Electric universe theories here.

[tusenfem]

M.Volwerk

Not just the sun but at comets too..

So, as usual you think that everything that may sound similar is the same.

 

[tusenfem]

Hope you picked that up tusenfem, flux tubes are full of magnetic flux unless of course they are empty flux that contain no magnetic flux.

But they do contain PLASMA. Not quasi neutral either.

Oh wow, I am flabbergasted, I never knew!

 

[tusenfem]

So not just empty and full, tusenfem?

What if you just tried to understand my answers in the context of the paper that you are getting them.

This is simple flux tube interchange instability (here another term that you do not understand to add to your vocabulary).
Depending on the situation the filled (heavier) flux tubes will exchange location with empty (less heavy) flux tubes.
This is a well known process in planetary magnetospheres.

 

[tusenfem]

M.Volwerk

If you would have comprehensive reading skills then you would understand this, but as you do not, it is hopeless.

 

[tusenfem]

Let’s see what the expert says in relation too these and switchbacks...

Please explain to me why you think switchback have anything to do with nested draping at a comet.

 

[Steve]

Please explain to me why you think switchback have anything to do with nested draping at a comet.

Hmmmm?

 

[Sol88]

What if you just tried to understand my answers in the context of the paper that you are getting them.

This is simple flux tube interchange instability (here another term that you do not understand to add to your vocabulary).
Depending on the situation the filled (heavier) flux tubes will exchange location with empty (less heavy) flux tubes.
This is a well known process in planetary magnetospheres.

No, you are wrong.

This is a plasma instability, a current driven plasma instability. Why didn’t you just say so, tusenfem?

Big problem, apparently, for the mainstream...

The interchange instability is a key issue in the field of fusion energy, where magnetic fields are used to confine a plasma in a volume surrounded by the field.

wiki

Safire solved the problem of plasma confinement awhile back. The ELECTRIC SUN.

 

[Sol88]

What if you just tried to understand my answers in the context of the paper that you are getting them.

This is simple flux tube interchange instability (here another term that you do not understand to add to your vocabulary).
Depending on the situation the filled (heavier) flux tubes will exchange location with empty (less heavy) flux tubes.
This is a well known process in planetary magnetospheres.

Seems this plasma instability also suffers the Bennet pinch.

This can happen in any driven plasma, afaik.

Where’s the big battery, one wonders...

 

[Sol88]

So, as usual you think that everything that may sound similar is the same.

In this case and electric current is an electric current.

Sorry, flux tube/$.



Whoops, Birkeland current.

 

[tusenfem]

No, you are wrong.

This is a plasma instability, a current driven plasma instability. Why didn’t you just say so, tusenfem?

Oh just read the friggin paper, man, the word "current" appears a total of 0 (ZERO) times in it.

But I am sure you are much more knowledgeble than the original authors (of whom I know three personally).

Big problem, apparently, for the mainstream...

wiki

Well, in a planetary magnetosphere the interchange instability its flux tubes moving in and out. Wiki is not the holy grail.

Safire solved the problem of plasma confineent awhile back. The ELECTRIC SUN.

Which of couse has NOTHING to do with the transport of magnetic flux in the Kronian magnetosphere.

 

[tusenfem]

Seems this plasma instability also suffers the Bennet pinch.

What does this even mean?

This can happen in any driven plasma, afaik.

Plasma instabilities are often here and there.

Where’s the big battery, one wonders...

You tell me, your EU Sun is still not burning.

 

[Sol88]

This has absolutely nothing to do with currents, it is basically interchange of "full" and "empty" tubes.

To reiterate. the above.

Electric currents containing plasma instabilities....


Simple answer that tusenfem, the expert here, loves to waltz around.

 

[Sol88]

Oh just read the friggin paper, man, the word "current" appears a total of 0 (ZERO) times in it.

But I am sure you are much more knowledgeble than the original authors (of whom I know three personally).



Well, in a planetary magnetosphere the interchange instability its flux tubes moving in and out. Wiki is not the holy grail.



Which of couse has NOTHING to do with the transport of magnetic flux in the Kronian magnetosphere.

Magnetic flux....

Plasma in motion, specifically ELECTRIC CURRENTS.

You seem to neglect this for unknown reasons.

Oh, hang on....

The well known Parker spiral [Parker, 1958] of the IMF is only obtained after averaging over relatively long time periods [see e.g. Ness and Wilcox, 1964; Borovsky, 2010], and even in a perfect spiral there will be sectors where x and x ,i.e.pointing Sunward or anti-sunward.

 

[tusenfem]

Simple answer that tusenfem, the expert here, loves to waltz around.

Jesus frigging Christ, you are like a bad George Dubya Bush, you hope by repeating your claim again and again and again that we will believe you.
Dubya managed it with his Irak after 9/11, weirdly enough.

Unfortunately for you, space plasma physics has an enourmous amount of data, which you choose to ignore, and is analysing this data (and no thet is not MHD) and finds out stuff, which you then squeeze and melt and mold to some weird EU interpretation (well basically just cherry pick and quote mine, without understanding the words that you are copypasting).

I am not walzing around, even though it is ball season here in Austria. It is you who is sidestepping in every direction as soon as you find out that the stuff you claim is wrong, then you just surf the web and find some intersting term, which has noting to do with the topic, and disrupt the discussion.

Of course, I know that you get off on it, when we get irritated with all the ridiulous BS you are posting.

 

[Sol88]

Please explain to me why you think switchback have anything to do with nested draping at a comet.

Let’s have a look a the ELECTRON density in these “switchbacks” (Birkeland currents), shall we...

 

[Sol88]

Jesus frigging Christ, you are like a bad George Dubya Bush, you hope by repeating your claim again and again and again that we will believe you.
Dubya managed it with his Irak after 9/11, weirdly enough.

Unfortunately for you, space plasma physics has an enourmous amount of data, which you choose to ignore, and is analysing this data (and no thet is not MHD) and finds out stuff, which you then squeeze and melt and mold to some weird EU interpretation (well basically just cherry pick and quote mine, without understanding the words that you are copypasting).

I am not walzing around, even though it is ball season here in Austria. It is you who is sidestepping in every direction as soon as you find out that the stuff you claim is wrong, then you just surf the web and find some intersting term, which has noting to do with the topic, and disrupt the discussion.

Of course, I know that you get off on it, when we get irritated with all the ridiulous BS you are posting.

So you didn’t actually know that plasma can do this.

Nested electric currents.

You just were surprised by the magnetic fields reversing....

Birkeland currrnts contain both the outgoing and return current.

As observed. Currents in Cometary Comae

Let delve in, shall we?

 

[jonesdave116]

Let’s have a look a the ELECTRON density in these “switchbacks” (Birkeland currents), shall we...

They are not currents, and nobody with a clue is claiming that they are. Show me one person qualified in plasma physics who is claiming that Birkeland currents leave the Sun. You can't. You don't understand the first thing about the subject, and neither does anyone else in your cult. That is why your cult does not exist in the scientific literature.
Alfven told you why you are wrong. And you cannot show where he was wrong.
Get an education.

 

[jonesdave116]

Nested electric currents.

Ouch! The stupid here hurts! You still don't understand the very basic concept of nested draping! Get back to us when you've got a clue.

 

[jonesdave116]

Why? You'll only tell him he's a mainstream lackey, and that your degree in wooistry from the Uri Geller Institute of Spoon Bending, means that you understand plasma physics better than plasma physicists!

Call me psychic!

 

[tusenfem]

Let’s have a look a the ELECTRON density in these “switchbacks” (Birkeland currents), shall we...

Why?
But lead the way, show us.