• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Cont: Proof of Immortality VIII

- Just to let you all know, Sackett sent me a PM at 8:49 AM, 5/29, agreeing to hear my responses to Jay's "fatal flaws." I responded a little later, asking for how he wanted me to proceed. At 9:32 the same morning, he responded, telling me that I should not proceed just yet.
- By the morning of 5/31, Sackett hadn't told me to proceed, so I assumed that he had changed his mind, and told him my assumption. At 10:44 AM on 5/31, he told me that he hadn't changed his mind, and that I shouldn't assume anything. I said OK.
- So far, that's where we stand...
 
Take note that Jabba has been following my instructions: to do nothing until he hears from me.
 
Last edited:
Jabba said:
- Just to let you all know, Sackett sent me a PM at 8:49 AM, 5/29, agreeing to hear my responses to Jay's "fatal flaws." I responded a little later, asking for how he wanted me to proceed. At 9:32 the same morning, he responded, telling me that I should not proceed just yet.
- By the morning of 5/31, Sackett hadn't told me to proceed, so I assumed that he had changed his mind, and told him my assumption. At 10:44 AM on 5/31, he told me that he hadn't changed his mind, and that I shouldn't assume anything. I said OK.
- So far, that's where we stand...
Click to expand...
You always manage to find supporting citations that don't actually support your argument. Now you've managed to find someone who wants to hear your argument your way... and they don't actually want to hear your argument. How long have you been studying this degree of failure? Fifty years?
 
Jabba said:
- Just to let you all know, Sackett sent me a PM at 8:49 AM, 5/29, agreeing to hear my responses to Jay's "fatal flaws." I responded a little later, asking for how he wanted me to proceed.
Click to expand...


Let’s get this straight: sackett agreed to let you address JayUtah’s list of flaws “your way”, and your response was to ask sackett what “your way” is?
 
So wait at this point we're having Jabba update us on a private conversation he's having with another person?
 
Jabba said:
- Just to let you all know, Sackett sent me a PM at 8:49 AM, 5/29, agreeing to hear my responses to Jay's "fatal flaws." I responded a little later, asking for how he wanted me to proceed. At 9:32 the same morning, he responded, telling me that I should not proceed just yet.
- By the morning of 5/31, Sackett hadn't told me to proceed, so I assumed that he had changed his mind, and told him my assumption. At 10:44 AM on 5/31, he told me that he hadn't changed his mind, and that I shouldn't assume anything. I said OK.
- So far, that's where we stand...
Click to expand...

This has nothing to do with this thread
 
Jabba said:
- Just to let you all know, Sackett sent me a PM at 8:49 AM, 5/29, agreeing to hear my responses to Jay's "fatal flaws." I responded a little later, asking for how he wanted me to proceed. At 9:32 the same morning, he responded, telling me that I should not proceed just yet.
- By the morning of 5/31, Sackett hadn't told me to proceed, so I assumed that he had changed his mind, and told him my assumption. At 10:44 AM on 5/31, he told me that he hadn't changed his mind, and that I shouldn't assume anything. I said OK.
- So far, that's where we stand...
Click to expand...
So if he continues to not tell you to proceed, you will just keep silent?

I .... LIKE IT!
 
Jabba said:
- Just to let you all know, Sackett sent me a PM at 8:49 AM, 5/29, agreeing to hear my responses to Jay's "fatal flaws."
Click to expand...

Why should any of us care about that? You've sat on my challenge for a whole damn year, variously ignoring it or trying to warp it into something that serves your selfish purposes. If you're not meeting the challenge the way I formulated it, you're not meeting my challenge. Quit trying to cobble up something else and pretend it satisfies my challenge. It's disrespectful and rude.

So far, that's where we stand...
Click to expand...

Where we stand is that you haven't yet figured out that Sackett is taking you for a ride, the same way he took you for a ride a year ago when he volunteered to be the designated opponent for your "map." Where we stand is that I've waited patiently for a year for you to man up and finally face the flaws in your reasoning, and you're scrambling, grasping at straws to do anything except that.

Pathetic, Jabba. Utterly pathetic.
 
I'm sure that Jabba, using his superior holistic thinking and employing the 2-3 hours he devotes daily to this forum, will eventually be able to figure out Sackett's effective debate methodology.
 
It's gotta be intentional: Engage with Jay, who will hold his feet to the fire... Or engage with Sackett, who will faff about a bit and then leave him alone?

Doesn't take 3 hours to figure out that one.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom