Christianity is a grotesque blight!

[erwinl]

You still do not the difference between Christianity and Christian...

The difference being that by using the word Christianity, the general group of Christians can be attacked, while still pretending that it is not actually them being attacked? Only the essence that makes them what they are?

That difference?

 

[erwinl]

Your hearing whatever you want to hear aside... the claim is



You and Lukraak have both failed to prove the claim... Lukraak does not even know the difference between aryan and Christianity.

Much like Christians who equivocate atheism with religions and science with faith.

And I don't think you have really read the post of Lukraak_Sisser. Yes you quoted it and commented upon it.
But the highlighted above is proof that you did not read and understand it.

 

[Leumas]

And I don't think you have really read the post of Lukraak_Sisser. Yes you quoted it and commented upon it.
But the highlighted above is proof that you did not read and understand it.

Wrong yet again... much like the mistake of Christians who equivocate atheism with religion and science with faith.

 

[Foster Zygote]

I wonder why the special pleading for christianity???

From whom?

 

[Leumas]

The difference being that by using the word Christianity, the general group of Christians can be attacked, while still pretending that it is not actually them being attacked? Only the essence that makes them what they are?

That difference?

Again... more errors... Christianity is an ideology like say racism or white supremacy or communism.

If one execrates racism and white supremacy... the racists and white supremacists might feel execrated too... but that is their problem.

 

[erwinl]

You know what in 1893 and '94 the deadliest thing was that could be said about a person?

That said person was a moderate.

If we look at the tone and scope of your 'arguments'. What is the difference between said tone and the tone Hébert used? Or for that matter Saint-Just?
(other than that they had the opportunity to actually act upon their words).

 

[Leumas]

(other than that they had the opportunity to actually act upon their words).

Yes... like the Catholic Church and its bishops and priests when they went around hunting for witches and Jews and heretics and scientists and science books to burn and torture.

Or like the Anglicans and Protestants who did the same throughout the ages.

 

[erwinl]

Yes... like the Catholic Church and it's bishops and priests when they went around hunting for witches and Jews and heretics and scientists and science books to burn and torture.

Or like the Anglicans and Protestants who did the same throughout the ages.

I can say two things about this answer.
Either you're deliberately ignoring the point I was making
Or you agree with the equivalence in tone, compared to Hébert, or Saint-Just (and let's throw Marat into it as well).

 

[Leumas]

....an aryan....

Do ...

You do realize that Christianity is not a race like Aryans... right?

But there is a risible similarity... in that the Christianity myth is based upon a lie... and the German Aryan myth is based upon a lie too.

ETA: Christians are not a race either... neither are Jews... but Christians keep insisting they are... because of course their fairy tales and myths say so... much like the Aryan fairy tale.. and fairy tales upon fairy tales resulting in errors upon errors that nearly destroyed the world... and most likely still will.

 

[Leumas]

I can say two things about this answer.
Either you're deliberately ignoring the point I was making...

The point you were making is claptrap... but the last statement in your post... is exactly what Christianity and Christians did and are doing now...

... they had the opportunity to actually act upon their words...

And the results have been and are now... bloody (literally) awful.

 

[erwinl]

Could you please answer the question I asked in post 386?

I'll post it here again.
If we look at the tone and scope of your 'arguments'. What is the difference between said tone and the tone Hébert used? Or for that matter Saint-Just?

 

[Leumas]

Could you please answer the question I asked in post 386?

I'll post it here again.
If we look at the tone and scope of your 'arguments'. What is the difference between said tone and the tone Hébert used? Or for that matter Saint-Just?

Your question is nonsense... and does not merit an answer... the crimes of the Catholic Church's Popes and bishops and the Anglican Church's missionaries and the Lutheran Church's clerics etc. etc. etc. are more heinous over numerous centuries and more hideous than all the rest of crimes done except perhaps by Muslims as a close second.

 

[erwinl]

Your question is nonsense... and does not merit an answer... the crimes of the Catholic Church's Popes and bishops and the Anglican Church's missionaries and the Lutheran Church's clerics etc. etc. etc. are more heinous over numerous centuries and more hideous than all the rest of crimes done except perhaps by Muslims as a close second.

No need.

This is answer enough. More than enough.

A mirror was offered, but it's truth was denied. It's vision, if even seen, recoiled from.

 

[Myriad]

Indeed...

However... I think it is the only one that says that foppish dastards (i.e. priests) who carry out hideous crimes in their rectories and elsewhere, will be welcomed in heaven with 99 times more joyous jubilation than their victims who remain duped by the cult despite its hideous crimes that were never stopped by the sadistic voyeur Jesus.

And worse... while those lecherous priests are being welcomed into the bosom of the licentious voyeur Jesus, their victims who did not remain duped by the cult of human blood sacrifice, will be roasting for eternity for daring to execrate the hoax.

What you're saying is, Christian priests are extra-super-bad because their churches tell scary stories about what happens after people die. That's assuming you don't actually believe that they really dictate the disposition of anyone's immortal soul.

In the modern world there are tens of millions of people far more wealthy than any priest. These wealthy elites can and do waste resources, manipulate markets to the detriment of many, and evade legal accountability for countless criminal acts. All to enrich themselves. Not just tell scary stories about doing these things; actually do them for real.

Billionaires and other elite business leaders can and do pollute the environment, impoverish towns or whole regions, exploit employees, and injure or kill customers (sometimes by the thousands or millions) with unsafe products. All to enrich themselves. Not just tell scary stories about doing these things; actually do them for real.

Elite politicians and government leaders command power even exceeding that of the billionaires. They can and do steal public funds, unjustly oppress or imprison whole populations, deliberately or carelessly engineer famines, and carry out wars that result in casualties (sometimes by the millions). All to enrich themselves. Not just tell scary stories about doing these things; actually do them for real.

But, sure, go stand outside a local rectory and yell at a priest. That'll improve the world.

 

[Leumas]

Religion is not a race!

Just in case someone is confused...

Christianity is an ideology.... just like say white supremacy or Nazism or Communism etc.

It is not being a Hitler or a Stalin for one to execrated an ideology... just like say Islam.

Get that... it is not being a genocidal racist to criticize and point out the atrocious claptrap in Islam... because Islam is an ideology and Muslims are not a race.

The same applies to Christianity since it... like Islam... is an ideology filled with errors and pernicious claptrap... and Christians are not a race.

What is a genocidal fascism is to burn people because they did not genuflect to the foppish Pope and kiss his red shoes and grotesque ring (purchased with the blood of millions) and kowtow to his IDEOLOGY.

Just like the demented Islamic clerics also chop heads off of anyone who does not kowtow to their IDEOLOGY,

Execrating those torturing criminal ideologies with written words is not the same thing as them torturing and burning and chopping heads off in the name of their ideologies throughout the ages and now in the name of their ideologies machinating to make their ideologies rule over all.


Get that... just like theists are using all sorts of chicanery to try to equivocate atheism with their blind faiths... the attempt to equivocate written execration of the crimes and atrocities of their faiths with their crimes is yet more hoaxing and hoodwinking and chicanery.


ETA: Judaism too is an ideology and Jews are not a race... but tragically due to the theistic imbecility of Islam and Christianity mostly and sadly even Judaism itself... and of course racist ideologies like Nazism and white supremacism and Zionism... based upon the awful bloody Buybull... humanity has been blighted into believing racist Bronze Age tribal fairy tales and myths antithetical to rationality and reality... with all the tragedies that ensued throughout the centuries.

 

[theprestige]

Again... more errors... Christianity is an ideology like say racism or white supremacy or communism.

If one execrates racism and white supremacy... the racists and white supremacists might feel execrated too... but that is their problem.

Again... more errors... Jewry is an ideology like say racism or white supremacy or communism.

If one execrates Jewry ... the Jews might feel execrated too... but that is their problem.​

Q.E.D.!

 

[Leumas]

A mirror was offered, but it's truth was denied. It's vision, if even seen, recoiled from.

The mirror you offered was presented with the backside while the reflective side was still facing your side.

 

[Leumas]

...Jewry is an ideology like say racism or white supremacy or communism.

If one execrates Jewry ... the Jews might feel execrated too... but that is their problem.​

The fact that you opted to use the word Jewry instead of Judaism... bespeaks oodles.

Christianity and Judaism are ideologies... and Christians and Jews as adherents of their respective ideologies are not races.

Equivocating the word Jewry with Christianity is all a rational person needs to see the extent of errors upon errors in your post.

 

[erwinl]

Just in case someone is confused...

Christianity is an ideology.... just like say white supremacy or Nazism or Communism etc.

It is not being a Hitler or a Stalin for one to execrated an ideology... just like say Islam.

Get that... it is not being a genocidal racist to criticize and point out the atrocious claptrap in Islam... because Islam is an ideology and Muslims are not a race.

The same applies to Christianity since it... like Islam... is an ideology filled with errors and pernicious claptrap... and Christians are not a race.

What is a genocidal fascism is to burn people because they did not genuflect to the foppish Pope and kiss his red shoes and grotesque ring (purchased with the blood of millions) and kowtow to his IDEOLOGY.

Just like the demented Islamic clerics also chop heads off of anyone who does not kowtow to their IDEOLOGY,

Execrating those torturing criminal ideologies with written words is not the same thing as them torturing and burning and chopping heads off in the name of their ideologies throughout the ages and now in the name of their ideologies machinating to make their ideologies rule over all.


Get that... just like theists are using all sorts of chicanery to try to equivocate atheism with their blind faiths... the attempt to equivocate written execration of the crimes and atrocities of their faiths with their crimes is yet more hoaxing and hoodwinking and chicanery.


ETA: Judaism too is an ideology and Jews are not a race... but tragically due to the theistic imbecility of Islam and Christianity mostly and sadly even Judaism itself... and of course racist ideologies like Nazism and white supremacism and Zionism... based upon the awful bloody Buybull... humanity has been blighted into believing racist Bronze Age tribal fairy tales and myths antithetical to rationality and reality... with all the tragedies that ensued throughout the centuries.

Yeah.
Just like a Marat.

Starting with a genuine valid point (more than one for sure), but fighting and haranguing so much that in the end he, and the others like him, turned into the very thing he was fighting against. Even worse, one might say.

Marat was more eloquent though. So, we're losing even there. Shame about that.

 

[Leumas]

Yeah.
Just like a Marat.

Starting with a genuine valid point (more than one for sure), but fighting and haranguing so much that in the end he, and the others like him, turned into the very thing he was fighting against. Even worse, one might say.

Marat was more eloquent though. So, we're losing even there. Shame about that.

You really dislike the French Revolution... do you also dislike the American Revolution too??

You are still holding the mirror, reflective side facing Catholicism and Christianity and theism... that is what is being reflected in your above post.