and someone thought, "We need to clean this cabinet out. I know! Let's give a set to Dear Leader Trump!"

Also, someone please watch what he does with them. They will either be mounted on the Oval Office mantelpiece with his name on them prominently, or he will melt them down for the bullion value and by bitcoin.
Wait until the next phase and he will put them on his uniform along with his Silver Star and his Order of Lenin and his Junior GI police badge.
 
Did he even ask for them?

Did they have a spare set just lying around from 1984, and someone thought, "We need to clean this cabinet out. I know! Let's give a set to Dear Leader Trump!"

Also, someone please watch what he does with them. They will either be mounted on the Oval Office mantelpiece with his name on them prominently, or he will melt them down for the bullion value and by bitcoin.
I'm intruiged by the use of the term 'awarded'. Sure, he's been given a set of medals, but I would have though only the IOCC can actually award medals. Slightly pedantic I know, but it's the internet!

Quite why medals from 1984 have any relevance to the 2028 games is slightly beyond me, but hey, let no opportunity to smooch butt pass you by I guess...
 
Kevin Hassett suggests the Bureau of Labor Statistics rigged the 2012 election for Barack Obama

That's a pretty bold accusation, against probably identifiable individuals. He'd better have some actual evidence covering his ass for saying that.

Those overeager to kiss Trump's ring by flinging accusations at supposed opponents might do well to remember how Rudi Giuliani got carried away like that and lost a $148 million defamation lawsuit.
 
That's a pretty bold accusation, against probably identifiable individuals. He'd better have some actual evidence covering his ass for saying that.

Those overeager to kiss Trump's ring by flinging accusations at supposed opponents might do well to remember how Rudi Giuliani got carried away like that and lost a $148 million defamation lawsuit.
I was thinking the same thing. He might find himself on the wrong end of a billion dollar law suit if he isn't careful. See if he smirks when Trump disowns him.
 
Quite why medals from 1984 have any relevance to the 2028 games is slightly beyond me
The 2028 Olympics will be held in Los Angeles, and the last time they were held there was 1984. Not really a mystery.
 
Nancy Pelosi's daughter was present in the halls of Congress on January 6, 2021 and filmed her Mother and others being evacuated. Below is a link to a CBS News report that includes some of Alexandra Pelosi's video.

View attachment 62773
Well that's weird. Now Kash Patel sounds even more manipulative - using clever framing to make a point while trying to keep outright lies to a minimum. Her daughter happened to be there filming, which is plausible to me. I wrote a biography of my mother when she turned 80. As far as I can tell, Pelosi's daughter was documenting a key day in Congress, when the vote was to be certified. Sometimes when you're covering an expected event, unscheduled "breaking news" starts to happen. I listened to the Kash Patel clip several times trying to make sure I quoted him accurately and I gotta say, he knows how to package a nothing burger. She's "filming a movie on Jan. 6" is sort of true. As in, her daughter, and probably a crew, was/were filming the day of the vote certification, and when everyone was being evacuated obviously you keep the camera rolling.

He uses her somewhat grumpy nonchalance as evidence that she wasn't afraid of the mob, therefore it was staged. No, I think that's just the way she is. I'm not a student of her, but being grumpily stoic can absolutely be a defense against fear. Or she just wasn't feeling it.

A couple of months ago I had defibrillator pads on my chest and the doctor asking if I gave consent to being resuscitated. I said, grouchily, "That depends. ... not if my brain has't had oxygen for 5 minutes." She said they'd be doing CPR so I said OK. In the moment I had no fear. The defibrillator said "no shock indicated" so they tried a a bolus of adenosine. They said if I felt a sense of impending doom, don't worry about it. No sense of doom descended but my eyes were locked on the monitor. A couple of seconds later my heart rate (pushing 200 bpm) started to fall. I waited a beat and said, "It's working" and they asked, "Can you feel it?" I said "No, I'm looking at the monitor." They laughed.

Deadpan gallows humor. Pelosi seems pretty tough and maybe that's just how she copes.
 
Last edited:
That's a pretty bold accusation, against probably identifiable individuals. He'd better have some actual evidence covering his ass for saying that.

Those overeager to kiss Trump's ring by flinging accusations at supposed opponents might do well to remember how Rudi Giuliani got carried away like that and lost a $148 million defamation lawsuit.
Well, yes and no. Have the injured parties seen a penny of that judgement? Has Giuliano actually paid anything towards the judgement?
 
Deadpan gallows humor. Pelosi seems pretty tough and maybe that's just how she copes.

On top of what you've stated, some people just aren't the panicky type. It's not like freaking out would have done her much good, and it couldn't have been a complete shock the riot was going to happen. I'd wager she watched the stupid ◊◊◊◊ give his speech, saw the crowd getting wound up, and then was informed they were moving to the Capitol Building. They were literally moving around a gallows for Christ's sake. I just don't find it to be that odd at all.
 
There's a MAGA version of the US constitution now??
As a matter of fact, there is. It's the original text, the one without all those pesky, after the fact, amendments past ten. Find a Trump Bible and have a look at the Constitution that's included, it isn't the one that's currently in effect.
It gets worse.

The US Congress maintains a web page that purports to show the text of the US Constitution.

I invite everyone to compare that web page's version of Article I, Sections 9 and 10, to the corresponding sections of the actual US Constitution. (Warning: That PDF is on a web page maintained by the US House of Representatives. At this point, I would not be greatly surprised if the House's version of the Constitution is altered to match the version mangled by the full Congress.)

The version currently displayed by the full Congress omits Sections 9 and 10 of Article I. This omission was accomplished by truncating Article I at the end of the 12th paragraph of Section 8, which has 18 paragraphs.

The omitted Section 9 contains language such as the following:
The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it.
No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law; and a regular Statement and Account of the Receipts and Expenditures of all public Money shall be published from time to time.
The Trump administration has been violating both of those provisions. The administration's Secretary of Homeland Security doesn't even know what habeas corpus means.

It is of course possible that Congress's truncation of Article I was some kind of innocent technical error. On the other hand, that seems unlikely because the text of the Constitution has not changed, so there has been no reason to edit the web pages that contained an accurate text of the Constitution until Trump took office.

Edited to add this second spoiler:
Congress's web page has been edited within the past hour or so. Article I is now truncated at the end of the 17th paragraph of Section 8. Sections 9 and 10 of Article I are still missing in their entirety.
 
Last edited:
Yes, and yes.
We don't know that. We know that a satisfaction of judgement was filed but we don't know the terms. The injured parties may not have received anything (but be "satisfied" that he agreed not to defame them again) and/or any cash settlement may not have come out of his pocket. According to the Reuters report....

"Terms have not been disclosed, but Giuliani said after the settlement that he would keep his apartment on Manhattan's Upper East Side, his condominium in Palm Beach, Florida, and his personal belongings. He promised not to defame the plaintiffs again."

So Giuliani doesn't seem to have suffered financially.
 
Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth
@SecDef
I’m proud to announce that Moses Ezekiel’s beautiful and historic sculpture — often referred to as “The Reconciliation Monument” — will be rightfully be returned to Arlington National Cemetery near his burial site.
It never should have been taken down by woke lemmings. Unlike the Left, we don’t believe in erasing American history—we honor it.

Well, the "Left" certainly wouldn't reveal that Robert E Lee affected a comic Irish accent while ordering his troops not to attack uphill at Gettysburg.
 
We don't know that. We know that a satisfaction of judgement was filed but we don't know the terms. The injured parties may not have received anything (but be "satisfied" that he agreed not to defame them again) and/or any cash settlement may not have come out of his pocket. According to the Reuters report....

"Terms have not been disclosed, but Giuliani said after the settlement that he would keep his apartment on Manhattan's Upper East Side, his condominium in Palm Beach, Florida, and his personal belongings. He promised not to defame the plaintiffs again."

So Giuliani doesn't seem to have suffered financially.

You can believe whatever you want but there is no intelligent reason to think that these two women won a $148 million judgement against him and decided to walk away empty handed. The AI summary I read said that they agreed to let him keep his stuff for an undisclosed amount of money, which seems entirely more reasonable than just throwing their hands up and saying, "Well, he said he wouldn't do it again, so I guess we're cool."

Either way, if they agreed to let him off the hook then that's their choice and they have every right to it.
 

Back
Top Bottom