Status
Not open for further replies.
Well, that's just your opinion, maaan.

What stupid people think "Opinions are like buttholes, everybody has one."

What smart people understand "Opinions are like buttholes, you should have yours checked by an expert regularly and if they tell you something is wrong with it, you should take that seriously."
 
Last edited:
No, it's the opinion of intelligence professionals in the US and abroad.

What basis do you have for discounting their conclusions, other than Trump being your guy?
Opinion, schminion.

And FFS, why do you people assume everyone who detests liberalism are Trumpophiles? Is your thinking really that crass?
 
Opinion, schminion.

Do you have any contribution to make to discussions other than soundbites and sarcasm? Why are you even here?

And FFS, why do you people assume everyone who detests liberalism are Trumpophiles?

Oops, now you made another mistake. No one here made that assumption. First, it was a question, and second, it's experience, not assumption.

Third, I'd wager real money that you have no idea what liberalism is, just like your polar opposites have no idea what conservatism is.

<whooosh>

Your post still makes no logical sense. I suspect you were trying to make a point, and failed miserably.
 
Your post still makes no logical sense. I suspect you were trying to make a point, and failed miserably.
With tens of thousands of posts under your belt on this forum alone, I would never have expected you to be unable to recognise sarcasm when you see it.
 
Thank God we live in a Country where one is presumed innocent until proven guilty. It seems many believe that one is presumed guilty until exonerated. God Bless America and President Trump.

Chris B.

LOL apparently presumption of innocence means you can never investigate, prosecute or convict anyone of a crime.
 
With tens of thousands of posts under your belt on this forum alone, I would never have expected you to be unable to recognise sarcasm when you see it.

I considered it, but given how stupid your sarcasm was, I decided to give you the benefit of the doubt.

Seems like I was wrong: you can't even pull off sarcasm correctly.
 
I considered it, but given how stupid your sarcasm was, I decided to give you the benefit of the doubt.

Seems like I was wrong: you can't even pull off sarcasm correctly.
Stupid? The irony. Just in case you still don't get it, I was saying that [many if not most] liberals think that simply styling themselves as 'liberal' (and make no mistake, it is largely empty posturing, virtue-signalling) makes them look smart. My opinion is that, like marxism/leftism generally, anyone who still cleaves to such a demonstrably destructive, so-called ideology into adulthood is simply weak-minded.
 
Belz... said:
Oooh, those scary, scary SMERSH operatives! The US's own intelligence agencies were helpless in the face of this sophisticated psy-assault on the minds of "tens of millions of Americans".

If you'll allow your sarcasm to subside for a moment and engage your cerebral cortex for more than a few seconds to tie your shoelaces, you'll realise that online campaigns can be very difficult to spot and counter. Besides the hacking episodes, the Russians did most of the work in the form of social media disinformation. It's not easy to detect and stop. It's the new face of state-to-state interference, and it'll take a while to adapt to it properly. Either way, and regardless of which parties or individuals are supported by such foreign efforts, you should be worried that they are ongoing and campainging for counter-efforts to be made.

No?

нет
 
I must say IsThisTheLife it is truly lucky for all of us that you just amazingly appeared, with full knowledge of this board and all its posters history already available to you, to fill in the blank left the by the flouncing and banning of so many unjustly persecuted conservative posters.

It truly is a miracle.
 
I am opposed 100 percent to impeachment. . . . We cannot afford to give the failed genetic experiments and products of incest who go to his rallies a knife in the back narrative. We know what their kind do with such narratives and we should not provide the opportunity.
It doesn't matter, as they're using that narrative already. You're right in that the best way to combat Trump is to bury him through the voting booth, but those Trumpistas are coming out to vote no matter what. What are they going to do with a knife-in-the-back narrative, vote harder?

Democrats need to forget about polling, stop worrying about what the Senate will do, and defend the Constitution as is their sworn duty. The whole argument for impeachment is that the POTUS has acted outside the bounds of the Constitution. With ample evidence to indicate his transgressions, Congress is shirking their duty if they fail to impeach. Plus, once impeachment hearings are opened, I assume it will be easier to get key players, e.g., Mueller, to testify before Congress. That will create an environment in which more Senate Republicans will be pressured into defecting back into reality.
 
If you'll allow your sarcasm to subside for a moment and engage your cerebral cortex for more than a few seconds to tie your shoelaces, you'll realise that online campaigns can be very difficult to spot and counter. Besides the hacking episodes, the Russians did most of the work in the form of social media disinformation. It's not easy to detect and stop. It's the new face of state-to-state interference, and it'll take a while to adapt to it properly. Either way, and regardless of which parties or individuals are supported by such foreign efforts, you should be worried that they are ongoing and campainging for counter-efforts to be made.

No?

The ones who should worry are political parties that depend on enough stupid people susceptible to psy-ops to get elected.

Have you ever fallen for disinformation campaigns?
 
Trump Tweets

The Greatest Presidential Harassment in history. After spending $40,000,000 over two dark years, with unlimited access, people, resources and cooperation, highly conflicted Robert Mueller would have brought charges, if he had ANYTHING, but there were no charges to bring!


Russia, Russia, Russia! That’s all you heard at the beginning of this Witch Hunt Hoax...And now Russia has disappeared because I had nothing to do with Russia helping me to get elected. It was a crime that didn’t exist. So now the Dems and their partner, the Fake News Media,.....

....say he fought back against this phony crime that didn’t exist, this horrendous false accusation, and he shouldn’t fight back, he should just sit back and take it. Could this be Obstruction? No, Mueller didn’t find Obstruction either. Presidential Harassment!
 
BTW, as far as impeachment goes, you people are delusional if you believe the rhetoric coming from Democrat politicians and DC-ites generally. Never. Going. To. Happen. What we're witnessing are the last gasps of what's never been anything but a smokescreen, a snowjob distracting from the real, entrenched corruption and criminality there which took root decades ago.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom