Status
Not open for further replies.
Trump seems to be tweeting back to reports on Fox News. So not only is he listening to the TV, he is talking back to it and expecting it to hear him. If anyone else's grandpa did that in his tatty old lounge chair, that's reasonably clear signs of dementia onset.


Except that in his case it's true.

Faux News uses almost every one of his tweets as another takeoff point to spread the lies, disinformation, and confusion they market to his base.
 
If only this story was presented with evidence to justify accepting the claim as true.

I have had a problem all day with the story being reported (on CNN, anyway), always with the caveat that is has not been independently corroborated. It's too big a story to depend on hearsay. The Special Counsel's Office just issued a statement saying that the characterization of that report is not accurate. I wonder how the evening yak shows are going to handle it?
 
https://twitter.com/DavidAFrench/status/1086365781942849537

Quick thread.

It's interesting to re-read Cohen's sentencing statement and brief in light of the BuzzFeed report. There's this excerpt from Cohen's brief, which seems to flatly declare that the false statements to Congress were "in accordance with Client 1's directives." /1

The thread continues, with a few relevant quotes embedded in the tweets.
 
Trump Tweets

Kevin Corke,
@FoxNews
“Don’t forget, Michael Cohen has already been convicted of perjury and fraud, and as recently as this week, the Wall Street Journal has suggested that he may have stolen tens of thousands of dollars....” Lying to reduce his jail time! Watch father-in-law!
I can't fathom what Trump is trying to achieve by threatening Cohen's father-in-law. Cohen's not going to retract. If Trump just wants to retaliate against Cohen be revealing something about his father-in-law he'd have done so already. He's clearly threatening a witness, but apparently with a bluff. Or has he seen something on InfoWars? I suppose we'll have to watch to find out.
 
From Mueller spokesman (per CNN):

BuzzFeed's description of specific statements to the Special Councel's Office, and characterization of documents and testimony obtained by this office, regarding Michael Cohen's Congressional testimony are not accurate.
- Peter Carr​
 
From Mueller spokesman (per CNN):

BuzzFeed's description of specific statements to the Special Councel's Office, and characterization of documents and testimony obtained by this office, regarding Michael Cohen's Congressional testimony are not accurate.
- Peter Carr​

They say this. The White House says the whole thing is "categorically false".

Ah hell... I can't even be sure of the spelling of "counsel" any more.
 
From Mueller spokesman (per CNN):

BuzzFeed's description of specific statements to the Special Councel's Office, and characterization of documents and testimony obtained by this office, regarding Michael Cohen's Congressional testimony are not accurate.
- Peter Carr​

Fair enough. Demonstrates that Mueller’s investigation is honest.
 
From Mueller spokesman (per CNN):

BuzzFeed's description of specific statements to the Special Councel's Office, and characterization of documents and testimony obtained by this office, regarding Michael Cohen's Congressional testimony are not accurate.
- Peter Carr​

The best part of this response is that it answers so many questions and isn't cryptic at all.
 
And from buzzfeed:

In response to the statement tonight from the Special Counsel's spokesman: We stand by our reporting and the sources who informed it, and we urge the Special Counsel to make clear what he's disputing.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom