baron
Unregistered
- Joined
- Dec 8, 2006
- Messages
- 8,627
It goes deeper than football, Rangers and Celtic are just convenient pegs.
I understand that, I'm trying to pin down the nature of this 'religious dress'.
It goes deeper than football, Rangers and Celtic are just convenient pegs.
The degree to which Baylor has ignored the various iterations of that question speaks volumes.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...s-secretive-sharia-courts-special-report.html"Such is the protective veil surrounding these religious tribunals (or councils, as Islamic jurists prefer to call them) that, as a recent Home Office review conceded, not even the Government knows how many operate in this country.
What we do know is that sharia courts are proliferating across Britain and are held in many towns and cities with sizeable Muslim communities.
As the Government review states, critics regard them as anathema to British values because they ‘keep many Muslims isolated, entrenched and with little social stake in wider British citizenship and life’."
The Protestant/Catholic divide as best exampled by football and Rangers vs Celtic, is pretty well known. Religious bigotry has and is a big issue for many.
The posters in the campaign do not say what you suggest they are saying. There is no reference to any religion. The big problem inScotlandGlasgow is, as I said, Protestant vs Catholic.
Has a Muslim ever been successfully prosecuted for Hate Speech in Scotland?
As I mentioned upthread, that is ancient history and it was before the fearless, childless leaders of Europe put their multicultural utopia plan into overdrive. The guy was an EDL member so he was a Muslim Uncle Tom.
Why do you wish to do away with a literally centuries old right?The Home Office answered that question for me. A substantial but unknown number of communities has been conceded to Muslim parallel societies and aren't beholden to UK law.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...s-secretive-sharia-courts-special-report.html
As for the "getting people on the Internet to prove something" challenge...well, the top comment from that article--with 1056 upvotes and only 27 downvotes--corroborates everything I've been saying thus far.
"At first one would say 'beyond belief' but if you have lived in this country over the years then you would not in anyway be surprised! A country within a country."
The Home Office answered that question for me. A substantial but unknown number of communities has been conceded to Muslim parallel societies and aren't beholden to UK law.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...s-secretive-sharia-courts-special-report.html
As for the "getting people on the Internet to prove something" challenge...well, the top comment from that article--with 1056 upvotes and only 27 downvotes--corroborates everything I've been saying thus far.
"At first one would say 'beyond belief' but if you have lived in this country over the years then you would not in anyway be surprised! A country within a country."
The Home Office answered that question for me. A substantial but unknown number of communities has been conceded to Muslim parallel societies and aren't beholden to UK law.........
Why do you wish to do away with a literally centuries old right?
[T]he lack of protection for these women under the country’s law that has led to sharia councils springing up in the UK. According to the thinktank Civitas, there are about 85 in existence. Some are informal gatherings of “authoritative figures”; others are formal setups attached to mosques....
It’s not often we can say that British Muslim women’s rights should match those of the women in Muslim countries.
You are conflating two separate things: Sharia "law" (it isn't), and no-go areas. There are no such thing as the latter, and the former is one of the many different forms of conciliation process that is acceptable before cases go to court. It isn't applicable to criminal activity, but is a voluntary arrangement in cases of civil disagreement.
Because I believe in women's rights, gay rights, animal rights, victim's rights, etc. I have the conviction to stand up for these rights. I'm sorry you don't.
...snip...
It's certainly voluntary for the man. For the woman, less so.
Shariah courts are mutually-agreed civil tribunals that cannot over-ride British law. I'm not sure how many more times you need to be told that.The Home Office answered that question for me. A substantial but unknown number of communities has been conceded to Muslim parallel societies and aren't beholden to UK law.
As I mentioned upthread, that is ancient history and it was before the fearless, childless leaders of Europe put their multicultural utopia plan into overdrive.
Shariah courts are mutually-agreed civil tribunals that cannot over-ride British law. I'm not sure how many more times you need to be told that.
Because I believe in women's rights, gay rights, animal rights, victim's rights, etc. I have the conviction to stand up for these rights. I'm sorry you don't.
https://www.independent.co.uk/voice...untries-religious-rulings-quran-a8064796.html
Built into that statement is an assumption that someone is interested in facts.
I love the feeling of a brick wall against my forehead in the morning....
Are they also targeted against mosques? Nah, we both know that answer to that.
And is it right for the police to be supporting literature that 'has a dig' (i.e. provokes, inflames, mocks) any portion of society?