• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

The explosive racial question Osaka asked Japan

I think if you have meet people who think this, you should probably just google History of the relationship between Japan and China for them

Or Japan and Korea....

Fact is, Imperial Japan from about 1930 on was just as bigoted and it's German Buddies during the same period.
Koreans were treated as second class citizens, and Japan's actions in China at times approached Nazi Levels of Atrocity. See The Rape of Nanking for details.
 
Given that I have encountered people who hold that racism is an inherent trait linked to the 'white gene', I wonder how they can explain this since it involves a mixture of the 'peoples of color'.
Well, if such people exist I cannot speak for them because an opinion like that is not only stupid but an actual example of racism. Anyone who holds that sin is "inherent" in the genes of any "race" is a racist.


As far as Naomi Osaka goes, she's great and most Japanese people are very proud of her. Inevitably there are probably a few haters on the internet but that is only to be expected in any country. I believe they are a small minority.

The following morning after she won pretty much every TV channel was covering it. All the sports newspapers had her all over the front page. As one would expect.
 
OK, if you want to do it that way. You'll find that the least racist countries, as denoted by human rights metrics, tolerance and acceptance of different cultures, charitable giving, etc. are white majority. And I know, you're going to post something about Trump and his immigrant-hostile policies, but before you do I ask you to consider comparing the US with China, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Japan, Egypt, Chad, Iran, Mexico. the list goes on. The only real turds in the cream are Russia and South Africa.



I'm more concerned with behaviour as opposed to genetics, which is not a significant influence in this area.



Yes.



Yes.

If you’re going to make a claim about who is the least racist and most open-minded then there are other candidate variables aside from melanin content in the skin to explain the discrepancy between a very non-racist society such as ... the UK when compared with a very hateful and bigoted society such as ... I dunno, I was thinking Pakistan, but I have never been there...

For the most part, I think that certain pre-requisites such as wealth and democratic traditions and philosophical contemplation are more likely to produce non-racist societies. The latter require the former. The closer you are to a “state of nature” in terms of available resources, wealth creation, superstition, zero-sum division of resources etc... the more likely you are to engage in racism all else being equal.

They seem to be necessary conditions, but not sufficient. There are also contingent historical facts and traditions that can lead to more or less racism.
There’s also plenty of racism, by the way, in many parts of Eastern Europe - Hungary, Poland, Serbia (!), Croatia (!), Ukraine. And there are some pretty virulent strains of racism in France (Front Nationale anyone?) and Sweden (sterilization of impure ethnicities which ended like last Tuesday or something almost as eyebrow-raising!). Oh, and if we think of Germany as one of the bastions of enlightenment values and maybe the least anti-Semitic countries in the world (a big if), it isn’t without a few blemishes along the way - more likely a result of some blemishes, no?

Yeah, Japan has racism. Who doesn’t? But, Japan’s racism is more of the bewilderment at foreigners variety. The Japanese, bless them, don’t understand sophisticated speech codes around race or ethnicity. This kind of thing is not a part of the everyday curriculum, as far as I am aware. The Japanese don’t know it is racist to say that Japanese people ought to be able to speak Japanese (Naomi Osaka’s Japanese ability is lower than mine and that’s saying something!). They don’t know it is racist to depict foreign people with very large noses and blond wigs, or to complain about the smell of foreign food, or to say that foreigners are okay but they wouldn’t want one living next door because they don’t know how to put the rubbish out. They don’t know that it is racist to whitewash their own manga, and many were surprised to hear it was racist for Scarlett Johansson to play the lead in Ghost in the Shell or that it was racist for a Japanese comedian to portray Eddie Murphy in Beverley Hills Cop by blacking up (I am sure they were wondering, “but how else am I going to pull off this impression?”).

I can imagine that the brouhaha about the depiction of Naomi Osaka came from the feeling on the part of the cartoonist that if he portrays her as too dark it will be considered racist, so he portrayed her as too white so, the cartoonist is racist.

Okay, glad you thought it through! I don't share your view but I am particularly proud of my modesty instead!

Your modesty probably stems from you being of the best race - the least racist race!
 
I can imagine that the brouhaha about the depiction of Naomi Osaka came from the feeling on the part of the cartoonist that if he portrays her as too dark it will be considered racist, so he portrayed her as too white so, the cartoonist is racist.

This part is odd.

I get the impression that cartoonists "whitewash" her all the time.

She has a really nice blonde ponytail, I'm assuming that's by design, rather than by accident, and this probably makes things more confusing for the cartoonists.
 
tumblr_my7adbYIfV1rasnq9o1_r1_500.jpg


This, and only this, determines race. There is no white gene, although I'm starting to wonder about a stupid gene. Many genes contribute to skin color. Your socially learned ideas about people who look a little different is not attached to any of them. I can honestly say this is pretty high on the list of most ridiculous things I've ever heard.
 
Last edited:
This part is odd.

I get the impression that cartoonists "whitewash" her all the time.

She has a really nice blonde ponytail, I'm assuming that's by design, rather than by accident, and this probably makes things more confusing for the cartoonists.

I think this is the commercial that apparently caused "outcry" because Naomi Osaka was portrayed as caucasian. It doesn't seem to matter that everyone else in the ad, including Kei Nishikori, is also portrayed that way. Or maybe it does matter and aggravates the problem.

Who knows?

 
Japan has racism. Who doesn’t? But, Japan’s racism is more of the bewilderment at foreigners variety. The Japanese, bless them, don’t understand sophisticated speech codes around race or ethnicity. This kind of thing is not a part of the everyday curriculum, as far as I am aware. The Japanese don’t know it is racist to say that Japanese people ought to be able to speak Japanese (Naomi Osaka’s Japanese ability is lower than mine and that’s saying something!). They don’t know it is racist to depict foreign people with very large noses and blond wigs, or to complain about the smell of foreign food, or to say that foreigners are okay but they wouldn’t want one living next door because they don’t know how to put the rubbish out. They don’t know that it is racist to whitewash their own manga, and many were surprised to hear it was racist for Scarlett Johansson to play the lead in Ghost in the Shell or that it was racist for a Japanese comedian to portray Eddie Murphy in Beverley Hills Cop by blacking up (I am sure they were wondering, “but how else am I going to pull off this impression?”).

I can imagine that the brouhaha about the depiction of Naomi Osaka came from the feeling on the part of the cartoonist that if he portrays her as too dark it will be considered racist, so he portrayed her as too white so, the cartoonist is racist.


Yup. Seen this sort of thing.
 
I can imagine that the brouhaha about the depiction of Naomi Osaka came from the feeling on the part of the cartoonist that if he portrays her as too dark it will be considered racist, so he portrayed her as too white so, the cartoonist is racist.

I imagine that's probably right, but I can't read minds. But maybe he thought it would be safer to minimize her ethnic features rather than emphasize them. Also, a lot of people seem to think that characters drawn in manga/anime style look "caucasian" or "white" when in reality that's arguably just a characteristic of the style. I mean, Naruto has blond hair and blue eyes. That's one data point, but lots of anime characters (mostly they are either "Japanese" or live in some sort of fantasy world, but tend to have Japanese names) don't really look very Japanese.

I guess the point is that traditionally manga/anime illustrators haven't been particularly concerned with making their characters look "racially correct".
 
Only the far left believe that whites and whites alone are racist.

The unfortunate thing is that you very likely believe this pile of stinking excrement you just posted...

White people are, IMO, the least racist group on the planet, by a considerable margin.

...and this pile.

Let me give you some clues

330px-Children_with_Dr._Samuel_Green%2C_Ku_Klux_Klan_Grand_Dragon%2C_July_24%2C_1948.jpg
330px-Ku_Klux_Klan_members_march_down_Pennsylvania_Avenue_in_Washington%2C_D.C._in_1928.jpg
330px-Ku_Klux_Klan_members_and_a_burning_cross%2C_Denver%2C_Colorado%2C_1921.jpg


And if you think they are in decline, think again. They might not have the membership numbers of their heyday, but their numbers are on the rise.
 
If you’re going to make a claim about who is the least racist and most open-minded then there are other candidate variables aside from melanin content in the skin to explain the discrepancy between a very non-racist society such as ... the UK when compared with a very hateful and bigoted society such as ... I dunno, I was thinking Pakistan, but I have never been there...

It isn't me who's making the distinction. The lines are already drawn between white and non-whites, I'm making the point that contrary to leftist opinion, the former are, on average, the least racist group.

For the most part, I think that certain pre-requisites such as wealth and democratic traditions and philosophical contemplation are more likely to produce non-racist societies. The latter require the former. The closer you are to a “state of nature” in terms of available resources, wealth creation, superstition, zero-sum division of resources etc... the more likely you are to engage in racism all else being equal.

Possibly, I'm not making a claim to how these attitudes came about, I'm simply making a comment about the pre-defined groups.

They seem to be necessary conditions, but not sufficient. There are also contingent historical facts and traditions that can lead to more or less racism.
There’s also plenty of racism, by the way, in many parts of Eastern Europe - Hungary, Poland, Serbia (!), Croatia (!), Ukraine. And there are some pretty virulent strains of racism in France (Front Nationale anyone?) and Sweden (sterilization of impure ethnicities which ended like last Tuesday or something almost as eyebrow-raising!). Oh, and if we think of Germany as one of the bastions of enlightenment values and maybe the least anti-Semitic countries in the world (a big if), it isn’t without a few blemishes along the way - more likely a result of some blemishes, no?

Of course, specific examples, and historic ones, buck the trend. I'm just talking generically. We are forever told by the left that white people are the most racist, the most bigoted, the least tolerant, when the opposite is the case.

Yeah, Japan has racism. Who doesn’t? But, Japan’s racism is more of the bewilderment at foreigners variety. The Japanese, bless them, don’t understand sophisticated speech codes around race or ethnicity. This kind of thing is not a part of the everyday curriculum, as far as I am aware. The Japanese don’t know it is racist to say that Japanese people ought to be able to speak Japanese (Naomi Osaka’s Japanese ability is lower than mine and that’s saying something!). They don’t know it is racist to depict foreign people with very large noses and blond wigs, or to complain about the smell of foreign food, or to say that foreigners are okay but they wouldn’t want one living next door because they don’t know how to put the rubbish out. They don’t know that it is racist to whitewash their own manga, and many were surprised to hear it was racist for Scarlett Johansson to play the lead in Ghost in the Shell or that it was racist for a Japanese comedian to portray Eddie Murphy in Beverley Hills Cop by blacking up (I am sure they were wondering, “but how else am I going to pull off this impression?”).

I don't see any of those things as racist, I'm referring more to the idea that it's very difficult for a non-Japanese to be fully accepted into Japanese society. I must add at this point that I've never been there, so your experience obviously trumps mine, but this is what I've read and heard direct a couple of people who have worked and lived there. (I have worked for Tokyo companies for about six years now but that's remotely so I can't pretend to have gained much insight from that, aside from their efficiency and extreme politeness). Perhaps more pertinently, I'm talking about the attitude to different cultures and behaviours, and that's why I mentioned Japan. Correct me if I'm wrong, but the impression I get is that it's difficult or impossible to ever be completely accepted as a foreigner even if you embrace every aspect of Japanese society, language and culture. If you rock up and behave the same as you did in your own country you will be quickly excluded and isolated (even if you're not told as much to your face). This is not a criticism, however, rather a comparison of Japan with European countries.
 
Last edited:
Let me give you some clues

[qimg]https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/aa/Children_with_Dr._Samuel_Green%2C_Ku_Klux_Klan_Grand_Dragon%2C_July_24%2C_1948.jpg/330px-Children_with_Dr._Samuel_Green%2C_Ku_Klux_Klan_Grand_Dragon%2C_July_24%2C_1948.jpg[/qimg][qimg]https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/d7/Ku_Klux_Klan_members_march_down_Pennsylvania_Avenue_in_Washington%2C_D.C._in_1928.jpg/330px-Ku_Klux_Klan_members_march_down_Pennsylvania_Avenue_in_Washington%2C_D.C._in_1928.jpg[/qimg][qimg]https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/9f/Ku_Klux_Klan_members_and_a_burning_cross%2C_Denver%2C_Colorado%2C_1921.jpg/330px-Ku_Klux_Klan_members_and_a_burning_cross%2C_Denver%2C_Colorado%2C_1921.jpg[/qimg]

And if you think they are in decline, think again. They might not have the membership numbers of their heyday, but their numbers are on the rise.

Tragic.
 
I'm referring more to the idea that it's very difficult for a non-Japanese to be fully accepted into Japanese society.

That's rubbish.

Our rugby players do it frequently, so much so, that they forego playing for NZ teams and become Japanese Citizens, and end up playing for The Brave Blossoms (The Japanese National Rugby team).
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom