• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Transwomen are not Women - Part 15

The steps to the Gryffindor girls' dormitories magically reject male entrants based on sex-at birth.

That's priceless. But I did actually post JKRs actual hate speech words so that @acbytesla could explain where the hate was. He has not responded.

Since @acbytesla can't find it, here's Joanne Rowling's original tweet that sparked off the tsunami of hate against her as a transphobe.


There is also a very thoughtful article explaining her position in detail. You won't find a word of hate in it.


Recently she has become quite sarky though.
 
How? Telekinesis? If you don't have force of law, you have nothing.

Great. Rely on the Jedi Mind Trick.

Reason and law.

Fortunately, I do have force of law, and that has very recently been confirmed. So yes, I rely on both reason (if men go into a women-only space, it ceases to be a women-only space), and the law, which has recently been upheld.
 
It's worthless without force of law.
Do you understand the legal concept of trespass? It doesn't seem like you do.
What are they going to do? No enforcement, no teeth, and we are right back where we are now.
Oh, you can have legal enforcement. But there are legal options besides "do nothing" and "criminalize any entry". But you're pretending that there aren't.
 
Fortunately, I do have force of law,
Ya that was that niggly little distinction that I'm making. That you said you didn't have or even want. Productive day, today.
and that has very recently been confirmed. So yes, I rely on both reason (if men go into a women-only space, it ceases to be a women-only space), and the law, which has recently been upheld.
That is my understanding, yes.
 
Do you understand the legal concept of trespass? It doesn't seem like you do.

Oh, you can have legal enforcement. But there are legal options besides "do nothing" and "criminalize any entry". But you're pretending that there aren't.

You ask the man to leave, politely. If he refuses, you call management, and possibly security. If he still refuses then he's trespassing, and if he gets really stroppy it turns into a breach of the peace. I wonder if many will take it that far? Quite telling that all the TRAs seem to assume that these men will simply refuse to behave decently when asked, though.
 
Unfortunate/Delusional? Which is it? Do you have compassion for them or not?
It's not an either or. I can have compassion for people with delusions, without having to affirm their delusion.

My sibling is bipolar, and until their meds got sorted and they got the right kind of therapy, their condition often presented with delusions. Never stopped me from loving them, nor from being compassionate for their plight... but I also didn't agree with them that their spouse and mine were lying about camping in the middle of the desert so they could stargaze and were instead cheating on us.
 
Do you understand the legal concept of trespass? It doesn't seem like you do.
Yes, and I understand it's force of law very well.
Oh, you can have legal enforcement. But there are legal options besides "do nothing" and "criminalize any entry". But you're pretending that there aren't.
Sure. A hearty finger wag. Ringing a Bobby who might get there after the transwoman has peed, washed her hands, maybe touched up her eyeshadow, and has casually strolled along halfway down the block.
 
No, you obviously don't. It's not a crime to be trespassed.
Yet it quickly can become so, and alternate charges that mean effectively 'trespassing is a crime' are euphamized willy nilly. "With intent to..." is a popular generic one.

Eta: here is a good discussion on how it is not at all criminal:


D2, Ziggurat. Come on, D2...
 
Last edited:
Fair point. I leave you to your ritual suicide thread.
I think it's a fair question to ask anyone who wants to substitute sex-segregation with segregation by self-identification why it would be okay to ask cisgender men to leave the ladies room, and I've seen more than one interlocutor die of rhetorical seppuku making the valiant but doomed attempt to formulate an answer which tallies with their own worldview.
 
Last edited:
I think it's a fair question to ask anyone who wants to substitute sex-segregation with segregation by self-identification why it would be okay to ask cisgender men to leave the ladies room, and I've seen more than one interlocutor die of rhetorical seppuku making the valiant but doomed attempt to formulate an answer which tallies with their own worldview.
I agree, oblique as I may have been throughout the thread, which is why I dislike self ID and favor clarifying the sex/gender line ASAP
 
Which study is the one you are referring to in the last paragraph? The one I am aware of is the one below, which controlled for sexual orientation and found that transgender participants had sex-typical values in most brain regions after controlling for sexual orientation, but were distinguished in regions related to processing self-perception.

Burke, S. M., Manzouri, A. H., & Savic, I. (2017). Structural connections in the brain in relation to gender identity and sexual orientation. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 17954.
I give it good odds this is the one. It was pretty much the only one that had good controls in place, and the difference observed was specific to self-perception processing.
 

Back
Top Bottom