Archie Gemmill Goal
Banned
- Joined
- Nov 18, 2015
- Messages
- 8,324
Because they have a bilateral agreement with the UK on this question, which has nothing to do with the EU.
An agreement which can be scrapped unilaterally at any time.
Because they have a bilateral agreement with the UK on this question, which has nothing to do with the EU.
Steven Barclay, the Brexit secretary once again attempting to reenact the "Nobody move or the ****** gets it !" scene from Blazing Saddles:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-49223319
It concerns me that British government ministers are still so delusional. Do they not understand that the EU will always put its political interest ahead of narrow economic issues?
It concerns me that British government ministers are still so delusional. Do they not understand that the EU will always put its political interest ahead of narrow economic issues?
The only goal is to attempt to shift the blame to the EU. Brexiteers will buy it. Because Brexiteers are either thick or ideologically driven to accept whatever they want to be true or, often, both.
They're gambling that a big enough economic catastrophe looming nearer will make the political interests seem less important.
It concerns me that British government ministers are still so delusional. Do they not understand that the EU will always put its political interest ahead of narrow economic issues?
Well at least going by the public statements, the British (including Boris Johnson) were convinced that German car makers and Italian cheese producers would be able to strong arm their governments into conceding to whatever the British demanded, only because they wanted to sell their goods in the UK.
Here's a very interesting idea from Fintan O'Toole in today's The Irish Times.
https://www.irishtimes.com/opinion/...an-stop-a-no-deal-brexit-here-s-how-1.3972121
Read the article for more.
Thoughts ?
I do love the idea that a vote failing, that would have passed if all Brexit-supporting MPs had voted for it, is somehow the fault of the remain supporting MPs.
That's some seriously delusional ********.
But I suppose if you are a believer in Brexit and the sunny uplands, then going all White Queen probably seems perfectly reasonable.
Yup, it's like blaming the vegetarians when the meat eaters cannot decide between the chicken and the beef for dinner.
Vegetarians are inherently evil. Don't compare me to one please
Anyway, a sensible answer to that conundrum is "both", which is inapplicable for Brexit I'm afraid.
McHrozni
In a way it is, except the both would be getting beef or chicken for dinner while at the same time keeping the cows and chickens alive for milk and eggs and then blaming the vegetarians for not enabling this.
And lets face it, promising contradictory results, without explaining how to get those results and then blaming everyone else for not delivering is exactly like the brexit has been handled from the beginning.
You're missing the main fact that the "deal" they were voting on was a remain-led one. So the opposition wouldn't vote for it because, essentially, they're the opposition and vote against almost all government proposals; and the Brexit-supporting MPs wouldn't vote for it because it wasn't a proper Brexit - it was so weak and watered down that remaining would have been better.I do love the idea that a vote failing, that would have passed if all Brexit-supporting MPs had voted for it, is somehow the fault of the remain supporting MPs.
That's some seriously delusional ********.
But I suppose if you are a believer in Brexit and the sunny uplands, then going all White Queen probably seems perfectly reasonable.
Because they aren't competent enough to come up with a deal that commands majority support in Parliament and which upholds the GFA and which is acceptable to the EU.You don't understand do you? The Leave MPs got exactly what they wanted - the "deal" was defeated. How can you possibly portray that as incompetence?