Cont: Corona Virus Conspiracy Theories Part IV

[Tippit]

You seem to lack knowledge of how viruses travel through the air. They are carried on the water droplets that are expelled when you exhale. Those water droplets are far greater in size than .1 micron. Block the water droplets and you block the virus.

You seem to lack the ability to read a study written in English.

 

[Blue Mountain]

Under penalty of perjury, 3 military whistleblowers, including military flight surgeon Theresa Long, are named,

examples:

Miscarriages increased by almost 300% over the five yr average.

Cancer increased by almost 300% over the five yr average.

Neurological issues increased by over 1000 %.

Improved links:

Military Vax Data Rocks DC: Catastrophic Injury Toll Exposed At Sen. Johnson Hearing
https://rumble.com/vta7e1-military-v...BiQKsY9nizrtbY

Attorney Tom Renz - vaccine whistleblowers: miscarriages increase 279% cancer increases 296%
https://rumble.com/vt8om8-attorney-t...-cancer-i.html

For those not familiar with rumble,com:

Overall, we rate Rumble Right Biased and Questionable based on the promotion of right-wing propaganda and conspiracy theories and false information, use of poor sources, and a lack of transparency.

Reasoning: Propaganda, Conspiracy, Poor Sourcing, False Information, Lack of Transparency
Bias Rating: FAR-RIGHT (The graph on the page shows them at EXTREME)
Factual Reporting: LOW
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY

Source

In my opinion, using Rumble as a source is a step or two below using the Daily Mail. Rumble simply is not credible; it's an echo-chamber insane asylum run by the patients.

 

[Steve]

For those not familiar with rumble,com:


Source

In my opinion, using Rumble as a source is a step or two below using the Daily Mail. Rumble simply is not credible; it's an echo-chamber insane asylum run by the patients.

IOW a routine credulous Bubba link.

 

[Resume]

IOW a routine credulous Bubba link.

Indeed.

 

[beachnut]

Covidiot - Someone who ignores the warnings regarding public health or safety.

Covidiot - when used by anti-vaxxers, an examples of Psychological Projection

Face-diaper - what conspiracy theorist should wear to stop the BS spewing from their mouths...

Face mask - called a Face-Diaper by anti-vaxxers because their breath smell like a full diaper

Face masks, inspiring improved mouth hygiene

 

[Bubba]

I think I can see you in this video...


A mere five second video, it says it all

https://www.facebook.com/gamergenki/videos/716686795973852/

 

[threadworm]

You seem to lack the ability to read a study written in English.

Writing something down doesn't automatically make it true.

 

[Tippit]

Writing something down doesn't automatically make it true.

Studies, websites, and video sites are only valid when they confirm your pre-existing narrative. You're the definition of "pseudo-skeptic". There is no evidence that could convince you, because you're fundamentally unreasonable, and dishonest.

 

[Bubba]

Just today I was informing someone that at least one big pharma board member sits on each of the MSM Boards. I recalled how no one knew about it, when I shared it here at ISF. IIRC, the esteemed Mr Cosmic Yak was the only one who thanked me for posting that little piece of the puzzle. He is a fine gentleman. A model member.

 

[Cosmic Yak]

You seem to lack knowledge of how viruses travel through the air. They are carried on the water droplets that are expelled when you exhale. Those water droplets are far greater in size than .1 micron. Block the water droplets and you block the virus.

You seem to lack the ability to read a study written in English.

How about actually responding to the point being made, instead of resorting to personal attacks?

 

[Cosmic Yak]

Just today I was informing someone that at least one big pharma board member sits on each of the MSM Boards. I recalled how no one knew about it, when I shared it here at ISF. IIRC, the esteemed Mr Cosmic Yak was the only one who thanked me for posting that little piece of the puzzle. He is a fine gentleman. A model member.

No, I did not thank you, I asked you to prove it, and you declined with your usual snark.
No gaslighting, Bubba, that's naughty.
If you want to continue with this claim, you need to show the evidence, or it will simply be dismissed again.
Up to you.

 

[Cosmic Yak]

Studies, websites, and video sites are only valid when they confirm your pre-existing narrative. You're the definition of "pseudo-skeptic". There is no evidence that could convince you, because you're fundamentally unreasonable, and dishonest.

 

[Pixel42]

VAERS stats with reasonably inferred reporting rates indicate deaths in the tens or even hundreds of thousands, injuries in the millions, and moderate to severe adverse events in the tens of millions.

I see you still claiming to be able to interpret VAERS data better than those whose job it is, and still assuming that there is a non zero percentage of every type of adverse event reported to VAERS that is caused by the vaccines.

A good place to start to justify these extraordinary claims might be by responding to my last post:

I see no reason to assume that these 22,193 people were "otherwise healthy people with no co-morbidities". Anyone can report events to VAERS, there's no way to ensure the reports are limited to such cases. I looked at the VAERS mortality data a while back and could see no indication that the events had been processed or filtered, but I could have missed it. What has led you to think that this number comprises only "otherwise healthy people with no co-morbidities"?
The other piece of data I would need before concluding that this number is alarming is the normal sudden death rate for "otherwise healthy people with no co-morbidities" with which it can be compared.

 

[Mojo]

Just today I was informing someone that at least one big pharma board member sits on each of the MSM Boards. I recalled how no one knew about it, when I shared it here at ISF. IIRC, the esteemed Mr Cosmic Yak was the only one who thanked me for posting that little piece of the puzzle. He is a fine gentleman. A model member.

No, I did not thank you, I asked you to prove it, and you declined with your usual snark.
No gaslighting, Bubba, that's naughty.
If you want to continue with this claim, you need to show the evidence, or it will simply be dismissed again.
Up to you.

And here’s Bubba failing to answer Comic Yak’s question: http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?p=13617191#post13617191

 

[abaddon]

And here’s Bubba failing to answer Comic Yak’s question: http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?p=13617191#post13617191

This has been going on for years at this point. We all know by now that Bubba is full of it. According to him, Trump would be back in office last July. Or August. Or he never said that, ever.

And we can plough back through the previous failed claims if anyone is sufficiently bored to do it. Anyone recall the kraken? Or his Q fiasco? Or...so many fails.

Now if it were you or me or most anyone, we would be thinking "Maybe I am wrong" and rethinking the whole nine yards. Not Bubba.

Space aliens are invading my washing machine. My dishwasher has a ghost inside it. There actually is no limit to what some people will make up out of whole cloth.

Which of those three statements is true?

 

[Planigale]

The premise of your question is ridiculous, because different vaccines work differently. Smallpox vaccine infects the host to elicit an immune response, but it's not a severe infection because it's been attenuated - in other words, nothing like what I just described about the mRNA "vaccines", which, by the way are leaky and non-sterilizing, unlike the smallpox vaccine.

Smallpox vaccination uses a modified vaccinia virus as a vector to inject viral DNA (not RNA actual DNA) into human cells where the foreign DNA hijacks the cells systems to convert that DNA into RNA and then the RNA directs the production of viral proteins. At the same the viral DNA is replicated in the cells. The viral proteins produced by the hijacked cells then promote an immune response. FWIW oral polio vaccine uses modified enteroviruses to inject polio RNA into human cells in just the same way that adenoids virus vector vaccines do with coronavirus RNA and mRNA in lipid droplets fuses with cell membranes and enters cells. The difference with mRNA vaccines is there is not a lot of extraneous DNA or RNA not viral enzymes involved. all much cleaner but fundamentally the way vaccines worked from the beginning injecting viral DNA or RNA into cells hijacking cell systems producing viral proteins and stimulating immunity.

 

[Planigale]

I don't deny the experimental gene therapy elicits an immune response which offers protection depending on the variant. I'm claiming that Covid mortality stats are bogus, VAERS stats with reasonably inferred reporting rates indicate deaths in the tens or even hundreds of thousands, injuries in the millions, and moderate to severe adverse events in the tens of millions. I'm claiming that hospitals are killing patients and blaming it on Covid, health bureaucrats are killing people by panning early treatments that actually work, and for any protection the "vaccines" offer they probably aren't worth either the short or as yet unknown long term risks, given the efficacy of the suppressed treatments, and infection survival rates. They definitely aren't worth the risks in children, and especially young males.

You may claim it, but I know it. I have certified deaths that were from covid, and since vaccinations came in I have seen fewer deaths. I have seen vaccinated people who would likely have died pre-vaccination come into hospital and go home without needing ICU. What I have not seen is anyone come into hospital with a vaccine side effect and no one die from one. (I do not deny there have been some rare cases, but just they are not common.) We look quite hard for vaccine effects. We check date of vaccination for everyone admitted. Vaccine adverse events are usually too mild to need hospital admission.

 

[Planigale]

For the dimwits who still claim that the mRNA fake "vaccines" aren't gene therapy, take it from the CEO of Bayer (who own Monsanto): https://youtu.be/OJFKBritLlc?t=5844

I claim they are as much gene therapy as Smallpox vaccine, (we know from the cartoons that people at the time Smallpox vaccine was introduced were worried about the effects of viral DNA on the human genome), or Polio vaccine.

 

[abaddon]

I claim they are as much gene therapy as Smallpox vaccine, (we know from the cartoons that people at the time Smallpox vaccine was introduced were worried about the effects of viral DNA on the human genome), or Polio vaccine.

[imgw=400]https://www.themorgan.org/sites/default/files/images/blog/gillray_277009v_0001.jpg[/imgw]

Try that next time instead of messing up my browser.

 

[Planigale]

Improved links:

So you can take a claim by a lawyer, or you can look at actual data
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34990445/
showing no increase in miscarriage with vaccination.

If I may quote myself from the science thread.
A nice study emphasising the importance of vaccination in pregnancy. From the 'COVID-19 in Pregnancy in Scotland' database linked to records of COVID-19 vaccinations delivered and SARS-CoV-2 infections diagnosed up to and including October 31, 2021.

Quote:

Overall 77.4% (3,833 out of 4,950; 95% confidence interval [CI] 76.2−78.6) of SARS-CoV-2 infections occurred in women who were unvaccinated at the date of onset of infection, with 11.5% (567 out of 4,950; 95% CI 10.6−12.4) in partially vaccinated women and 11.1% (550 out of 4,950; 95% CI 10.3−12.0) in fully vaccinated women.

Of the SARS-CoV-2 infections in pregnancy that occurred in unvaccinated women, 19.5% (748 out of 3,833; 95% CI 18.3−20.8) were associated with hospital admission, compared to 8.3% (47 out of 567; 95% CI 6.2−10.9) of those in partially vaccinated women and 5.1% (28 out of 550; 95% CI 3.5−7.4) of those in fully vaccinated women. A total of 2.7% (102 out of 3,833; 95% CI 2.2−3.2) of the SARS-CoV-2 infections in pregnancy that occurred in unvaccinated women were associated with a critical care admission, compared to 0.2% (1 out of 567; 95% CI 0.01−1.1) of those in partially vaccinated women and 0.2% (1 out of 550 cases; 95% CI 0.01−1.2) of those in fully vaccinated women.

While 77.4% (3,833 out of 4,950; 95% CI 76.2−78.6) of SARS-CoV-2 infections in pregnancy occurred in unvaccinated women, 90.9% (748 out of 823; 95% CI 88.7−92.7) of infections associated with hospital admission and 98.1% (102 out of 104; 95% CI 92.5−99.7) of infections associated with critical care admission, were in unvaccinated women.

A total of 2,364 babies have been born to women who had SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnancy between 1 December 2020 and 31 October 2021. Of these, 2,353 were live births, of which 241 were preterm births (10.2%; 95% CI 9.1−11.6). Overall, 610 of the live births and 101 of the preterm births occurred within 28 days of the date of onset of the mother’s SARS-CoV-2 infection, giving a preterm birth rate among babies born within 28 days of SARS-CoV-2 infection of 16.6% (95% CI 13.7−19.8).

Meanwhile, 11 stillbirths were reported and 8 live births resulted in neonatal deaths (death within 28 days of birth), giving an extended perinatal mortality rate of 8.0 per 1,000 births following SARS-CoV-2 infection at any point in pregnancy and an extended perinatal mortality rate of 22.6 per 1,000 births within 28 days of the onset of maternal infection. All perinatal deaths following SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnancy occurred in women who were unvaccinated at the time of SARS-CoV-2 infection.
For comparison, the background preterm birth rate during the pandemic (from March 1, 2020 to October 31, 2021) was 8.0% (95% CI 7.8−8.1) and the extended perinatal mortality rate was 5.6 per 1,000 births (95% CI 5.1−6.2). On the other hand, the preterm birth rates were 8.6% (95% CI 7.9−9.4) for women who received COVID-19 vaccination in pregnancy, and 8.2% (95% CI 7.0−9.6) for women who gave birth within 28 days of maternal vaccination. Meanwhile, extended perinatal mortality was 4.3 per 1,000 births (95% CI 2.9−6.4) in women who received COVID-19 vaccination in pregnancy, and 4.3 per 1,000 births (95% CI 1.9−9.2) in women who gave birth within 28 days of vaccination.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-021-01666-2

Also
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanepe/article/PIIS2666-7762(22)00006-0/fulltext
ICU admissions for pregnant women with covid almost exclusively limited to the unvaccinated across multiple countries.