Then why did you bring up her immigrant history?
And she's an American citizen of African ancestry. That makes her an African American. She is also an American citizen of Indian ancestry, making her an Indian American.
Actually I'd be willing to bet that it's a very big deal for many African American women to see a woman of African ancestry so close to the nomination for a presidential campaign, especially to those who lived through Southern legal segregation. It's also probably a big deal to people of Indian descent, and Asian descent in general, especially women of those groups. It's even a big deal to me to think that my young daughter might get to see a woman finally occupy the Executive Office. Hell, this should be a big deal to pretty much anyone in the United States who isn't a white man.
Again, for someone who claims not to care about someone's immigrant ancestors, you're trying curiously hard to make a big deal out of it.
Like Donald Trump?
I'm sure it does. And I'm equally sure that you're baffled by that. Maybe if you'd actually concentrated on (what I'll charitably call) arguments about merit instead of making it about her being a child of immigrants, claiming she isn't really African American (she is), and trying to tarnish her as a descendant of slave owners when a large number of African Americans are just that due to the practice of raping slaves, you would have a leg to stand on. But you brought those things up.
