Status
Not open for further replies.
I'd get fired, if I checked the Native American box on an application for the Minority Faculty Directory.

And if you could prove that you actually had Native American heritage like Warren has, you’d probably have yourself a wrongful termination lawsuit.
 
But she never claimed to be NA! (insert shrieking here)

At worse she did something ill-advised for, as far as anyone can tell, entirely innocent motivations. <insert shrieking> but the left did something that can kinda sorta be seen as racial insensitive! See they're the real racists. <end shrieking>
 
Except nobody had challenged Dukakis to ride in a tank and said he wasn't qualified to be President if he didn't.

Or offered to donate a million dollars to charity if he did so, and then weaseled out of that obligation.
 
Thayd put the ancestor around the founding or civil war. Either one would only have been a couple of generations from living memory. My tells me stories about my great, great, great grandfather passed down from my grandfather. Not really a stretch.

That would be pretty civil war (born 1830) at exactly six generations back.

But you are making a probability error. The report said 6-10 generations, and you are emphasizing only one of the five possible generations. We don't know how probable each one is. It is probably a fair guess that 7-10 generations is more likely than 6.
 
I think Warren made a very minor mistake in presenting her DNA. It doesn't change a damn thing. The people who would vote for or against her were never going to base their decision on this. I think it's a mistake to respond to non-issues. The good news for Warren though, is it still doesn't make a difference.
 
It's like Obama releasing his long form birth certificate. It closes out the argument for reasonable people. Leaving only the nut case conspiracy theorists still arguing about it.

It is unfortunate that the category of nut case conspiracy theorist includes our current President. :rolleyes:


We're already seeing Trump claiming that the DNA test was fraudulent. The more things change, the more they stay the same.
 
Cherokee Official Says Trump- Warren DNA Debate Not Helping Tribe

NPR: https://www.npr.org/2018/10/16/657778814/cherokee-official-says-trump-warren-dna-debate-not-helping-tribe?utm_source=facebook.com&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=npr&utm_term=nprnews&utm_content=2044

The DNA test that Sen. Elizabeth Warren took, which showed she has Native American ancestry, is "completely irrelevant to the process" of determining her tribal identity, the Cherokee Secretary of State told NPR's Morning Edition.

Chuck Hoskin was also critical of President Trump, saying he "should not be calling her 'Pocahontas,' but "should be looking into the needs of Indian country are because the needs are there."
 

Wait, Warren wanted to meet people she had something in common with, maybe even attend a luncheon? The horror!

Perhaps you are unaware of this, but people often identify with others they share things in common with. It's quite common for people with Scottish ancestors to join The Saint Andrews Society, or a Clan Society if they have the right surname. That doesn't mean they are claiming Scottish citizenship.
 
Wait, Warren wanted to meet people she had something in common with, maybe even attend a luncheon? The horror!

Perhaps you are unaware of this, but people often identify with others they share things in common with. It's quite common for people with Scottish ancestors to join The Saint Andrews Society, or a Clan Society if they have the right surname. That doesn't mean they are claiming Scottish citizenship.


Changing their ethnicity on their employers records might mean something as far as what they are claiming to be? (or no?)
 
Wait, Warren wanted to meet people she had something in common with, maybe even attend a luncheon? The horror!

Perhaps you are unaware of this, but people often identify with others they share things in common with. It's quite common for people with Scottish ancestors to join The Saint Andrews Society, or a Clan Society if they have the right surname. That doesn't mean they are claiming Scottish citizenship.

I would think having your name in a minority directory of law professors, might be something that would assist in networking.

Schools looking for minority hires, that would be the first place they would look.
 
Changing their ethnicity on their employers records might mean something as far as what they are claiming to be? (or no?)

I haven't seen any evidence that she changed evidence in her employers records. I saw your unattributed picture, but as your sources so far have been attrocious I see no reason to believe one that you won't even cite.
 
I would think having your name in a minority directory of law professors, might be something that would assist in networking.

Schools looking for minority hires, that would be the first place they would look.

If that were the case, it doesn't make sense that she changed the listing 3 years after being hired. Also, what minority directory are you talking about? Previous discussions have been about a listing in the regular directory, now you are bringing up a separate directory?
 
Most bizzare thread ever.

Warren claimed NA ancestry based on what her mother told her. DNA confirms somewhat distant NA ancestry.

/thread

Meanwhile, we have arguments about a 1984 cookbook from the side that shoots and kills protesters at their rallies.

Just bizzare.
 
Most bizzare thread ever.

Warren claimed NA ancestry based on what her mother told her. DNA confirms somewhat distant NA ancestry.

/thread

Meanwhile, we have arguments about a 1984 cookbook from the side that shoots and kills protesters at their rallies.

Just bizzare.

Thread could be called "Elizabeth Warren falsifies minority status Thread"

Because we can all agree that that was improper.
 
Thread could be called "Elizabeth Warren falsifies minority status Thread"

Because we can all agree that that was improper.

Agreed, she's mostly cracker and claiming minority status for NA ancestry is improper. Moving on, what do we have? A bet with the President that he has yet again shown what his word is worth.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom