horrifying attack on Jussie Smollett

Status
Not open for further replies.
UPDATE: After Jussie Smollett turned over "limited & redacted" phone records, Chicago police spokesman @AJGuglielmi tells @ABC7Chicago "We are very appreciative of the victim's cooperation however the records provided do not meet the burden for a criminal investigation..."

To think of the thousands of hours wasted on this hoax and his race grifter supporters fills me with contempt.
 
Since no one will ever get caught Smollett gets to claim this happened for the rest of his life

And you guys will still be in this thread belittling his claim for that same time period.

There's been absolutely nothing new in over a week, yet the disbelievers have found mutual cause to celebrate their lack of findings for six or seven new pages.

Be less obvious, gang!
 
The screen shot is from the manager's phone and as far as I know the police have never "arrived" there.


ETA: Sigh. I'm not sure about this now. Can't find a reliable report of where his manager was in relation to the condo. I found one report that said he was taken to the hospital by his manager. Earlier in this thread there were reports he'd gone to the hospital on his own but I can't find a source for that.

Manager was in California.

Friend took Smollett to hospital.

Okay, one more try.

Jussie Smollett should have simply shown the police his phone screen when they arrived so that they would have some indication that he was indeed talking to his manager on the phone at the time of the attack.

That would have ended suspicion by the police about that, since the officers would at least have seen good evidence that the phone call part of the story was true.
 
And you guys will still be in this thread belittling his claim for that same time period.

There's been absolutely nothing new in over a week, yet the disbelievers have found mutual cause to celebrate their lack of findings for six or seven new pages.

Be less obvious, gang!

Hi! 1. there have been new things, all of them detrimental to the race hoax

2. Take a gander at this sentence, closely, with the eye of a skeptic: "There's been absolutely nothing new in over a week, yet the disbelievers have found mutual cause to celebrate their lack of findings for six or seven new pages." Now, why would "disbelievers" ( :rolleyes: ) celebrate the "lack of findings"? I betcha if one put their noodle to it, one would recognize that the egg did not end up in the ramen bowl, but rather on our correspondents face.

Be less obvious, k?
 
And you guys will still be in this thread belittling his claim for that same time period.

There's been absolutely nothing new in over a week, yet the disbelievers have found mutual cause to celebrate their lack of findings for six or seven new pages.

Be less obvious, gang!

Less obvious about what? ......Racism!!!1!?
 
Manager was in California.
Friend took Smollett to hospital.
That's what I thought too however now I'm not sure. As I said in my edit I've found conflicting reports of that.

If you believe this however, do you realize that the screen shot the police say they have could not have been obtained in Chicago because the phone would have been with his manager in California?


Okay, one more try.

Jussie Smollett should have simply shown the police his phone screen when they arrived so that they would have some indication that he was indeed talking to his manager on the phone at the time of the attack.
How do you know he didn't?
 
Last edited:
UPDATE: After Jussie Smollett turned over "limited & redacted" phone records, Chicago police spokesman @AJGuglielmi tells @ABC7Chicago "We are very appreciative of the victim's cooperation however the records provided do not meet the burden for a criminal investigation..."

To think of the thousands of hours wasted on this hoax and his race grifter supporters fills me with contempt.

One bourbon...one scotch...and one beeeeeeer....
 
Hi! 1. there have been new things, all of them detrimental to the race hoax

2. Take a gander at this sentence, closely, with the eye of a skeptic: "There's been absolutely nothing new in over a week, yet the disbelievers have found mutual cause to celebrate their lack of findings for six or seven new pages." Now, why would "disbelievers" ( :rolleyes: ) celebrate the "lack of findings"? I betcha if one put their noodle to it, one would recognize that the egg did not end up in the ramen bowl, but rather on our correspondents face.

Be less obvious, k?

There has been no new evidence of any sort. Remember when you used to be a skeptic? There has been as much to support his story as there has been to falsify it. Specifically,.... zilch.

And since the closing line was apparently too subtle for you, perhaps others would like to take note of the usual suspects and the number of posts in the thread for each. THERE. IS. NO. NEW. REPORTING. You guys are just raking up the muck re-stating your very subjective opinions over and over.

Top Five Contributors to the thread:

LTC8K6 106
The Big Dog 89
baron 87
William Parcher 57
theprestige 46
 
There has been no new evidence of any sort. Remember when you used to be a skeptic? There has been as much to support his story as there has been to falsify it. Specifically,.... zilch.

And since the closing line was apparently too subtle for you, perhaps others would like to take note of the usual suspects and the number of posts in the thread for each. THERE. IS. NO. NEW. REPORTING. You guys are just raking up the muck re-stating your very subjective opinions over and over.

Top Five Contributors to the thread:

LTC8K6 106
The Big Dog 89
baron 87
William Parcher 57
theprestige 46

Oh dear, argument ad countingposts, name calling "rEmEbEr wHeN yOu UsEd tO bE a SkEpTiC??!@"

There is plenty of new reporting, literally no one is forcing you to post or read the thread, and tone policing is absolutely boring as hell.

Lessons to live by FMW!

/now we wait for the clever rejoinder...
 
That's what I thought too however now I'm not sure. As I said in my edit I've found conflicting reports of that.

If you believe this however, do you realize that the screen shot the police say they have could not have been obtained in Chicago because the phone would have been with his manager in California?



How do you know he didn't?

I believe he didn't because he never said he did, despite the doubts about the phone call from the start.

Plus, I believe the police would be less insistent if they had already seen a record of the call. They would already know the official record exists, and so they could table that for now.

Besides, this discussion was really just about what Smollett might have done to comply. We do not know what he actually did, or didn't do, when the police arrived. We have a few tidbits in the media, and that's about it.
 
There has been no new evidence of any sort. Remember when you used to be a skeptic? There has been as much to support his story as there has been to falsify it. Specifically,.... zilch.

And since the closing line was apparently too subtle for you, perhaps others would like to take note of the usual suspects and the number of posts in the thread for each. THERE. IS. NO. NEW. REPORTING. You guys are just raking up the muck re-stating your very subjective opinions over and over.

Top Five Contributors to the thread:

LTC8K6 106
The Big Dog 89
baron 87
William Parcher 57
theprestige 46

The NY Post story about tracing the route and finding the bottle was new to me...

I think there hasn't been any new bigfoot or UFO evidence in decades...

This is common for lots of topics here, isn't it?
 
Oh dear, argument ad countingposts, name calling "rEmEbEr wHeN yOu UsEd tO bE a SkEpTiC??!@" There is plenty of new reporting, literally no one is forcing you to post or read the thread, and tone policing is absolutely boring as hell.

Lessons to live by FMW!

/now we wait for the clever rejoinder...

He sees it is indeed yinz' thing of late
 
There has been no new evidence of any sort. Remember when you used to be a skeptic? There has been as much to support his story as there has been to falsify it. Specifically,.... zilch.

There's been the fact that no cameras saw the alleged perpetrators.

It is conceivable that the attack would have occurred out of the sight of cameras, but how then would you explain the fact that 2 suspicious individuals were not seen entering or leaving the area where the attack occurred before or immediately after the attack, although Smollett was? The absence of evidence where evidence should exist if the story is true is a kind of evidence.
 
There's been the fact that no cameras saw the alleged perpetrators.

It is conceivable that the attack would have occurred out of the sight of cameras, but how then would you explain the fact that 2 suspicious individuals were not seen entering or leaving the area where the attack occurred before or immediately after the attack, although Smollett was? The absence of evidence where evidence should exist if the story is true is a kind of evidence.

Wasn't it determined that Smollett's entire walk had been recorded?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom