• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Cont: Corona Virus Conspiracy Theories Part IV

Status
Not open for further replies.
Under penalty of perjury, 3 military whistleblowers, including military flight surgeon Theresa Long, are named,

examples:

Miscarriages increased by almost 300% over the five yr average.

Cancer increased by almost 300% over the five yr average.

Neurological issues increased by over 1000 %.



Improved links:



Military Vax Data Rocks DC: Catastrophic Injury Toll Exposed At Sen. Johnson Hearing


https://rumble.com/vta7e1-military-v...BiQKsY9nizrtbY



Attorney Tom Renz - vaccine whistleblowers: miscarriages increase 279% cancer increases 296%

https://rumble.com/vt8om8-attorney-t...-cancer-i.html
 
Under penalty of perjury, 3 military whistleblowers, including military flight surgeon Theresa Long, are named,

examples:

Miscarriages increased by almost 300% over the five yr average.

Cancer increased by almost 300% over the five yr average.

Neurological issues increased by over 1000 %.



Improved links:
Theresa Long, the loon who thinks the vaccine is antifreeze?

Thomas Renz the alleged sex offender?

What interesting company you keep.
 
Posters who continually repost lies lack credibility and integrity.

Integrity is great except when it's backed by delusional thinking. In that case, being sincere doesn't make one any less wrong.

ETA: Oops, I meant to quote the post from Tippit that you quoted. Oh well, the idea carries through.
 
Last edited:
Maybe he uses a hole in the garden?

Alas, the MA requires that I must conceal what I really think about this matter.

If the brakes were released, I might have rather a lot to say. And others might as well.

My crank tolerance has gone from "why do you believe that claim?" to "foxtrot right oscar with that nonsense" in a rather short timeframe.
 
Uh, I read it. It backs up exactly what he said. Here is an excerpt:



By 50 "surgical masks", lets be charitable and assume they were referring to ASTM level 1, the least effective surgical masks typically worn in that context.



So, being charitable and presuming the study was done with only ASTM level 1 surgical masks, they were shown to be ineffective.

The ASTM level 1 spec claims to filter particles at .1 micron with >= 95% efficiency.

The SARS-CoV-2 virus is about .1 micron, so if the worst surgical mask doesn't stop it reliably, then using logical inference, what chance do you think cloth face diapers have at stopping infection? Even ASTM level 3 masks only give you about another 4% efficiency.

The only "masks" that work effectively at lowering your chance of SARS-Cov-2 infection are N95 respirators and above, and those cannot be worn over long periods of time without medical consequences like hypercarbia, and so aren't really suitable for the public anyway.

The face diapers that you pseudo-skeptics so maniacally wear are just virtue-signaling devices used to soothe other Covidiots, and demonstrate your compliance to "authorities", and that, is backed up by actual science.

You seem to lack knowledge of how viruses travel through the air. They are carried on the water droplets that are expelled when you exhale. Those water droplets are far greater in size than .1 micron. Block the water droplets and you block the virus.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom