What I'm aware of is that it exposes the flaw in your "if the voters support it, it's ok despite its illegality" stand.
Wrong. It exposes that the legal avenues of enforcement were obviously impotent. As they may well be in this case.
Meh. I mean if it is prosecuted with some major impact, that will possibly impact votes. But otherwise, who cares? I would say on any of it, if you can get away with it, and the voters support it, do it.
If someone doesn't like it, do something about it other than whine. There is a lot of whining over this...let's see the action.
They are perfectly congruent. The way the system should work is that lawbreakers are prosecuted. If there is no prosecution, then what does that say? The fact of the matter is, a lot of "iffy" stuff goes on in politics.
For example, I don't care about what DeSantis has done here until it is proven to be a prosecutable offense. If he is prosecuted, and convicted of a crime, I will stand by that decision. If the law has clearly been broken, he should be held accountable.
That is independent of whether it was a douchey action. What you can "get away with" is the reality of how law is enforced (or not).
Everyone is so up in arms over this, as I say let's see the legal action and the results. That will be the determiner. My guess? No legal action of consequence.
Last edited: