Squeegee Beckenheim
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2010
- Messages
- 32,124
For context on Berman, his office is currently investigating Giuliani.
Sure. But the fact that the Constitution doesn't mention something doesn't mean that the laws passed by Congress are unconstitutional.
It was a warm June day filled with sunshine. The place where the event took place was a grassy field. Reporters noted that walking around on the grass did not get their shoes wet. I aver that if the grassy field was dry so was the hard surface of the ramp. Well, I suppose a groundskeeper could have sprayed the ramp with water just before Trump ended his speech.
I just think you laudable attempt to be fair went beyond what is reasonable. YMMV.
That's interesting. I'd never heard of such a thing.What's different is that he was not appointed by Trump, but by federal judges.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/19/nyregion/us-attorney-manhattan-trump.html
Essentially he's saying "You can't fire me because you never hired me." It'll be interesting to see how it shakes out.
For context on Berman, his office is currently investigating Giuliani.
Re: The highlighted, while they can't proactively make rulings, they can all but wave a flag, letting activists know that they can get a favourable ruling by getting a case to the Supreme Court.Perhaps Supreme court justices are good "value for the person". There are a couple of problems though;
- To get those supreme court justices, you need to have control of the presidency, and the senate.
- Justices are limited in what they can rule on.... cases must be presented to them (i.e. they can't proactively make rulings.)
- Even a 'friendly' judge may sometimes rule against you, if there is little or no ambiguity in the law. (Witness Gorsuch and the recent gay ruling)
A president may only be in power 4 or 8 years, but in that time they can issue executive orders over a much wider range of areas proactively, and while they may be constrained by law, they can also play a role in changing existing laws.
Susan Rice made some remarks on MSNBC that has set off the fauxrage machine.#Benghazi seems to be trending
“...remove Donald Trump and consign him and his supporters in the Senate to the trash heap of history.”
(I myself am Canadian too and I often almost make the mistake of connecting myself to the u.s. system. Guess it's a combination of the current dullness of the Canadian system along with the influence of the u.s. economically and socially.)
Mmm. It's well worth noting that not even remotely all "white" Christian churches are like that. Much about the US' Religious Right can be traced back to the white supremacist version of Christianity that the Confederacy made intrinsic to their power play, more specifically, and much about that can be traced back to the cotton industry in the southern states (which can be described as the most profitable industry that the world had ever known, at that point) and the motivated logic and power plays that the few that benefited most from it engaged in. The Religious Right =/= white Christianity, though.
One of the claims made by Bolton is that Trump offered to end an investigation into Turkish companies that violated Iranian sanctions that the Southern district of NY was doing.Trump's just making good on his promise to Erodgan, but now liberals are trying to spin this as a bad thing.
Erdogan? I'm not seeing the connection.
Hell, I’m not prepared to count him out after the votes are cast and counted.
He’ll go full meltdown.
Is there anything other than sanity to prevent a president from launching nukes on a US city? I don’t think it will come to that. This is more of an academic thing.
Or he'll just rationalize it in some way. My guess is that part of him is quite fed up with all the trouble.
After all, he doesn't launch them personally. My guess that those who do would object to the idea. Also, I frankly don't think he's that crazy.
Hans
He wouldn't even bomb Iran and NK when Bolton wanted him to.