You think that was a non-pejorative usage? Your reading comprehension fails you.
Of course you won't get counterexamples of #1. People used 'woke' seriously for like a hot second till realizing they sounded like idiots that can't use words properly. The only people still using it seriously are those championing illiterate speech patterns.
Now 'woke' is largely a slam for people taking social consciousness/ political correctness to what they consider comical extremes. 'Overwoke' was a term I heard bantered, which is probably a better descriptor for such attitudes.
And as with almost any word in the English language, it can be used consistently or not. Mx Gender Neutral Potato Head is laughably overwoke. Meatless options at Cracker Barrel are not, and are a smart idea, for both customers and marketing strategies to health conscious demographics that like Southern style cooking.
I've been rereading old threads, because that's something I do, and I came across this example of what I was talking about before:
Is Meed here ceding the use of those terms to others? Or are they merely recognising that they are no longer useful in a productive discussion?
Does it?You think that was a non-pejorative usage? Your reading comprehension fails you.
The movie goes to pains to depict Elvis as a man of liberal conscience who is deeply moved by the various political and social crises facing the United States in his lifetime but whose activist inclinations are repeatedly thwarted by the dastardly Parker.
Does it?
Of course you won't get counterexamples of #1. People used 'woke' seriously for like a hot second till realizing they sounded like idiots that can't use words properly. The only people still using it seriously are those championing illiterate speech patterns.
Now 'woke' is largely a slam for people taking social consciousness/ political correctness to comical extremes.
Mx Gender Neutral Potato Head is laughably overwoke.
They said they were dropping the Mr. to promote "gender equality and inclusion". How is that not "fit[ting] the narrative of the anti-woke brigade"?The Potato Head toys are not "gender neutral". They just removed "Mr." from the brand name. Of course, like most of these stories, it doesn't fit the narrative of the anti-woke brigade.
As an insult to AAVE, I'm trying to figure out if this is racist, or just being a snob.
To most conservatives, any attempt to be inclusive is "taking social consciousness/ political correctness to comical extremes"
The Potato Head toys are not "gender neutral". They just removed "Mr." from the brand name. Of course, like most of these stories, it doesn't fit the narrative of the anti-woke brigade.
No, "woke" is being used as shorthard for someone having a "liberal conscience who is deeply moved by...various political and social crises" of his time and place in history. This is a perfectly cromulent and politically neutral usage of the term, and not remotely pejorative. It is literally what people mean when they self-identify as woke.That "woke" is being used as a pejorative aimed at Luhrmann's take on Elvis.
I think this is close, but not quite there. One has to have particular beliefs about the nature of, and solutions to, these crises to be woke.No, "woke" is being used as shorthard for someone having a "liberal conscience who is deeply moved by...various political and social crises" of his time and place in history. This is a perfectly cromulent and politically neutral usage of the term, and not remotely pejorative. It is literally what people mean when they self-identify as woke.
No, "woke" is being used as shorthard for someone having a "liberal conscience who is deeply moved by...various political and social crises" of his time and place in history. This is a perfectly cromulent and politically neutral usage of the term, and not remotely pejorative. It is literally what people mean when they self-identify as woke.
I think this is close, but not quite there. One has to have particular beliefs about the nature of, and solutions to, these crises to be woke.
A wise man once wrote "The master is usage."There is no such "mastery" - all there is is usage
Because it would require a massive amount of eavesdropping to say with any certainty whether African Americans have given up usage of the term (statistically speaking) and if I had access to the unredacted Alexa usage database, I'd be contractually obligated not to leverage that information here.You don't seem to be castigating the American black population for ceding the meaning of the word, why not?
Well, to some extent the same could be said of "woke". I agree it's not a perfect analogy but it is an illustration of what I was talking about. The modern usage has made it more or less useless for good communication.Woke is slightly different to "PC" - PC - in modern use of course - was created by the right as a strawman to attack.
No, "woke" is being used as shorthard for someone having a "liberal conscience who is deeply moved by...various political and social crises" of his time and place in history. This is a perfectly cromulent and politically neutral usage of the term, and not remotely pejorative. It is literally what people mean when they self-identify as woke.
[Explicit Language Warning] [emoji3544]
https://twitter.com/KathyBurke/status/1502941939427074050
Popped up in my social feed this a.m.
So woke to use a sexual slur. ("Oh but I used it wokily against people I hate so it's ok," no doubt.)
Shouldn't we defer to the offended twats though?Twat - at least in the UK - has long passed being an inherently sexual slur.
Seems like a continuum problem.No doubt this usage is weaponized by some elements of the rightwing who know very well the differences between the wokescolds and normal empathetic people.
Does the NYT count?
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/10/03/...dterm-elections-polling.html?showTranscript=1
(Click the transcript button if it doesn't pop up.)
((Notice that most survey respondents said Democrats are not too woke.))