No. You are posting on a skeptic forum where idiotic ideas are pulled apart by skeptics. You seem to be struggling with that concept as you keep coming back to be made fun of. 
No. You struggle to spell words, write complete sentences and you contradict your own claims.
Why not. You claimed angels disguise themselves using radioactivity. Can't we laugh at all your claims?
Stop lying. Einstein's cosmological constant only defined a finite closed universe.
Liar. This is what you wrote.... Why do you lie so much?
Learn to spell basic words. The word is "instantaneous."
Go post your "god crap" on a Christian forum.
Matthew you calling me a liar is like a mule calling a rooster "Bighead." As far as what Einstein said, it is evident from his quotes. Like I said, folks don't know their science.
You criticize my spelling skills of such a "basic" word such as "instantaneous" whereas you try to pass as you do not understand the full definition of the word "apply" and you make yourself look like you are cognitively lacking. Not to mention I can write whatever I have written so far in these forums in two languages, being that I have graduated from a greek highschool in Greece (you? What have you written in any language other than mediocre to abnoxiously arrogant, banal and cliche criticism of the work of others?) Intelligence is compartamentalized, but usually in different sectors. As in you can be a genius in physics but trip when you try to dribble a soccer ball. But to have on and off intelligence within tbe same sector, as in your case, now that is a rarity; unless there is a medical/cognitive condition involved and/or if impaired by drugs or alcohol.
Infinitism in principle attempts to delve in any philosophical concept and answer every aspect of the human experience, without living any stone unturned, honestly and without fear of criticism, or harm of reputation whatsoever. To that end, when people claim that they had alien visitations or when it is written in the Bible that people had vision of Angels, I attempted to rationalize it, in the process of responding to an argument of yours. Thinking back then that the only possible means of traversing light years of distances would be if a vehicle would travel with the speed of light, which such trip beings could not survive, unless they managed to switch to light themselves and back on (do you detect the character of the phrase here - I mean you believe in multiple futures; and therefore, with holograms of ourselves in them)? Or unless the "beholders" were either on heavy medication or going through a period of strenuous fasting.
Quote from the original:
" Since we will never be able to travel light-speed, we will never be able to visit inhabited planets further into the galaxy and will never be visited by organic species from the depths of the galaxy, because these are impossible distances to traverse otherwise. Light-speed travelers would need to be able to perceive what is in front of them in time to avoid collisions. Given that they would be travelling in the same speed as light does, the rays of their spaceship's radars will be travelling towards their destination with the same speed. They would not be able to tell what lies ahead, in order to be able to react in time, to avoid colliding with objects appearing in front of them, even with the use of navigating systems operated by powerful computers. Even if they did manage to travel light-speed and did so only in "empty" space; as mentioned earlier, their spacecraft would be alight and destroyed to ash and dust due to friction alone, before they reached fractions of light speed. Do I need to get into the type of steering and break system they would need? And no, time would not be affected (since it does not actually exist) and the travelers would not travel in it. Neither the effect to their brains bouncing in their skulls, or to their other organs, would be any less detrimental because they travel light speed; nor would their blood and other body vessels fare any better, or their cells and the very molecules that comprise them. Because part of the problem is not just accelerating to light speed, making it through the friction and navigating among giant objects in space; it is also slowing down in time to avoid collision, and the whiplash and the other aforementioned effects to a living organism (not even any insects on board would perhaps make the trip). So no living breathing species could have ever possibly reached, or will ever possibly reach Earth; unless they were or will be able to navigate by other means than following the path of light (shortcuts of the universe), or they come from stars in close proximity, or unless they are other forms of energy + intelligence + matter combination. For one they shouldn't have to breath, drink, eat and move their bowels; no time to sleep from all that bouncing, the noise, and the heat from all that friction ( For comparison: Boeing 737 take off speed: 70 m/sec * Maximum allowed Boeing 737 cruise speed at 27,000: 252 m/sec * Lockheed SR-71 Blackbird max speed: 980 m/sec * automobile at 70 mph: 31 m/sec * Light Speed: 299,792,458 m/sec)."
