Cont: Corona Virus Conspiracy Theories Part IV

Status
Not open for further replies.
Childlike Empress said:
Some people, like myself, actually worked in Science™ and know how that works in the 21st century.
Click to expand...

So you've never actually worked in "Science™". You've simply told another self-aggrandizing lie without any forethought as to how easily you could be called on it, and you think the best way to obscure that fact is to pretend that you don't see any of the questions regarding your dubious claim, because, of course, you're the smartest person any of us have ever encountered.
 
michaelsuede said:
This letter was sent to the Senate recently covering a litany of malfeasance by the federal health services.

https://www.scribd.com/document/553669611/Letter-to-Senate-Detailing-NIH-NIAID-and-FDA-Malfeasance

Global COVID Summit – Declaration of Physicians
NIH, NIAID, FDA Malfeasance, Request for HHS OIG Investigation and Legislative Action

January 18, 2022

Senator Rand H. Paul
167 Russell Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510

Dear Senator Paul:

I write to you to share the concerns of over 15,000 physicians and medical scientists who have signed a declaration taking issue with the current management of the government’s COVID-19 response [1].

The FDA recently issued a notice [2] to the Federation of State Medical Boards, warning them that pharmacies and doctors should not be selling or prescribing ivermectin under the claim that ivermectin can treat or prevent COVID-19. Doctors around the country are being threatened by medical boards, at the direction of the FDA, with having their licenses revoked if they offer ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19, even though newly leaked documents [3] show the government knew ivermectin was a highly effective treatment for COVID-19 during the early stages of the pandemic.
Edited by zooterkin: 
<SNIP>
Edited for rule 4.
Click to expand...
15,000 MDs?
That's precious... there are just shy of one million doctors here. And without an audit, I'd be skeptical of even that many on their rolls. [emoji2955]
 
michaelsuede said:
I don't really care what Derek Lowe wrote a year ago. There are now 54 peer reviewed studies showing it works, up two from just a few days ago. More are coming.

I suppose I should add that I have first hand experience with it working as well. Cured me, my friend and both of my elderly parents within about six hours of taking it. Ask anyone who has had COVID and taken ivermectin at early symptom onset if it works. They will tell you the same thing I am, and the same thing 54 peer reviewed studies are saying.

Ivermectin is a "category killer" - this one drug can take out Nyquil, Alka Seltzer, Tamiflu, etc.. etc.. and not only that, it has serious potential for cancer treatment as well. The pharmaceutical industry is crapping their pants over it. After experiencing just how effective it is, I will NEVER be without some in my medicine cabinet.
Click to expand...
Oh, now your just suffering fever sweats.
Sure your over it? [emoji15]
 
Jim_MDP said:
Oh, now your just suffering fever sweats.
Sure your over it? [emoji15]
Click to expand...

Our friend was also this excited - and 'sure' - over Brilliant light power/Blacklight power and Randell Mills. It was the classic perpetual power thingy and is still on going.

He tends to get overly excited about nonsense.
 
Jim_MDP said:
Oh, now your just suffering fever sweats.
Sure your over it? [emoji15]
Click to expand...

The correct pseudo-skeptical response would be to accuse him of having no control, so there would be no possible way for him to know whether it was the Ivermectin that was effective in his recovery, while doing the exact same thing by describing how you're sure the "vaccine" moderated your Covid symptoms which almost certainly would have been worse without it.
 
Tippit said:
The correct pseudo-skeptical response would be to accuse him of having no control, so there would be no possible way for him to know whether it was the Ivermectin that was effective in his recovery, while doing the exact same thing by describing how you're sure the "vaccine" moderated your Covid symptoms which almost certainly would have been worse without it.
Click to expand...

I assume you know this because you self-identify as a pseudo-skeptic and therefore are familiar with the thought processes.
 
Tippit said:
The correct pseudo-skeptical response would be to accuse him of having no control, so there would be no possible way for him to know whether it was the Ivermectin that was effective in his recovery, while doing the exact same thing by describing how you're sure the "vaccine" moderated your Covid symptoms which almost certainly would have been worse without it.
Click to expand...

Actually, his problem is that he doesn't even have verified data. He's just offering anecdotes. For all we know, he could be a pathological liar who made it all up. Or he and these others could be so emotionally invested in the idea that ivermectin is a miracle drug that cures COVID-19, cancer, vaginal dryness, erectile dysfunction, itchy red eyes, methamphetamine withdrawal, whooping fart, Parkinson's disease, toe fungus, peace without honor, osteoporosis and flying ball rot that they took it when they felt the first indication of what was actually just a minor rhinovirus, or a psychosomatically induced perception when no illness was actually present, and crowed triumphantly that ivermectin had cured COVID-19 because that's what they wanted to believe.

And we have a massive amount of controlled data supporting the efficacy of the vaccines, as the unvaccinated are many times more likely to be hospitalized than the vaccinated, and many times more likely to die.
 
Foster Zygote said:
Actually, his problem is that he doesn't even have verified data. He's just offering anecdotes. For all we know, he could be a pathological liar who made it all up.
Click to expand...

For all we know, you and all of the other pseudo-skeptics could be pathological liars. His anecdotes have more credibility with me than your corporate pharmaceutical "peer-reviewed" studies, rubber stamped by a captive FDA.
 
Tippit said:
For all we know, you and all of the other pseudo-skeptics could be pathological liars. His anecdotes have more credibility with me than your corporate pharmaceutical "peer-reviewed" studies, rubber stamped by a captive FDA.
Click to expand...

Yes the real world is entirely mad while you are a fountain of truth and light

LOL
 
Tippit said:
The correct pseudo-skeptical response would be to accuse him of having no control, so there would be no possible way for him to know whether it was the Ivermectin that was effective in his recovery, while doing the exact same thing by describing how you're sure the "vaccine" moderated your Covid symptoms which almost certainly would have been worse without it.
Click to expand...

Tippit said:
For all we know, you and all of the other pseudo-skeptics could be pathological liars. His anecdotes have more credibility with me than your corporate pharmaceutical "peer-reviewed" studies, rubber stamped by a captive FDA.
Click to expand...

'The correct pseudo-sceptical response would be to prefer anecdotes to peer-reviewed evidence.'
Thanks again, Tippit, for modelling pseudo-scepticism for us. You're doing a great job.
 
Pretending just shy of one million doctors didnt notice the risks ie silencing, vilification, canceling, and firing of their more vocal colleagues for doing their job as doctors looks like...


Jim_MDP said:
15,000 MDs?
That's precious... there are just shy of one million doctors here. And without an audit, I'd be skeptical of even that many on their rolls. [emoji2955]
Click to expand...



One day may you realize you lauded liars and ridiculed heroes
 
Bubba said:
One day may you realize you lauded liars and ridiculed heroes
Click to expand...

You are the one who is lauding liars and ridiculing heroes, Bubba, but I long ago gave up hope of you ever realising it. In ten years time, long after your predictions about the dire consequences of Covid vaccination have proved to be as utterly mistaken as your every other silly prediction, you still won't have acknowledged you were wrong. You will simply never refer to them again (as you now ignore your previous failed predictions) and will instead be mindlessly parroting whatever conspiracy theory those same liars have since started peddling.
 
Hear Ye ! Hear Ye !

Ye Fully Vaccinated True Believers of Saints & Partners Fauci & Gates!
(to includie Birthing People, Chestfeeders, and BigFatLie Gobblers).

The time draws nigh to stand up for really woke medical social justice and for Ye to gird thy ...um.......?

:confused: :eek: :confused: :eek:

The Big Lies are unraveling. The covid jab narrative crumbles daily. Sane nations are rejecting mandates while the most injected nations have soaring positives and admissions with your beloved forever jabs. One lying leader got busted for saying 90+% admitted were un-jabbed, but then the truth said it actually was around 37%.

they are lying to you. everyday.

Social Justice Justice Sotomayor lied when they/he/she bleated 100K kids are now seriously hospitalized with covid. She/they/he earlier went on the record barking how he/she/they is committed to promoting some other piece of batcrap social medical wack covid justice BS, which I will link for you, Tuesday or sooner...unless you care enough to do so for yourself....Oh you must look it up!...he/they/she is such a hoot.!!

Gosh, having said all that, I hope no one here now will imply I am a sexist, or ChestFeeder phobic. (I'm a big fan, actually!) (but hey, do attack, show your stuff!)

Or, you could go with say, iddy biddy needle phobic :thumbsup: :) ...sure try that lame dumb gambit, again. It is about all you got now that your Experimental Jab Happy Cult is exposed more every day by normal people.
 
Last edited:
Bubba said:
woke medical social justice
Click to expand...
Bubba said:
Gosh, having said all that, I hope no one here now will imply I am a sexist, or ChestFeeder phobic.
Click to expand...

Bubba said:
Or, you could go with say, iddy biddy needle phobic :thumbsup: :) ...sure try that lame dumb gambit, again. It is about all you got now that your Experimental Jab Happy Cult is exposed more every day by normal people.
Click to expand...

Geez, maybe don't post when you're blacked out drunk!?
 
How COVID Shots Suppress Your Immune System

We now have more details than ever about the mRNA jabs, and it makes one thing very clear: The shots suppress your innate immune system. By inhibiting type-1 interferon, they can raise your risk of malignancy and tumors, and allow dormant viruses like herpes and shingles to emerge.
Click to expand...

On average, there are twice as many reports of cancer following the COVID shots compared to all other vaccines combined over the last 31 years
The fact that the signal is that strong is even more remarkable when you consider that most people don’t think the COVID shot could be a variable in their cancer emergence, so they never report it

In this interview, return guest Stephanie Seneff, Ph.D., a senior research scientist at MIT who has been at MIT for over five decades, discusses her latest paper, "Innate Immune Suppression by SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccinations. The Role of G-quadruplexes, Exosomes and MicroRNAs," co-written with Dr. Peter McCullough, along with two other authors, Dr. Greg Nigh and Dr. Anthony Kyriakopoulos.
Click to expand...

https://articles.mercola.com/sites/...1HL&cid=20220123&mid=DM1098104&rid=1387673278
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom