So no documentation it is then, only claims. Your CT remains rejected for lack of evidence. I'll repeat my earlier question:
So I ask just what in your mind would constitute documentation, Cavey?
So no documentation it is then, only claims. Your CT remains rejected for lack of evidence. I'll repeat my earlier question:
So no documentation it is then, only claims. Your CT remains rejected for lack of evidence. I'll repeat my earlier question:
So I ask just what in your mind would constitute documentation, Cavey?
Again, you have moved the goal posts, Cavey. You asked for documentation that the Russians were filling up U.S. social media with disinformation and when you got it you pretended you were asking a different question.
Still not seeing any response to my requests about why I should even care about this Menard chap, his daddy, or a certain "Beth Martens" who may or may not be fictitious.
What a thinly veiled debate trick. I don't have to excoriate every con man on the planet to make my criticism of Menard valid.
And for the record I use other places on the web to get after Gavin Seim, Christopher Bruce, Tommy Barnett and Karl Koenigs to name a few.
I always go by arayder.
I accept your apologies in advance.
Right, Menard is a small time grifter whose days of glory are past. But here you are seriously considering a bizarre conspiracy theory that he's a Russian agent. A conspiracy theory that, far as I can tell, no one on this forum has seen anywhere but here and you're too coy to direct us to other places it's being discussed.
But you're totally not trying to spread it. It's just up for discussion, since it's out there in the wild.
Menard was an interesting character once, back in his heyday. There's still Freeman/Sovereign Citizen stuff out there and it's been adopted by some Qanons, but Menard doesn't seem to be playing any significant role at all.
Of course, I could be wrong about that and if you had something to say about Menard's latest Freeman stuff, that might be interesting. Arguments that he totally could be a Russian agent are a lot less interesting.
Right, Menard is a small time grifter whose days of glory are past. But here you are seriously considering a bizarre conspiracy theory that he's a Russian agent. A conspiracy theory that, far as I can tell, no one on this forum has seen anywhere but here and you're too coy to direct us to other places it's being discussed.
But you're totally not trying to spread it. It's just up for discussion, since it's out there in the wild.
Menard was an interesting character once, back in his heyday. There's still Freeman/Sovereign Citizen stuff out there and it's been adopted by some Qanons, but Menard doesn't seem to be playing any significant role at all.
Of course, I could be wrong about that and if you had something to say about Menard's latest Freeman stuff, that might be interesting. Arguments that he totally could be a Russian agent are a lot less interesting.
My apologies. I'll take your word for it that you talk about other conmen in other places.
Any particular reason why you segregate your topics and venues like that?
The reason Menard can't more effectively do the the bidding of his country's enemies is because he's a self deluding narcissist.
The reason Menard can't more effectively do the the bidding of his country's enemies is because he's a self deluding narcissist.
And also there's no evidence his country's enemies are bidding him to do anything, remember?
Yeah. It's a conspiracy theory.
But ya' gotta' wonder why Traitor Bobby is taking a page right out of Putin's playbook.
Just saying.