The Jan. 6 Investigation

Status
Not open for further replies.
wareyin said:
It's a darn shame you can't actually bring yourself to say that those who participated in the events of 1/6 should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law, but it's also beside the point that was made.
Click to expand...


Actually, I have stated that exact thing many times in this forum.

Those who participated in the events of 1/6 should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.
 
Regnad Kcin said:
Okay, I have you down for two Blowjob Liars with noodles, a Sweet ‘n Sour Benghazi over fried rice, and a Tan Soup Lo Mein. Would you like any drinks with that?
Click to expand...

Thanks for calling, sure, we can add to your order. What? Now you want two dozen more Benghazis? With egg rolls? Wow, your group must be pretty hungry! Heh heh.
 
"I'm not for X, I'm just going to argue against everything anti-X"

This is not new. The Proudly Wrong have been doing it for years.
 
dudalb said:
That footage is why I am, at least for now, skeptical about gun control. We might needs to guns to fight a fascist takeover of the US. I know I get laughed at for this,but more and more I am convinced things will not have a peaceful ending in the US. And if it comes to a fight, I want the pro democracy side to win.
Whatever it takes......
Click to expand...

We already have gun control. Felons are generally not allowed to own or possess firearms. Why not extend that to children or crazy people? I'm a gun owner. I believe in responsible gun ownership. That includes that irresponsible individuals shouldn't possess guns.
 
wareyin said:
If you believe this, why do you oppose any attempt to investigate or make public knowledge how the events of 1/6 occurred?
Click to expand...


Again, what you are saying is not congruent with the facts. I do not oppose investigation into the events of 1/6. Seriously, I don't think I am the demographic that you are after, here.
 
Warp12 said:
Seriously, I don't think I am the demographic that you are after, here.
Click to expand...

Yep you just always wind up on their side by the pure magical coincidence of it and you repeat their talking points word for word for no reason. We totally believe you, person who has not once ever been honest about anything he has ever said.
 
Warp12 said:
Again, what you are saying is not congruent with the facts. I do not oppose investigation into the events of 1/6. Seriously, I don't think I am the demographic that you are after, here.
Click to expand...

I linked to your opposition. You reiterated that opposition in the post I quoted.

I'm not after a demographic here. I just want to ascertain whether you're transparently lying or are admitting to violating rule 7.
 
Warp12 said:
Again, what you are saying is not congruent with the facts. I do not oppose investigation into the events of 1/6. Seriously, I don't think I am the demographic that you are after, here.
Click to expand...

No, you're just against investigating anyone who might be a Republican.
 
Warp12 said:
Again, what you are saying is not congruent with the facts. I do not oppose investigation into the events of 1/6. Seriously, I don't think I am the demographic that you are after, here.
Click to expand...

Thinking that the investigation is unfair, but claiming to support that investigation, is a pretty weird bit of cognitive dissonance.
 
Last edited:
acbytesla said:
No, you're just against investigating anyone who might be a Republican.
Click to expand...


Where do you get that idea?? How can you be against investigating Republicans in the events of 1/6? I'd say that mostly Republicans should be investigated, although not exclusively.
 
No it's easy he wants the Republicans do investigate their own coup so it's no "political."
 
Warp12 said:
Where do you get that idea?? How can you be against investigating Republicans in the events of 1/6? I'd say that mostly Republicans should be investigated, although not exclusively.
Click to expand...

Yeah sure we totally believe you.

Did Susan Collins get an account here and nobody told us?
 
Delphic Oracle said:
I made it a point to keep a tally going on two convenience store annoyances: people who don't reach to take the door you're holding open for them and people who, when there is an obvious line, don't get in line when any open 6 inches of open counter space are available.

The results after a few days were depressing enough that I stopped counting. I've stopped holding doors for people and I'm about ready to join in the cavalcade of people who don't understand what a queue is.
Click to expand...

People are, in fact, useless trash.
This transcends class, color, or nationality.

People are stupid trash and need to be eliminated.
I’m rooting for monkey-pox
 
johnny karate said:
Cool. Then why are you claiming that this investigation is unfair?
Click to expand...


I am claiming the committee is highly partisan. There is significant underlying political intent, as is to be expected. Does that mean they can't possibly uncover pertinent facts? No.

I just happen to find the level of partisanship amusing. And especially the denials. Just own it, and make the most of it, I say.

This debate was gone through many pages ago, where many people denied it as well. I just felt it quite relevant again, with all of the primetime drama and celebratory comments.
 
Warp12 said:
I am claiming the committee is highly partisan. There is significant underlying political intent, as is to be expected. Does that mean they can't possibly uncover pertinent facts? No.

I just happen to find the level of partisanship amusing. And especially the denials. Just own it, and make the most of it, I say.

This debate was gone through many pages ago, where many people denied it as well. I just felt it quite relevant again, with all of the primetime drama and celebratory comments.
Click to expand...

Okay, so you support this investigation and think it's fair, correct?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom