Could you or Ed explain for those of us who are either to dimwited or lingistically chalenged to get that?That wasn't what I meant, and you know it.![]()
That wasn't what I meant, and you know it.![]()
Ahh. this wouldn't have anything to do with any double entendres in relation to coalition of the "willing" would it?If there were never any self-consciously willfull misunderstandings there would be no humor. We would all be melancholy we would .... never mind
(c'mon Kerberos, you get that allusion, don't you?)
Ahh. this wouldn't have anything to do with any double entendres in relation to coalition of the "willing" would it?
Could you or Ed explain for those of us who are either to dimwited or lingistically chalenged to get that?
Yuppsie. That and Hamlet.
That Denmark perhaps have more freedom of speech than the US?
I bet you can even say naughty words and show a bit of skin on tv without people calling their lawyers in Denmark![]()
Indeed.
I note how I have not come across even a mention of this in the US press. I suspect that it upsets their delicate sensibilities to even draw attention to such an un-PCish thing. They will protect us.
What's special about those two? I've only looked at the Torygraph link (and nobody takes anything from there for granted), but why have the other 10 not felt "forced" into hiding? Is there perhaps an attempt by the sadder element to identify themselves with Theo Van Gogh?... and two of its cartoonists have been forced into hiding.
The ambassadors of 11 Muslim countries called on Anders Fogh Rasmussen, the prime minister, to take "necessary steps" against the "defamation of Islam".
But Mr Rasmussen, the head of a centre-Right minority coalition dependent for its survival on support from an anti-foreigner party, called the cartoons a "necessary provocation" and refused to act.
I bet you can even say naughty words and show a bit of skin on tv without people calling their lawyers in Denmark![]()
Some stripper and some politician in the [building where all the politicians are] a few years ago. Was aired around 1500 or something.Sure.
Indeed.
I note how I have not come across even a mention of this in the US press. I suspect that it upsets their delicate sensibilities to even draw attention to such an un-PCish thing. They will protect us.
Or it could be that there are more important things to report than news about a cartoon in Denmark.
Like whether or not Tyra Banks' breasts are real.
at least they evince some balls.....
This is a slight digression, but it makes me wonder if there will be protests that the History Channel is doing a series on The Crusades? On the other hand the part of the begining that I saw might make the whole thing a prpaganda too for Islamists.
To explain, briefly, there was a portrayal of Pope Urban, as a slightly mad and highly devious fanatic starting the Crusades to liberate the Holy Land from the infidels and those who signed up would be guaranteed either whatever riches they could plunder or a full pass to heaven if they died, with all sins forgiven.
Change a few names and the whole sorry story could have been OBL and his minions today.
Has the church apologized for this one, yet?
Cicciolina? She did her trick in Norway, partly undressing in the Senate.Some stripper and some politician in the [building where all the politicians are] a few years ago. Was aired around 1500 or something.
You remember that?
Because i'm sure someone would be interested in a linky to that. And i don't know how to find it.
Sincerely
Tobias
Cicciolina wasn't the first female member of the Italian Parliament, but she was doubtless the most famous internationally.
Her public notoriety as a porn star is what drew people to her campaign rallies. That, plus the fact that her political speeches always included a glimpse of her left breast and sometimes even a complete striptease. After winning a seat in Parliament, Cicciolina continued acting in adult videos for another two years.