• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Mueller Investigation pt4

Status
Not open for further replies.
Delphic Oracle said:
There's a Simpson's episode where Chief Wiggum comes around to grill the mob guys about a hijacked truck of cigarettes. The mob boss goes "what's a truck?"

That's about the level of willfull ignorance on display when supposedly intelligent people spend half the discussion acting like their IQ is lower than their age.
Click to expand...

Amen, I mean who hasn't heard of the meme that on the internet no one knows you are a dog?
 
The important thing is that the conversation get redirected to the manner in which this expert's opinion is presented and not the opinion itself, which is that Trump is outright breaking the law here and he'd already be in jail if he weren't the president.
 
Beelzebuddy said:
The important thing is that the conversation get redirected to the manner in which this expert's opinion is presented and not the opinion itself, which is that Trump is outright breaking the law here and he'd already be in jail if he weren't the president.
Click to expand...

which "expert" are you talking about??
 
plague311 said:
At this point it would be easier to find "experts" who don't hold that position.
Click to expand...

A few years back in order to point of the absurdity of acting as if creationist finding a handful of scientist who agree with them meant it anything Project Steve was started that showed that more just scientist named Steve supported evolution than scientist period rejected it.

You could probably do a Project Steve on legal experts just named Steven who thing Trump has done something (notworthably) illegal versus all legal experts who don't.
 
Last edited:
JoeMorgue said:
A few years back in order to point of the absurdity of acting as if creationist finding a handful of scientist who agree with them meant it anything Project Steve was started that showed that more just scientist named Steve supported evolution than scientist period rejected it.

You could probably do a Project Steve on legal experts just named Steven who thing Trump has done something (notworthably) illegal versus all legal experts who don't.
Click to expand...

No, it would need to be project Donald, I think.

Just for the funny :D
 
Squeegee Beckenheim said:
Not that this is relevant to the post you've quoted, but it hasn't been released yet.
Click to expand...

well, it is really hard to guess what one should find relevant given that it is just a substance free link to a twitter thread about a report that HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED yet and what it means or may not mean, :rolleyes:
 
It is all just an interpretive dream unfolding before us. Nothing really means anything. No informed speculation exists or can exist, all exercises such are but folly...
 
As for actual facts, recall that in April the Committee on Intelligence released a report stating that "Among the 44 findings in the report was a line stating that 'Federal Bureau of Investigation agents did not detect any deception during Flynn's interview.'”

As such, when considering the release of the Flynn sentencing report today, ask yourself about this finding by the House.

Keep in mind also when considering the Report that there is evidence that actual scumbos McCabe and Strzok falsified the 304s for the Flynn interview.

Flynn pardon is very cool and very legal.
 
Last edited:
The Big Dog said:
As for actual facts, recall that in April the Committee on Intelligence released a report stating that "Among the 44 findings in the report was a line stating that 'Federal Bureau of Investigation agents did not detect any deception during Flynn's interview.'”

As such, when considering the release of the Flynn sentencing report today, ask yourself about this finding by the House.

Keep in mind also when considering the Report that there is evidence that actual scumbos McCabe and Strzok falsified the 304s for the Flynn interview.

Flynn pardon is very cool and very legal.
Click to expand...

LoL shocking that you support a pardon.

Also, no one should believe anything from the House. Everything they did was either half-assed or lied about by Nunez. It should all be dismissed until it can be done again with legitimacy. Even invoking it as part of an argument is evidence that you have absolutely nothing to support an already dying narrative that anyone charged by Mueller didn't deserve what they have coming to them.
 
The Big Dog said:
As for actual facts, recall that in April the Committee on Intelligence...
Click to expand...
You mean the committee that is both headed by a republican, and which contains a majority of republicans, who just happen to be members of the same party as Trump.

That's a good start...

...released a report stating that "Among the 44 findings in the report was a line stating that 'Federal Bureau of Investigation agents did not detect any deception during Flynn's interview.'”
Click to expand...
Uhhh... so?

Most obvious response to this is that Flynn was just good at lying. That doesn't necessarily mean that 1) he was actually telling the truth, and 2) that there isn't evidence that he was lying outside of things like body language.

From: https://thehill.com/policy/national...omey-mccabe-testified-that-the-two-agents-who
The report notes that Comey testified that “the agents … discerned no physical indications of deception. They didn’t see any change in posture, in tone, in inflection, in eye contact. They saw nothing that indicated to them that he knew he was lying to them.” McCabe also then confirmed this to the Intelligence Committee, according to the report, but added that they’d found Flynn’s statements were “inconsistent” with what they had understood to be his conversations with Kislyak.
 
I Am The Scum said:
Soft on crime
Click to expand...

according the FBI agent who actually interviewed him, there was no crime.

Until McCabe and that other jackal got involved and doctored the 304's.

Justice for Flynn!

/ And given that the estimated sentencing range is zero to six months, I trust that our hero Mueller is not going to make this a total dog and pony show.
 
Last edited:
The Big Dog said:
according the FBI agent who actually interviewed him, there was no crime.
Until McCabe and that other jackal got involved and doctored the 304's.

Justice for Flynn!
Click to expand...

Wow, time till first lie...first sentence. That's not what the FBI agent said at all unless you cherry pick, which you've proven to do. They never said Flynn committed no crime. In fact, Flynn didn't even say Flynn didn't commit a crime LoL.
 
Last edited:
The Big Dog said:
according the FBI agent who actually interviewed him, there was no crime.
Click to expand...
Wrong.

The agents who interviewed him didn't say there was no crime. They said they saw no physical signs he was lying (e.g. eye contact, posture, vocal tone). That doesn't necessarily mean "no crime". It could also mean "He is very good at lying".

The FBI agents that had interviewed Flynn were not commenting on other evidence that had been gathered, only on Flynn's body language.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom