ok, let's reverse this.
How was the East Coast, or Silicon Valley, or plenty of other thriving places in the US favored over the Rust Belt? Was there some government initiative that helped there but not elsewhere? Were critical resources withheld?
Is there any policy that caused the decline or prevented the recovery?
I think there are factors at play beyond politics, and for some reason, one party gets more blame than the other, when probably neither could have realistically done much to prevent it.
And economists agree that NAFTA helped US farmers, but of course some more than others.
There are factors beyond politics, yes. To delve slightly further, though, and touch on a couple relevant points, because politics and the economy are deeply related...
Policy-wise, the Democratic Party's economic policies are generally notably better for the average American, very much including rural voters. Even moreso, I would dare to say that Democrats favor economic policy that's overwhelmingly better for rural voters. The key underlying concept there, though, is likely how influential corporate interests are on the Party's policy. Corporate interests, which largely are not good for rural areas, have made significant inroads in getting their wishlists enacted into law, with the help of a notable chunk of Democrats. Usually, the more conservative or "moderate" Democrats, for that matter, which is one of the notable underlying causes of friction within the Democratic Party. With that said, Democratic Party messaging focus tends to be focused on people of color, urban areas, and various smaller minorities and largely ignores rural white folk. Further, Democratic Party messaging frequently doesn't embrace the values of said rural folk as well as urban folk.
Current Republican Party policy, on the other hand, has been effectively turned over to corporate interests. Naturally, that leads to policy that is, at best, neutral towards rural folk and frequently harmful to them. It's long been that way, of course, but the current state of affairs harkens more to the time before the Great Depression (that led to the Great Depression) than to, say, the 1980's. Even so, the Republican Party's messaging and strategies tend to focus much more on them, which... matters quite a bit, really. Going further, though, rural (white) folk have long held a distinctly disproportionate amount of political power, especially in the South, and have frequently acted to tip the scales towards themselves. With measures like the Civil Rights Act of 1965 and various things since, Democrats established themselves as the people that were taking away the disproportionate power that the rural white folk had long accepted as the way things should be. Naturally, Republicans exploited the multiple sources of discontent related to that quite effectively.
Ehh. I'm just going to move on, though.
Can we take the sudden change of subject as an admission that you have no evidence that Trump is telling the truth when he claims to have helped out the first responders in the aftermath of 9/11? Can you explain, then, on what basis you have come to believe that it is true?
This time, the claim was more mild, was it not? Just that he had been there, but was not a first responder.
Yeah... That's a bit more detail, again, for one of the likely very under-reported stories for this administration.
China is doing very badly, worst year in 27 - was supposed to start buying our agricultural product now - no signs that they are doing so.
*flips the bird at Trump*
It's intentional BS, of course. No point in trying to reason with intentional BS.
Speaking of things that earn such disrespectful gestures...
Rand Paul Offers to Buy Rep. Omar A Ticket To Somalia
Yeah... *flips the bird at Rand Paul*
There was a 2 year span in which the Republicans controlled both the white house, and congress. Yet instead of dealing with infrastructure then, they decided to 1) pass a tax cut plan that spiked the deficit, and 2) attack Obamacare.
The fact that Trump is acting so concerned about infrastructure now seems to be nothing more than a publicity stunt.
He was acting similarly concerned during those years, too! As the Republicans pushed a plan to just sell off a whole bunch of infrastructure to corporate interests as their plan for how to deal with it.
In more serious problematic foreign influence matters...
Trump aide submitted drafts of 2016 'America First' energy speech to UAE for edits, emails show
Foreign Policy speech on Russia written by a Russian lobbyist and now this? Yeah, the American people have overwhelming cause to be concerned about whether Trump is in the pockets of foreign powers.
Four Florida county election systems were infiltrated by Russia, Senate committee confirms
The picture keeps being shown to be worse. Too bad that Trump and McConnell are actively working against those trying to act on the problems.
Here's
a little round up of a few of the "highlights" from the Senate report on Russian Active Measures and Interference, incidentally.
For example,
1. (U) Russian Access to Election Infrastructure: Illinois
(U) In June 2016, Illinois experienced the first known breach by Russian actors of state election infrastructure during the 2016 election.[146] As of the end of 2018, the Russian cyber actors had successfully penetrated Illinois's voter registration database, viewed multiple database tables, and accessed up to 200,000 voter registration records.[147] The compromise resulted in the exfiltration of an unknown quantity of voter registration data.[148] Russian cyber actors were in a position to delete or change voter data, but the Committee is not aware of any evidence that they did so.[149]
• [REDACTED] DHS assesses with high confidence that the penetration was carried out by Russian actors.[150]
• (U/ [REDACTED]) The compromised voter registration database held records relating to 14 million registered voters, [REDACTED REDACTED REDACTED REDACTED REDACTED REDACTED REDACTED]. The records exfiltrated included information on each voter's name, address, partial social security number, date of birth, and either a driver's license number or state identification number.[151]
That, alone, shows that efforts to strengthen security are greatly overdue.
On a totally different topic...
Sentencing is Symbolic: In One Georgia County Harsher Burglary Sentences had No Effect on Recidivism
Of note, the data is obviously limited. Still, it's in agreement with what a number of supporters for reform expect, I think. After a certain, relatively low bar, harsher sentences have a negligible effect for many crimes, both for reform and for deterrence.