2020 United States presidential election - Conspiracy theories, alleged fraud, etc

[ponderingturtle]

Voter fraud in the past fifty years has almost never occurred. That's stuff like casting someone else's absentee ballot, trying to vote more than once, voting when you're not registered or eligible, voting in a district other than where you live. The major university study that passed quickly under my eyes in the past few days (murky, so I don't recall citations or accurate details) identified on the order of 1,500 cases of voter fraud or attempted voter fraud in 2 billion votes cast. For any given vote in the 2020 Presidential election, that's a prior probably of p < 7.5 × 10^-7 that the vote was cast fraudulently.

He hasn't been charged with it but it was committed by Derek Chauvin by voting in Florida while residing in Minnesota. I would expect there is more voter fraud of that sort voting at your second home not your primary residence than people expect. Though of course this would only favor people who own second homes so there is likely some party bias in that.

 

[eerok]

Its someone's opinion.

As are most statements seen above.

Reality will prevail. There are no viable legal challenges to this election, just a mentally ill loser stirring up the rabble.

You seem not to realize that some opinions are better than others.

Will you accept reality when it bops you on the head?

 

[eerok]

On the subject of opinions, I'm basing mine on people like Ben Ginsberg, former Republican lawyer and election expert with 38 years of experience in such matters. He thinks Trump has no legitimate legal claim against the election.

But hey, Bubba's got some bozo on Facebook.

 

[Bubba]

...some bozo on Facebook.

..... has opined:

The people who were okay with Facebook and Twitter fact checking Posts ... should have no problem with a Supreme Court Judge fact-checking the votes. Meh, let them have their day. Judges follow the constitution to enforce the law.

 

[Bubba]

Reality will prevail. There are no viable legal challenges to this election, just a mentally ill loser stirring up the rabble.

You seem not to realize that some opinions are better than others.

Will you accept reality when it bops you on the head?

Do you accept reality of footage of a pre-pubescent girl abruptly pulling herself away from Biden's grasp as he touches her breast with the fingers of his left hand, after sniffing her hair?

 

[Bubba]

Come to think of it, does it take an election conspiracy to never air those videos of Biden sniffing and fondling girls and women (not to mention burying Tara Reade's account)...??

 

[dudalb]

I see "Avoid the material. Attack the source"

Yeah, like the reliability and track record of a source should not be taken into account when evaluating a source.

 

[eerok]

Do you accept reality of footage of a pre-pubescent girl abruptly pulling herself away from Biden's grasp as he touches her breast with the fingers of his left hand, after sniffing her hair?

That's not reality. That's just fevered imaginations at work.

 

[eerok]

The people who were okay with Facebook and Twitter fact checking Posts ... should have no problem with a Supreme Court Judge fact-checking the votes. Meh, let them have their day. Judges follow the constitution to enforce the law.

That's a non sequitur, but I agree with the second part. Let Trump have his day. Legally he can throw all the silly tantrums at the courts that he can dream up. He'll look like a spoiled brat and an idiot, but in fact that's his right. I'd be surprised if SCOTUS will touch this with a ten-foot pole, though.

 

[Dr. Keith]

Its someone's opinion.

As are most statements seen above.

That opinion contained a lot of assertions of fact. One might say claims of fact. That is where the hearty laughing is aimed, the lack of reality upon which that opinion is formed.

Luckily, Trump will have his day in court. So far that has been fruitful for the attorneys, but not Trump. I wonder how many attorneys involved in these legal wrangling will one day make it to the Supreme Court?

 

[Bubba]

by Bubba View Post
Do you accept reality of footage of a pre-pubescent girl abruptly pulling herself away from Biden's grasp as he touches her breast with the fingers of his left hand, after sniffing her hair?

That's not reality. That's just fevered imaginations at work.

It is quite clear that Biden's victim pulls away from his grasp when his fingers touch her breast.

At 0.32.

Youtube of course has censored thousands of uploads of this footage. One reason they gave had to with "sexual exploitation of children"....Indeed.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/5IYFOIYTQKoH/

 

[Bubba]

That opinion contained a lot of assertions of fact. One might say claims of fact.

Same as seen here every day. Some of the claims of fact, about blocking observers in PA, were proven by footage from inside and outside the counting room.

If the SC accepts it, they, not the MSM, and not some obnoxious clueless forum clown will decide.


Time will tell. Then it might be over.

 

[eerok]

It is quite clear that Biden's victim pulls away from his grasp when his fingers touch her breast.

At 0.32.

Youtube of course has censored thousands of uploads of this footage. One reason they gave had to with "sexual exploitation of children"....Indeed.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/5IYFOIYTQKoH/

I saw a video of Trump dry-humping an American flag. He had his hands all over the breast area, too.

 

[Bubba]

I saw a video of Trump dry-humping an American flag. He had his hands all over the breast area, too.

Please provide link, or it didnt happen

by Bubba View Post
It is quite clear that Biden's victim pulls away from his grasp when his fingers touch her breast.

At 0.32.

Youtube of course has censored thousands of uploads of this footage. One reason they gave had to with "sexual exploitation of children"....Indeed.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/5IYFOIYTQKoH/

 

[Resume]

Its someone's opinion.

No no no, claims are not evidence; one provides evidence for claims. You continually get this backwards.

 

[eerok]

Please provide link, or it didnt happen

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uE7peOmlTRk

 

[Bubba]

F Y I

Fox News as taken Judge Jeanine off the air because she was defending President Trump and she was saying their is clear signs of voter fraud. Fox News is No longer a fair and balanced network, they are now to me a Nazi socialist media party network for the left. Fox was the first network to call that Biden won Arizona without all the votes even being counted. Fox and Social media are working overtime squelching free speech, free thought and true undisputable facts with signed affidavits showing rampant voter fraud happening across our Nation. Networks and the social media expect us to just be quiet and to except this bogus election, this is only because they think of themselves as Gods and what they say and think is what we all must except.

-- seen on that internet

 

[Bubba]

I saw a video of Trump dry-humping an American flag. He had his hands all over the breast area, too.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uE7peOmlTRk

Oh my goodness its true, exactly as you described

 

[zorro99]

Hammer and Scorecard

He tricked the Bush administration into thinking he could detect terrorist signals in al Jazeera broadcasts. Now Dennis Montgomery has a new set of believers.

Will Sommer

Updated Nov. 09, 2020 3:14AM ET / Published Nov. 08, 2020 9:04PM ET

As Donald Trump refuses to concede the election, some of his most loyal allies have become obsessed with a bizarre new conspiracy theory about the race, insisting that Trump only lost the election because a deep-state supercomputer named “Hammer” and a computer program named “Scorecard” were used to change the ballot count.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/infamous-hoax-artist-behind-trumpworlds-new-voter-fraud-claim?ref=home

 

[Resume]

.

-- seen on that internet

From where did you plagiarize this?