• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

2020 United States presidential election - Conspiracy theories, alleged fraud, etc

Status
Not open for further replies.
Fox News is No longer a fair and balanced network, they are now to me a Nazi socialist media party network for the left.

I think they meant that Fox News is now no longer a Nazi fascist media party network for the right, but I'm not convinced that Fox has smartened up all that much.
 
Come to think of it, does it take an election conspiracy to never air those videos of Biden sniffing and fondling girls and women (not to mention burying Tara Reade's account)...??

Trump and his crew have lowered the bar to the point where unless we have 4k video of Biden hunting, cooking, and eating humans he's still a viable candidate.
 
Trump and his crew have lowered the bar to the point where unless we have 4k video of Biden hunting, cooking, and eating humans he's still a viable candidate.

Worse. Trump and his crew lowered the bar so much Trump was actually elected president, once.
 
Last edited:
I think they meant that Fox News is now no longer a Nazi fascist media party network for the right, but I'm not convinced that Fox has smartened up all that much.




Oodles of conservatives are quitting fox and choosing to newsmax.

Michele Malkin is sharp. Diamond and Silk are smart and entertaining.

Y'all must step up and be there or be square.
 
Because of how dishonest it makes your posts appear. Or rather, how much more dishonest.



Said the self appointed majorette of the *Bubba is dishonest narrative* Pep Squad.

Like all fake narratives, it requires regular maintenance.
 
Last edited:
I'd be happy to attack the source if you would provide one.


I usually do so 75%, excluding random FB comments y'all need to see, and items from email.


But there is the cult narrative again. "Bubba does not provide sources"


There actually was a source provided, associated with:


by Bubba View Post
I see "Avoid the material. Attack the source"
 
Last edited:
Are you . . .

Correct in my assessment of your posting history?

Yes, yes I am.

Pretending other's words are your own, posting without attributions or quotations is inherently dishonest. Period.
 
Last edited:
Correct in my assessment of your posting history?

Yes, yes I am.

Pretending other's words are your own, posting without attributions or quotations is inherently dishonest. Period.


There it is again. Assuming that posting words must mean that I pretend other's words are my own.

Whatever floats your narrative.

Watching you fail (to give up your chew toy) is incentive enough for posting random words from FB.

Remember, arguing with strangers online is a must do hobby because we all live forever. (Tell the others who dont know)
 
Last edited:
There it is again. Assuming I pretend other's words are my own.

Nope, it has been demonstrated when you went back and added attribution to some of your unattributed posts.

More dishonesty.
 
Nope, it has been demonstrated when you went back and added attribution to some of your unattributed posts.

More dishonesty.

Thats your opinion on why a poster would do so.

IOW your "Claim"

Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!

There are other (non-narrative friendly) reasons for editing, beyond your radar's horizon.
Dear Abaddon was also fond of shrieking that "edited" means dishonesty. (more narrative-slaving).
He seems to share your radar's horizon.

Fundies of all stripes hold that everyone should observe their rules for living. You are not skeptics.

There is actually a brilliant written piece addressing your horizon. It explains disparate vision. I will post it, when I have enough popcorn set aside.
 
Last edited:
"Claim" (bwah-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha).

Nope, myself and others have witnessed your postings without attribution and have called you on it, causing you to correct those posts.

More dishonesty on your part. You are almost too dishonest for anyone to take you seriously.
 
Last edited:
Nope, myself and others have witnessed your postings without attribution and have called you on it, causing you to correct those posts.

More dishonesty on your part. You are almost too dishonest for anyone to take you seriously.



of course, credule
 
She went on air drunk as a skunk, seven months ago. Murdoch kept her on when she had a purpose promoting Trump. That purpose has come to an end. There is no point in Fox losing sponsors, or being exposed to litigation to keep a pro-Trump person on air. Trump's gone.

https://www.theguardian.com/media/2...ro-appearance-fox-news-technical-difficulties

How that POS Pirro ever became a judge in the first place is beyond my understanding. She really is a nasty, nasty piece or work.

Oh, and Faux News cut away from a press briefing by Kayleigh McEnany, after she accused Democrats of rigging the election
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news...ews-cuts-off-kayleigh-mcenany-for-votes-spiel

And they have also criticised him for not conceding
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news...urn-on-trump-urging-him-to-concede-with-grace

Looks like Faux are turning on Trump, and that will be a bitter blow.

They will soon be "The Enemy of the People".
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom