Cont: Luton Airport Car Park Fire part II

[catsmate]

Alexander Dennis supplier of the said buses? That one? 'Switch off the HVAC when leaving the bus unattended'. What does that even mean as surely a warning beep goes off if you fail to switch everything off or not shut the doors properly. The London buses make a terrific racket whilst lowering the ramp for wheelchairs. So the issue with the HVAC is a lot more than just 'switch it off', it means it has to be literally disabled in an extraordinary measure, user manual required as to how to do this.

Deeply reassuring to the public, I am sure.

"Well he would, wouldn't he?" ~ Mandy Rice-Davies

Again, you're spewing rubbish.

 

[Vixen]

You have yet to link to an article that actually says that. Now would be a good time to do so.


You appear to be hallucinating again.

Please explain your language.

 

[erwinl]

Please explain your language.

I think that should be clear.

You do have a habit of reading things, then interpreting them wrong and writing your incorrect interpretation in a post here.
Then upon rereading that post (by yourself, or via a quote form another member), you incorrectly assume that what is written there were the exact words in the original, instead of being your interpretation of it.

That is the hallucination.

That in combination with a strange reluctance of ever showing your sources.
Well, not so strange, because whenever you do show one of your source, it invariably does not say, whatever it is, that you took from it.

 

[Mojo]

Notandum: as an aside, I was in London recently and these buses are so cheaply made I could barely get my legs in and had to perform advanced yoga just to sit down.

Do you, by any chance, sometimes go under the name "Angelina Imden"?

 

[Vixen]

I think that should be clear.

You do have a habit of reading things, then interpreting them wrong and writing your incorrect interpretation in a post here.
Then upon rereading that post (by yourself, or via a quote form another member), you incorrectly assume that what is written there were the exact words in the original, instead of being your interpretation of it.

That is the hallucination.

That in combination with a strange reluctance of ever showing your sources.
Well, not so strange, because whenever you do show one of your source, it invariably does not say, whatever it is, that you took from it.

Sorry, I thought the days of playground name-calling were long gone. Reminds me of when I was seven, the worst insult you could think of was, 'You're mad' or 'Go back to Shenley'. But do you know what, it is no longer politically correct to use ableist language and I tend to agree that it is not appropriate language use for an adult.

You have your opinion I have mine. I can spot the difference between PR and propaganda and actual facts, and recognise it for what it is. Name-calling doesn't change my opinion. You cannot force people to agree with you.

I should add, I am anti-air pollution and welcome fresh air initiatives. That doesn't mean to say that we should ignore safety hazards just because someone with an agenda doesn't want anyone questioning them.

 

[Mojo]

I can spot the difference between PR and propaganda and actual facts, and recognise it for what it is.

Your posting history provides powerful evidence against this assertion.

 

[Vixen]

Your posting history provides powerful evidence against this assertion.

Citation, please.

 

[Mojo]

Citation, please.

Well, for a recent example how about page 29 of this thread, where you regurgitated the Daily Mail's talking points?

 

[Vixen]

Well, for a recent example how about page 29 of this thread, where you regurgitated the Daily Mail's talking points?

What is the point you are making?

 

[Mojo]

What is the point you are making?

This one:

I can spot the difference between PR and propaganda and actual facts, and recognise it for what it is.

Your posting history provides powerful evidence against this assertion.

The one you had asked me to provide a citation for only 21 minutes earlier, remember?

 

[Vixen]

This one:






The one you had asked me to provide a citation for only 21 minutes earlier, remember?

How does that prove the medical disability of hallucination?

 

[Mojo]

I can spot the difference between PR and propaganda and actual facts, and recognise it for what it is.

Your posting history provides powerful evidence against this assertion.

Citation, please.

Or how about here, where you misidentified propaganda published by Hermann Goering as a report from a Times reporter who had infiltrated the German front lines?

 

[Mojo]

How does that prove the medical disability of hallucination?

It was a response to your request for a citation to support this:

I can spot the difference between PR and propaganda and actual facts, and recognise it for what it is.

Your posting history provides powerful evidence against this assertion.

Your further responses betray a lack of reading comprehension ability that fatally undermines your claim of an ability to "spot the difference between PR and propaganda and actual facts".

ETA: or possibly you were actually hallucinating.

 

[Mojo]

Seriously, if you think "I can spot the difference between PR and propaganda and actual facts, and recognise it for what it is" is a statement about "the medical disability of hallucination" you are clearly unqualified to assess any statement written in English.

 

[Vixen]

It was a response to your request for a citation to support this:


Your further responses betray a lack of reading comprehension ability that fatally undermines your claim of an ability to "spot the difference between PR and propaganda and actual facts".

ETA: or possibly you were actually hallucinating.

Here is the NHS definition of hallucination. Do you still consider it appropriate use of language to use as an insult?

 

[wollery]

Here is the NHS definition of hallucination. Do you still consider it appropriate use of language to use as an insult?

Mojo isn't the one who talked about hallucination.

You're responding to two different posters and getting them and their arguments mixed up.

 

[Andy_Ross]

Notandum: as an aside, I was in London recently and these buses are so cheaply made I could barely get my legs in and had to perform advanced yoga just to sit down.

What does the operator's choice of seat spacing have to do with them being cheaply made or not?

 

[zooterkin]

Please explain your language.

You keep making statements which you claim are based on one source or another, but when you actually share that source, they do not say what you claimed they did. Are you intentionally misrepresenting the source, failing to understand what you read, or do you honestly think they said something different from what they actually do? The latter seems to be accurately characterised as hallucination.

 

[Steve]

What does the operator's choice of seat spacing have to do with them being cheaply made or not?

You dare to question an expert in bus construction? That is just one more of Vixen's amazingly diverse talents.

 

[Mojo]

You keep making statements which you claim are based on one source or another, but when you actually share that source, they do not say what you claimed they did. Are you intentionally misrepresenting the source, failing to understand what you read, or do you honestly think they said something different from what they actually do? The latter seems to be accurately characterised as hallucination.

Vixen clearly thinks that I've posted something that I haven't.