The Gospel

God killed you idiot!

Do you think all those little firstborn's felt no pain at all.

eh....

EH...

loving god?

whatever
 
I think Edge did a wonderful job posting info that is greatly needed to wake some of you up to reality. God is not only real but very much alive and active in our world.
All of creation sings His praises! Thankyou Edge for all this info. you have shared. I know I really appreciate it!

Oh and Tricky just for your info I do not think I need anyone but Jesus to defend me, although I do appreciate having another believer on board. And he's so well educated too! I thank God for you Edge, and all my other brothers and sisters in Christ!!

The Edge is insane. I mean Pat Robertson insane; or Jimmy Swaggart insane.
 
Um... you do realize that he didn't write most of that stuff don't you.

He denys Newton's laws of physics. Everybody who is a Christian is not automatically your supporter, Kathy.
Even if Edge didn't right most of those articles I thought they were very good.

And if you are referring to Issac Newton? I don't know much about him. But I do have a question for you if you know his theories? Someone shared that Newton predicted the 2nd coming of Christ would be somewhere between the year 2005 and 2050...have you ever heard this?...
This person was replying to a statement made on another forum discussing the DiVinci Code....this is mentioned as Browns Error...
Sir Isaac Newton was a secret “Goddess Worshipper”. Yet it is well known that he was a devout Christian …who wrote a commentary on the book of Daniel and Revelation and calculated the physical return of Christ between the years 2000 and 2050
 
Last edited:
And if you are referring to Issac Newton? I don't know much about him. But I do have a question for you if you know his theories? Someone shared that Newton predicted the 2nd coming of Christ would be somewhere between the year 2005 and 2050...have you ever heard this?



You'll have to provide a source for that claim.

No one I have ever talked to other than you has made that claim.
 
That should keep you busy for a while.
Tip of the iceburg.



1) I asked for a scientific study that proves ID, you did not provide it.
2) Please reread the membership agreement for this forum about rule 4 and fair use copyright.
3) you have no provided anything that has proven anyone here wrong.
4) all you did was spam.

Feel better now that you spammed?
 
Um... you do realize that he didn't write most of that stuff don't you.

He denys Newton's laws of physics. Everybody who is a Christian is not automatically your supporter, Kathy.
Even if Edge didn't right most of those articles I thought they were very good.

And if you are referring to Issac Newton? I don't know much about him. But I do have a question for you if you know his theories? Someone shared that Newton predicted the 2nd coming of Christ would be somewhere between the year 2005 and 2050...have you ever heard this?

Sigh, Newton dabled in alchemy and astrology. His Laws of Motion have been used continually to better understand the world around us and has affected our lives tremendously. His "Principia" is a great scientific literature accomplishment. Too bad he didn't but the prediction of Christ 2nd coming in THAT work.

His alchemist and astrologists pursuits have born zero fruit. His religious beliefs have done nothing to advance the cause of humanity.
 
Did you really think he would?

or could?



I am more than happy to examine peer reviewed scientific studies that he thinks proves ID.

I've been waiting for this since ID showed up. I am sure I'll continue to wait.
 
I think Edge did a wonderful job posting info that is greatly needed to wake some of you up to reality. God is not only real but very much alive and active in our world.
All of creation sings His praises! Thankyou Edge for all this info. you have shared. I know I really appreciate it!

Oh and Tricky just for your info I do not think I need anyone but Jesus to defend me, although I do appreciate having another believer on board. And he's so well educated too! I thank God for you Edge, and all my other brothers and sisters in Christ!!
<sigh> While I can't say I haven't lobbed the occasional smart-aleck post at you, on the whole I think I've tried to engage you in civil discourse. Although I disagree with the majority of what you post I've tried to make logical arguments and treat you with a degree of courtesy.

But you try my patience, kathy. You really do.

What you fail to see is this: we understand that your faith makes you happy. We really do get that point. But when you repeat that point over and over and over and over. . . well hopefully you can see why some of us find it annoying.

What's worse is that the repetition is so unnecessary. Christians are not unwelcome here. Some, like RoadToad and kittynh are well liked and respected, and one reason for this is they don't ram their faith down our throats at every opportunity.

Kathy, every time I read your posts I think of Matthew 6:5-6
When thou prayest, thou shalt not be as the hypocrites are: for they love to pray standing in the synagogues and in the corners of the streets, that they may be seen of men. Verily I say unto you, They have their reward.

But thou, when thou prayest, enter into thy closet, and when thou hast shut thy door, pray to thy Father which is in secret; and thy Father which seeth in secret shall reward thee openly.
You come here and shout your faith in our faces, and I really think a large portion of your reason for doing so is to say "Look at me! I'm doing battle with the unbelievers! What a great Christian I am!" You're here so that you "may be seen of men."

Well Kathy, I'm going to ask you nicely. Please stop. You don't need to stop posting, but please follow the example of RT and kittynh: you can comment on the topics at hand without jamming your faith down our throats. Don't expect us to accept your faith as proof of anything. I for one don't believe that the Bible is the word of God, so I'm not going to accept its words as authoritative on anything.

I don't know if any of this is going to do any good, but what the hey, it's my time to spend. Kathy, talk with us, argue with us, maybe even let your hair down and joke with us and you'll find things go a lot easier. Keep preaching every time you sit down at your keyboard and you're very soon going to find backs turning and Ignore buttons being hit every time you come around. It's a lonely path you're choosing.
 
Fascinating

http://choicesforliving.com/spirit/part3/newton.htm

The second coming should be 2003-2007?

"If this is correct, Newton seems to say that Christ will return in power from A.D. 2003 to 2007, after the tribulation. This is closely compatible with the Bible calculations of other astute students that place the event in this approximate time frame. Depending upon one’s understanding, this could place the rapture of the church anytime before then. (I have discovered that a few prophecy students have arrived at this same interpretation of Daniel 9:25 before they discovered it was also Newton's idea.)

It was formerly thought that Newton merely meant to add 49 years to the declaration of Israel’s rebirth in 1947 or 1948, causing us to arrive at 1996 or 1997 for the Lord’s return, but that was obviously incorrect. A recheck of his book on Daniel revealed that Newton was referring to sabbath years."
 
I don't know who this Phelps fellow is, but if he's any worse than the aforementioned, I need to look him up. Religion is a mental disease; but one that is curable.


Go to Wikipedia. search for Fred Phelps. Read.

My favorite part is his shotgunning a boy's dog for crapping on his lawn.
 
Well I still have to believe what God's word says about no one knows the day or the hour but God Himself. I have had a hard time trying to understand why people try to predict His coming when we are told it is not for us to know.??

Are you saying Newton wasted his time. Then why bring him up?
 
Kathy, Edge provides you with no benefits. His spamming the thread with voluminous quotes from questionable sources limits the value of his input. Your agreeing with him limits the value of your input.
Well put bluess!
 

Back
Top Bottom