• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Shutdown 2023

What a silly and dishonest comment.

I never said anything about giving the GOP everything they want, or even 50% of what they want.

But of course it's better for you to make believe that I did, otherwise your argument kind of fails.

no, you said to give them something they didn't even ask for.

stop attacking me, personally, and actually discuss the topic for a change.
 
I agree that Republicans probably don't see a shutdown as the worst thing, but I think the split between the MAGA wing and McCarthy is probably genuine. This is only the most recent scrap in a long series.

.... yeah sure take it that way it you want. Keep playing the game. At this point it's just fun to watch.
 
.... yeah sure take it that way it you want. Keep playing the game. At this point it's just fun to watch.

It is interesting to see how meta Republican obstruction has become. Not content to stymy Democratic administrations, now a sub-party of the Republican party is gleefully sabotaging the rest of the party.

It's fractal intentional dysfunction.

Seems an unavoidable outcome of a party deliberately pandering for decades to the worst "government can't do anything and shouldn't try" impulses in our society. Reaping, sowing, etc.

It's a real bummer, but the Republicans keep proving that "make government such a nightmare that nobody but us is willing to deal with it" seems to be a winning strategy, from the humblest school board to the highest legislative bodies in the nation. The persistence hunting version of politics, eventually normal people will become exhausted from dealing with the never-ending torrent of nonsense and disengage.
 
Last edited:
scratch a liberal and a fascist bleeds.
If we can persuade enough Democrats to adopt such a black-and-white worldview, perhaps they too can produce utterly dysfunctional gridlock in whichever of the two legislative chambers they happen to control at any given time.
 
If we can persuade enough Democrats to adopt such a black-and-white worldview, perhaps they too can produce utterly dysfunctional gridlock in whichever of the two legislative chambers they happen to control at any given time.

power concedes nothing without a demand. Go along to get along is not really a great way to get what you want, even if it makes people like you more.

Say what you will about the far-right in the Republican party being evil and stupid and all the other correct criticisms of them, they are proving themselves to be very capable political operators. They punch way above their weight class. There's lessons to be learned that apply even outside their reactionary, neo-fascist worldview.
 
Last edited:
Well Republicans have always been better at "the game" because they don't have the shame to just not see screwing with people's lives as a game.
 
Last edited:
Well Republicans have always been better at "the game" because they don't have the same to just not see screwing with people's lives as game.

I see it as more that the conservative ideology is more compatible with the rampant corruption that runs this country. Dems are often dealing with conflicts of interests between their supposed liberal values and the interests of the moneyed classes that Republicans generally don't have to worry about because they are openly and proudly illiberal.
 
Last edited:
Well Republicans have always been better at "the game" because they don't have the shame to just not see screwing with people's lives as a game.

It is also asymmetrical. The Republicans aren't trying to use the federal government to advance a Republican agenda. Dismantling the federal government is the Republican agenda.
 
As I have said many times you have to work hard to become a master of chess. It's piss easy to become a master of "flip the board over."
 
You have to presume any compromise will mean Democrats signing off on further erosion of our already meager social safety net in this country, which seems an especially bad move considering the current economic precarity.

Childhood poverty doubled as a result of the ending of Covid era benefits programs, for example. Really can't see how Biden being the poverty President is good for his re-election chances



https://time.com/6313242/child-poverty-rate-2022-census/

But poverty is a nessacary evil, like homelessness for the glory of capitalism. So it is downright un-American to fight poverty instead of fighting the poor.
 
Yeah, screw all the Jews and others who died in the Holocaust since the Nazis took power!! Theirs was a worthy sacrifice.


;)

Look we stood up to the nazis about the jews in 1939, we definitively said we don't want your jews they are your problem you find a solution. I mean no one in the west cared when it was happening why pretend differently now?
 
Look we stood up to the nazis about the jews in 1939, we definitively said we don't want your jews they are your problem you find a solution. I mean no one in the west cared when it was happening why pretend differently now?

Not everyone in the west didn't care! They sent thoughts and prayers.
 
But poverty is a nessacary evil, like homelessness for the glory of capitalism. So it is downright un-American to fight poverty instead of fighting the poor.

what incentive does someone have to work below subsistence wage if they are not currently starving?
Clearly, too many food stamps means not enough people desperate to work for a pittance.
How is a CEO supposed to make his bonus under these conditions ???
 
I never attacked you.

yes, you do it all the time, and don't even realize.
silly, dishonest, self-serving, comparing me to Stalin ...

that's very much attacking the person, not the subject, in direct violation of the Membership Agreement .

maybe you can be so good and refrain from doing that from now on?
thanks.
 
Last edited:
For those saying they need to compromise to come to an agreement, just a reminder that they already did that, with the debt ceiling. At the time, Republicans and Democrats reached an agreement about the spending levels in the upcoming budget.

Why should it have to be renegotiated?

Just because the hardliners don't like it?

By definition, the "hardliners" don't compromise. That's what the hard line means.

A deal was already negotiated between the two parties. One party is trying to back out of that agreement. How can you compromise on "live up to the agreement" or "don't live up to the agreement"?
 
Also, the "hardliners" have no interest in keeping the government running. They want to burn it all down.

They know their demands are unreasonable.
 
Also, the "hardliners" have no interest in keeping the government running. They want to burn it all down.

They know their demands are unreasonable.

MAGAts wanna burn it down, and the Extreme Leftists want to see it burn so socialism can rise from the ashes.

Its why they oppose compromise and being the adult in the room.

These two groups need to get a hotel.
 

Back
Top Bottom