• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Atheism - Obvious Default?

Silly question - If nobody is born with a "Santa exists and is real" belief, where did the first parents get the "Santa exists and is real" belief they passed on to their children? Do you believe everyone is born with a "Santa exists and is real" belief?

If everyone is born with religion, why do they need parents to pass it on at all?

If everyone is born with religion, how come different people are born with different religions, that just happen to be the religions of their parents/community (usually)?

That developing human brains have the default ability to develop beliefs doesn't mean any particular beliefs are a default of human brains.


Where did somebody claim that "everyone is born with religion"?
 
Where did somebody claim that "everyone is born with religion"?
Pedantic obfuscation perhaps? I'm happy if you replace "everyone" with "someone" as it doesn't change the context and content of the points made (which you haven't addressed).

Are you claiming some people are born with a god belief and some aren't?

Can you provide any credible evidence that anyone is born with a god belief?
 
Last edited:
Having no belief in anything is the default condition of all newborns.

Then by definition, all newborns are atheists. Disagree? Go ahead and state what god all newborns believe in.

You appear to be making the classic error of assume that atheism is a belief system. It isn't. It is merely a privative.
 
the thing about babies being born with no supernatural beliefs is a worthlessly trivial distraction to bother pointing out... Babies being born without things that they are built to develop later is meaningless.
Do you believe everyone is born with a "Santa exists and is real" belief?

If everyone is born with religion...

If everyone is born with religion...
That developing human brains have the default ability to develop beliefs doesn't mean any particular beliefs are a default of human brains.
:boggled: Weird.

You just responded to yourself with precisely how & why your own depiction of what somebody else had said did not represent what that person had actually said. And you did it in the very same post along with the original misrepresentation.

Instead of building a straw man and immediately calling yourself on it, why not just not build it?
 
Then by definition, all newborns are atheists. Disagree? Go ahead and state what god all some newborns believe in.

You appear to be making the classic error of assume that atheism is a belief system. It isn't. It is merely a privative.
FTFY ;)
 
I'm curious what your evidence is for this. It seems plausible but when you look at the most atheist countries, its a grab bag of prosperous western countries and not so prosperous former communist countries.


It's very difficult to come up with bulletproof evidence for this - the scope of scientific experiments is limited - but ...

1) The prosperous Western countries that you mention.
2) The former communist countries that you mention. They may not be as prosperous as the western countries we usually refer to, but the ones that remain irreligious tend to better off than the ones who don't.
3) Cuba, for instance, was seized by religion of the Afro-Cuban variety when the Special Period began.
4) Psychological experiments. If you make people insecure, they are more likely to be superstitious.
5) Professions where people tend towards superstition: They aren't usually the ones where people have both secure (!) and well-paying jobs. They are usually jobs with a high level of insecurity: professional sports, stockbrokers, performers, for instance.
6) Individual cases like the children in Beslan. Or the 'atheists in foxholes'. That there are no atheists at all is an obvious exaggeration, but the tendency that it describes isn't wrong.
7) The reasons why people believe: 'It makes me happy.' 'Have you heard the good news? 'I've never heard Christians tell me that the reason why they believe in God is that they sat down and seriously deduced that God must exist and they believe in him for this reason. I think you can find people like that online, but probably only when they are trying to legitimize religion to skeptics.
(When I was a child, we used to sing this song In my local Baptist church: "I am happy, I am happy, Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday, Saturday, Sunday. I am happy, I am happy, 'cause Jesus is my best friend")
8) Education is always mentioned as the reason why people stop believing in weird things, but even educated people seem to be just as much in denial about reality as uneducated people when confronted with death.

My collection of links: http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=9447804#post9447804
 
Then by definition, all newborns are atheists. Disagree? Go ahead and state what god all newborns believe in.

You appear to be making the classic error of assume that atheism is a belief system. It isn't. It is merely a privative.


No, I don't think that atheism is a religion.
You are the one who makes the mistake of thinking that there is only one kind of atheism, and you argue from the point of view of the most absurd one of them: an absence of belief.

Atheism is, in the broadest sense, an absence of belief in the existence of deities. Less broadly, atheism is a rejection of the belief that any deities exist. In an even narrower sense, atheism is specifically the position that there are no deities. Atheism is contrasted with theism, which, in its most general form, is the belief that at least one deity exists.
Atheism (Wikipedia)


According to your definiton, anybody in a coma is an atheist: They have no consciousness, so they have no idea of anything at all, so they don't believe in gods.
The faith of some atheists comes very close to religion!
 
:boggled: Weird.

You just responded to yourself with precisely how & why your own depiction of what somebody else had said did not represent what that person had actually said. And you did it in the very same post along with the original misrepresentation.

Instead of building a straw man and immediately calling yourself on it, why not just not build it?
Talk about "weird".

Neither of my two posts you quoted were a response to your post you quoted. Seems you have created the straw man. Please explain in more detail if I have misunderstood your post.
 
Pedantic obfuscation perhaps? I'm happy if you replace "everyone" with "someone" as it doesn't change the context and content of the points made (which you haven't addressed).

Are you claiming some people are born with a god belief and some aren't?

Can you provide any credible evidence that anyone is born with a god belief?


Where did somebody claim that anyone is born with religion?
 
Where did somebody claim that "everyone is born with religion"?

Pedantic obfuscation perhaps? I'm happy if you replace "everyone" with "someone" as it doesn't change the context and content of the points made (which you haven't addressed).

Are you claiming some people are born with a god belief and some aren't?

Can you provide any credible evidence that anyone is born with a god belief?


I would add ynot that any posting here who suggest that atheism is not the default position must be suggesting that theism is the default.
 
I would add ynot that any posting here who suggest that atheism is not the default position must be suggesting that theism is the default.
I'm sure some might claim agnosticism is the default :D.

I'm waiting for someone to claim "our" definition of atheism is that dogs, cats and rocks are atheists :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
No, I don't think that atheism is a religion.
You are the one who makes the mistake of thinking that there is only one kind of atheism, and you argue from the point of view of the most absurd one of them: an absence of belief.




According to your definiton, anybody in a coma is an atheist: They have no consciousness, so they have no idea of anything at all, so they don't believe in gods.
The faith of some atheists comes very close to religion!


Oh boy! What a jumbled up piece of scribble have we here.

Atheism not a religion but atheists having faith all mixed up in one post. :confused:
 
No, I don't think that atheism is a religion.
You are the one who makes the mistake of thinking that there is only one kind of atheism, and you argue from the point of view of the most absurd one of them: an absence of belief.
There's only one definition of "atheism" (not "atheist") that I accept as being valid - "Doesn't believe in a god or gods" - as it's the only definition that covers all atheists. There are many "kinds" of atheist however.
 
Well . . .

Heavily implies at the very least that somebody must be born with religion.


Yes, if you choose to neglect (or never read) what he wrote in an earlier post:

In another sense, atheism isn't an obvious default at all. Quite the opposite: It seems pretty clear that the default behavior among humans is to invent and believe in supernatural things.

But more importantly, it seems like the default behavior of humans is to invent and practice religion. A lot of atheists seem to think theism is the problem. I think the real issue is the religious impulse in humans, regardless of whether it incorporates a theos or not.


You obviously aren't born with something that you need to invent in order for it to exist. He seems to be saying that people have an innate tendency to turn to religion and superstition.
I disagree with him. I think that people have an innate tendency to find ways of making sense of the world. In specific circumstances this tendency makes them want to believe in weird things. And for most people, these circumstances have lasted from time immemorial until now if you consider the whole population of Earth.
Some of us, a more and more significant minority, are better off than the majority, however, to the extent where we don't even seriously consider the idea of gods anymore. We don't need them. And we tend to think of ourselves as irreligious or non-religious (or apatheists) rather than atheists: We think that it's a ******* waste of time to have a serious discussion about the existence of gods!
 
There's only one definition of "atheism" (not "atheist") that I accept as being valid - "Doesn't believe in a god or gods" - as it's the only definition that covers all atheists. There are many "kinds" of atheist however.


So you would also consider the comatose to be on your side, then. You could never seriously argue that they believe in a god or gods.
 
I'm sure some might claim agnosticism is the default :D.

I'm waiting for someone to claim "our" definition of atheism is that dogs, cats and rocks are atheists :rolleyes:


Why not? Do you claim that they are theists???
They seem to live up to the "only one definition of "atheism"" that you "accept as being valid - "Doesn't believe in a god or gods"".
 
So you would also consider the comatose to be on your side, then. You could never seriously argue that they believe in a god or gods.
No - Ever wondered why people don't go to sleep as theists and wake up as atheists? Hint - They never lose their belief, they merely temporarily lose their consciousness of it, but they retain it subconsciously.
 
Last edited:
Why not? Do you claim that they are theists???
They seem to live up to the "only one definition of "atheism"" that you "accept as being valid - "Doesn't believe in a god or gods"".

Oh dear!!!

Okay, I'll play your silly game . . .

Theism and atheism are uniquely the products of human brains. Do you think dogs, cats and rocks have human brains? :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
There's only one definition of "atheism" (not "atheist") that I accept as being valid - "Doesn't believe in a god or gods" - as it's the only definition that covers all atheists. There are many "kinds" of atheist however.

So you would also consider the comatose to be on your side, then. You could never seriously argue that they believe in a god or gods.


I think dann missed the point in spectacular fashion ynot.

There are male, female and even transgender atheists. Big ones, little ones, white ones, black and brown ones. Need I go on?
 

Back
Top Bottom