who did 9/11 according to the latest pusher of a woo paper
I'm a student. Any evidence Mr Schneider provides will prove the truth-seeker movement is making progress
towards the TRUTH concerning the events of September eleventh 2001.
Is not a truth seeker movement, it is a who can publish the dumbest paper based on wild speculation and ignore facts and evidence.
The truth is, 19 terrorists (gullible idiots) were instructed by UBL's buddies on how faking Hijcaking (
Means) in the USA would give them time to take over jets by killing pilots who sit facing forward in their seats. Then take jets and crash into building to kill Americans. A promise UBL made in the 90s, the intent to kill Americans when and where he could. UBL promised to do this - did you miss this
Motive? UBL and his hate for the USA.
Thus a paper thinking Bazant's paper was about 9/11 fails. 9/11 was a crime, not a science paper. The fires which resulted after aircraft impacts caused the collapse of the WTC, any person capable of research and understanding can figure out fire caused the collapse - If the 9/11 truth paper claims aircraft impacts and fire can't do it, failed.
Unfortunately 9/11 truth lies based on ignorance will continue to have idiots like Ansgar thinking there is some official theory, and try to refute reality with a paper which ignores who did 9/11, 19 terrorists.
The key to 19 terrorists scoring 75 percent on their targets was how the USA responds to Hijackings... DBCooper, etc, etc. There are still hijackers avoiding extradition from the 60s or 70s in the USA. Do you have knowledge of why the terrorists suceeded in faking the hijacking. Any clue why they failed to get Flight 93 to the target, because the first people in a position to take action on the truth of fake hijacking, it was murder, stopped the terrorists risking all, paying the price to stop failed UBL followers, which remind me of 9/11 truth followers - unable to think for themselves, 19 terrorists are like 9/11 truth followers, gullible.
The key to 9/11 was how the US reacts to hijacking - a fact 9/11 truth could not figure out from the beginning.
The truth about 9/11 is 19 terrorists, not a study of why building fail in fire, or 9/11 truth failure to understand fire, steel, and science.
The dolt Ansgar (a dolt with respect to all things 9/11).
(Ansgar - "there is only one scientific explanation, namely that all three skyscrapers were intentionally destroyed.")
Yes, but the 19 terrorists had no clue the towers would collapse due the impacts and fire, but it was intentional, 19 terrorists wanted to kill Americans.
It is sad to see another failed 9/11 truth nut ignore fire, and who did 9/11. BTW, Bazant's paper was academic, the WTC failure in fire is a fact seen on 9/11, and 99.9 percent of all engineers agree (it was fire). Most engineers, and people in general understand steel fails in fire. A short study of the towers reveals why they towers failed due to the impacts.
If the paper fails to discuss what and how the steel of the WTC was protected from fire - we have a paper with a failed conclusion.
(Ansgar - "there is only one scientific explanation, namely that all three skyscrapers were intentionally destroyed.")
There is no evidence for Ansgar's conclusion, unless he means the terrorists did it, the 19 in the planes. How does he explain flight 77 and 93?
If 19 terrorists did not do 9/11, better give your evidence to the FBI. Oops, you and the new guy have no evidence. No Pulitzer for the new guy. He can get a woo award.
UBL was a suspect (according to me) when I understood a second plane impacted the WTC. I speculated he had bought his own planes and filled them with explosives, until I figured out the speed of impact which gave the planes the energy of a two ton bomb at impact (and the fact four jets with passenger were taken).
Yes, be the best student, ignore the murderers who callously took four planes and intending to end the passengers lives using them, the plane, their baggage, the fuel, all as kinetic energy weapons - murdering crew and pilots to take the planes. Ignore the bad guys, go with woo. The best anti-intellectual action to take, and it dovetails with 9/11 truth's goal, spread lies, apologize for 9/11 murderers, 19 terrorists fooled by UBL.
Did you miss UBL promise to kill Americans? Were you alive in the 90s?
)