Belz...
Fiend God
Well, that's just your opinion, maaan.
No, it's the opinion of intelligence professionals in the US and abroad.
What basis do you have for discounting their conclusions, other than Trump being your guy?
Well, that's just your opinion, maaan.
Your "demographic"? You mean "smart people" who are liberals, because all smart people are liberals, right?My demographic wasn't a target.
Well, that's just your opinion, maaan.
You mean "smart people" who are liberals, because all smart people are liberals, right?
Opinion, schminion.No, it's the opinion of intelligence professionals in the US and abroad.
What basis do you have for discounting their conclusions, other than Trump being your guy?
<whooosh>That doesn't even make logical sense. Get your **** together, man.
Opinion, schminion.
And FFS, why do you people assume everyone who detests liberalism are Trumpophiles?
<whooosh>
With tens of thousands of posts under your belt on this forum alone, I would never have expected you to be unable to recognise sarcasm when you see it.Your post still makes no logical sense. I suspect you were trying to make a point, and failed miserably.
Thank God we live in a Country where one is presumed innocent until proven guilty. It seems many believe that one is presumed guilty until exonerated. God Bless America and President Trump.
Chris B.
With tens of thousands of posts under your belt on this forum alone, I would never have expected you to be unable to recognise sarcasm when you see it.
Stupid? The irony. Just in case you still don't get it, I was saying that [many if not most] liberals think that simply styling themselves as 'liberal' (and make no mistake, it is largely empty posturing, virtue-signalling) makes them look smart. My opinion is that, like marxism/leftism generally, anyone who still cleaves to such a demonstrably destructive, so-called ideology into adulthood is simply weak-minded.I considered it, but given how stupid your sarcasm was, I decided to give you the benefit of the doubt.
Seems like I was wrong: you can't even pull off sarcasm correctly.
Belz... said:Oooh, those scary, scary SMERSH operatives! The US's own intelligence agencies were helpless in the face of this sophisticated psy-assault on the minds of "tens of millions of Americans".
If you'll allow your sarcasm to subside for a moment and engage your cerebral cortex for more than a few seconds to tie your shoelaces, you'll realise that online campaigns can be very difficult to spot and counter. Besides the hacking episodes, the Russians did most of the work in the form of social media disinformation. It's not easy to detect and stop. It's the new face of state-to-state interference, and it'll take a while to adapt to it properly. Either way, and regardless of which parties or individuals are supported by such foreign efforts, you should be worried that they are ongoing and campainging for counter-efforts to be made.
No?
It doesn't matter, as they're using that narrative already. You're right in that the best way to combat Trump is to bury him through the voting booth, but those Trumpistas are coming out to vote no matter what. What are they going to do with a knife-in-the-back narrative, vote harder?I am opposed 100 percent to impeachment. . . . We cannot afford to give the failed genetic experiments and products of incest who go to his rallies a knife in the back narrative. We know what their kind do with such narratives and we should not provide the opportunity.
If you'll allow your sarcasm to subside for a moment and engage your cerebral cortex for more than a few seconds to tie your shoelaces, you'll realise that online campaigns can be very difficult to spot and counter. Besides the hacking episodes, the Russians did most of the work in the form of social media disinformation. It's not easy to detect and stop. It's the new face of state-to-state interference, and it'll take a while to adapt to it properly. Either way, and regardless of which parties or individuals are supported by such foreign efforts, you should be worried that they are ongoing and campainging for counter-efforts to be made.
No?