If you need to ask the original question, given the last three weeks, you should resign from the Human Race.
you don't spell "decade" "T-H-R-E-E- -W-E-E-K-S"
If you need to ask the original question, given the last three weeks, you should resign from the Human Race.
you don't spell "decade" "T-H-R-E-E- -W-E-E-K-S"
you don't spell "decade" "T-H-R-E-E- -W-E-E-K-S"
you forgot the "two"
I'm liking where this is going...In your hypothetical wouldn't Canada still have the right to defend its legally recognized borders?
If you need to ask the original question, given the last three weeks, you should resign from the Human Race.
It is important to note that when Russian politicians say "Nazi" they mean "people opposed to what the Russian Government is doing".
There is no history or ideology here, just a term to identify The Enemy with embedded justification to do whatever to them.
The first page of this thread sure did age like milk.
I actually like how the thread has gone.Saw the thread title and came to post the same.![]()
Nothing like that has anything to do with the original subject of this thread. The story Russia was using back then was about protecting Russians in part of Ukraine which had become dangerous, not about comparisons of which tyrant is more tyranty. That's one of the stories Russia's using now. (If I'd heard anything like that back then, I wouldn't have had any questions about what's wrong with it.)I can kind of cut Delvo some slack for thinking maybe Ukraine had a corrupt neo-Nazi regime that was horribly oppressing ethnic Russians... Even if Ukraine's government in 2014 was a corrupt ultranationalist regime that needed changing, Delvo thinks Vladimir Putin is a good solution?