Trump's Coup d'état.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Supreme Court just threw out a suit trying to overturn the election results in Pennslyvania. Did it in one sentence with no dissents.A big nail in the coffin.
 
The tweet suggests the entire court ruled on this. No, Alito alone did. If Alito thinks the case has merit, he can accept the appeal, but even then, the full court doesn't need to hear it. He must be joined by two other justices. He basically cut it off at the knees. Which is what I expected.

You are right techincally, but still pretty much clear the Supreme Court is not going to touch any of these lawsuits with a ten foot pole.
RIP Donnie.
 
Supreme Court just threw out a suit trying to overturn the election results in Pennslyvania. Did it in one sentence with no dissents.A big nail in the coffin.

That's how they do it. Alito has general authority over appeals in the third circuit. He denied referral to the full court. And even if he referred to the full court (IIRC) he needs two other justices to accept it.
The case had ZERO legal merit.
 
You are right techincally, but still pretty much clear the Supreme Court is not going to touch any of these lawsuits with a ten foot pole.
RIP Donnie.

I agree. 99% of me expected this outcome. (I only worried a little)

And it is no coincidence he crushed it on Safe Harbor day.
 
The Trumptards are now saying that the Texas Suite will overturn the election.
They are making a big deal about how the case has been docketed by the Supreme Court and means it will be heard.
That is BS. ANY case submitted to a court is docketed. The case the court just threw out was docketed.
Surprise; the Trumptards are living in la la land, with no understanding of how the legal process works.
 
That's how they do it. Alito has general authority over appeals in the third circuit. He denied referral to the full court. And even if he referred to the full court (IIRC) he needs two other justices to accept it.
The case had ZERO legal merit.
Wouldn't it be three? Don't you need 4 justices to bring it to the full court?
 
The Trumptards are now saying that the Texas Suite will overturn the election.
They are making a big deal about how the case has been docketed by the Supreme Court and means it will be heard.
That is BS. ANY case submitted to a court is docketed. The case the court just threw out was docketed.
Surprise; the Trumptards are living in la la land, with no understanding of how the legal process works.

At what point do they realize that this means nothing? In a week? In two? Basically being "docketed" means we stamped your fax "received" and filed it.
 
The tweet suggests the entire court ruled on this. No, Alito alone did. If Alito thinks the case has merit, he can accept the appeal, but even then, the full court doesn't need to hear it. He must be joined by two other justices. He basically cut it off at the knees. Which is what I expected.

The only thing that would have been better was if Amy Coney Barrett had written it.
 
The Trumptards are now saying that the Texas Suite will overturn the election.
They are making a big deal about how the case has been docketed by the Supreme Court and means it will be heard.
That is BS. ANY case submitted to a court is docketed. The case the court just threw out was docketed.
Surprise; the Trumptards are living in la la land, with no understanding of how the legal process works.

At what point do they realize that this means nothing? In a week? In two? Basically being "docketed" means we stamped your fax "received" and filed it.

Also you have to wonder why. The Texas suit makes the exact same argument that Mike Kelly's Pennsylvania suit made that Alito just tossed.
 
Also you have to wonder why. The Texas suit makes the exact same argument that Mike Kelly's Pennsylvania suit made that Alito just tossed.
Apparently, this goes a lot deeper than we thought. Even the conservatives on the SCOTUS are in on the fix, too. Along with various state Supreme courts, federal appeals judges, pizza shops, the Post Office, and more.
 
Stephen Miller isn't Trumpy enough now?

Lou Dobbs is a maniac tho, that's not phony.
In the 2000s he stirred up a lot of illegal-immigration hysteria, then I read some interview where he displayed a much softer stance. I just can't conceive of Dobbs having any genuine difference with Miller. It occurs to me maybe he is attacking some unnamed other Republicans. Bill Barr? He specifically criticizes the White House - WTF is he even talking about?

Re the highlighted- I think it was Meadmaker who's already pointed this out, but Paxton isn't even really alleging that the Biden wins in those states were "bogus" in the sense of being the result of fraud, but only as the result of the rules by which those states chose to run the elections in each.
I knew "bogus" wasn't quite the right word. "Invalid," maybe.

With Trump not only does he believe he was cheated out of the election win because he couldn't have actually lost, he sees the world as a matter of these transactions, if he does anything for you, you owe him.

But they don't owe him, the world doesn't work the way he's convinced it does.
Is it lost on him that he has zero leverage over SC justices? (Though he may very well have something on Kavanaugh.)
 
Apparently, this goes a lot deeper than we thought. Even the conservatives on the SCOTUS are in on the fix, too. Along with various state Supreme courts, federal appeals judges, pizza shops, the Post Office, and more.

All those Trumpalos have been thinking this ultra right wing SCOTUS would save their messiah from having to leave Washington DC. That they would ignore the law and demolish democracy just for him were in for a rude awakening.
 
Well, to be fair, there's been a lot of liberals going around for months saying that that's exactly what the SCOTUS would do.

But let's not be fair. The Trumpalos can all go die in a dumpster fire and decrease the surplus population.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom