• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Lol

The democrat report won’t say there was collusion either. They just need more time!

Meh, the Democrat report has been blocked and hindered every step of the way. I don't really care what it says, either.

It's the results of Mueller's investigation that will tell us what's what.
 
Two should probably have a bit explicitly said in it, given that they've long since walked that specific claim back to "We didn't find anything because we weren't looking for or at that" and the like.

Good point. I'd forgotten that the House Republicans had said that the report wasn't looking in to that. So that they didn't find it really shouldn't come as a surprise to anybody.
 
Good point. I'd forgotten that the House Republicans had said that the report wasn't looking in to that. So that they didn't find it really shouldn't come as a surprise to anybody.

Yeah... with the Fusion GPS and Sessions sessions as really obvious examples, the bulk of the Republicans pretty clearly were "investigating" to try to find ways to squirm out of the nasty position that they put themselves in and had no actual interest in trying to find or deal with any wrongdoing that could reflect negatively on their party, and by extension, the President that they got into office.
 
Last edited:
99074f54e3b17f64e.gif
 
I don't consider kabuki theater, performed by the most shameless sycophants known to man, as a valid data source. And nor should you.

You must mean the loser democrats. Keep the investigation going until they feel they’re satisfied. :rolleyes:
 
Like Bengahzi, e-mails, and voting to repeal the ACA?

Ehh, no need to invoke anything close to "equivalence," even by simple association. You're just feeding that false narrative that too many Republicans have been making and using to hand wave away the problems of their party rather than making any notable effort to actually deal with them. They're rather consistently trying to convince themselves that the absurd partisanship of the current Republican party is just the way the world/politics as a whole really works.

Either way, when an "investigation" into something doesn't even touch a whole lot of the important, available, publicly known, and seemingly very relevant leads, that's a very clear indication that it's not even remotely serious, before even getting to the rest of the serious problems in play in this case. When even the basic functional requirements to qualify due diligence as being met, the people saying that it's not complete have a very strong case to make, regardless of the empty aspersions that those like logger may forward to try to make themselves feel better about the problems that they're trying to sweep under the rug.
 
Last edited:
Ehh, no need to invoke anything close to "equivalence," even by simple association. You're just feeding that false narrative that too many Republicans have been making and using to hand wave away the problems of their party rather than making any notable effort to actually deal with them. They're rather consistently trying to convince themselves that the absurd partisanship of the current Republican party is just the way the world/politics as a whole really works.

Either way, when an "investigation" into something doesn't even touch a whole lot of the important, available, publicly known, and seemingly very relevant leads, that's a very clear indication that it's not even remotely serious, before even getting to the rest of the serious problems in play in this case. When even the basic functional requirements to qualify due diligence as being met, the people saying that it's not complete have a very strong case to make, regardless of the empty aspersions that those like logger may forward to try to make themselves feel better about the problems that they're trying to sweep under the rug.
I don’t think you are understanding the coverup going on. The whole top leadership of the FBI is gone. And many of them seem to be under investigation. It isn’t serious to suggest the investigation wasn’t complete. What you’re saying is if they keep looking they may find a speeding ticket or even a fraudulent tax return or bad business deal, but they sure as hell aren’t finding Trump/Russian Collusion.
 
I don’t think you are understanding the coverup going on. The whole top leadership of the FBI is gone. And many of them seem to be under investigation. It isn’t serious to suggest the investigation wasn’t complete. What you’re saying is if they keep looking they may find a speeding ticket or even a fraudulent tax return or bad business deal, but they sure as hell aren’t finding Trump/Russian Collusion.

LOL, on the contrary, there's considerable circumstantial evidence of a conspiracy already in the public domain, and we don't know yet what information Mueller got from Flynn and Papadopoulos in exchange for light charges. It's looking virtually certain that there will be conspiracy indictments, and I seriously doubt that even you will really be surprised.
 
LOL, on the contrary, there's considerable circumstantial evidence of a conspiracy already in the public domain, and we don't know yet what information Mueller got from Flynn and Papadopoulos in exchange for light charges. It's looking virtually certain that there will be conspiracy indictments, and I seriously doubt that even you will really be surprised.

The FBI says Flynn didn’t lie. That he plead guilty for reasons that are a mystery. So I’m not sure why you would say virtually certain? That is certainly something to laugh out loud about.
 
The FBI says Flynn didn’t lie. That he plead guilty for reasons that are a mystery. So I’m not sure why you would say virtually certain? That is certainly something to laugh out loud about.

LOL, we now know that Comey told congress in his March 2017 secret testimony that FBI agents didn't think Flynn lied in his January 24th interview. Nine months later, Mueller indicted him for lying in that interview. Did it occur to you that the "reasons that are a mystery" might include turning up evidence that he had indeed lied? Regardless of what he said to the FBI, we know that he publicly lied about talking to Kislyac. We also know that Mueller had him dead-to-rights on an unregistered foreign agent rap, but "for reasons that are a mystery" didn't charge him.

And then there's Papadopoulos, who knew about the hacked emails and the Russian desire to help Trump at least a month before it was pubic knowledge. Who else did he inform, and what came of it? Not informing the FBI opened him up to a charge of conspiracy, but "for reasons that are a mystery" Mueller only charged him with lying about his contacts.

Yes, it is virtually certain that the investigation will produce conspiracy indictments -- the only question is whose names will on them
 
LOL, we now know that Comey told congress in his March 2017 secret testimony that FBI agents didn't think Flynn lied in his January 24th interview. Nine months later, Mueller indicted him for lying in that interview. Did it occur to you that the "reasons that are a mystery" might include turning up evidence that he had indeed lied? Regardless of what he said to the FBI, we know that he publicly lied about talking to Kislyac. We also know that Mueller had him dead-to-rights on an unregistered foreign agent rap, but "for reasons that are a mystery" didn't charge him.

We also know that Mueller put off charging him. Two reasons for that, either he had more information to tell them or that the charge won’t stick.
And then there's Papadopoulos, who knew about the hacked emails and the Russian desire to help Trump at least a month before it was pubic knowledge. Who else did he inform, and what came of it? Not informing the FBI opened him up to a charge of conspiracy, but "for reasons that are a mystery" Mueller only charged him with lying about his contacts.

Not informing the FBI? Got it. That’s like a lifetime sentence. :rolleyes:
 
We also know that Mueller put off charging him. Two reasons for that, either he had more information to tell them or that the charge won’t stick.


Not informing the FBI? Got it. That’s like a lifetime sentence. :rolleyes:

Not informing the authorities about being approached by an agent of an unfriendly foreign power and subsequently meeting up with agents of that foreign power is serious.
 
Not informing the authorities about being approached by an agent of an unfriendly foreign power and subsequently meeting up with agents of that foreign power is serious.

Agents? Aren’t you assigning something to them Flynn may not have known. It’s common practice for an incoming administration to meet with leaders of foreign countries. It’s truly a dishonest strategy to somehow infer that it was illegal.
 
We also know that Mueller put off charging him. Two reasons for that, either he had more information to tell them or that the charge won’t stick.


Not informing the FBI? Got it. That’s like a lifetime sentence. :rolleyes:

LOL, it depends: When not informing the FBI about a lot of stuff gets added to a lot of other circumstantial evidence of conspiracy and knowledge of guilt, I'd be very worried if I were a Trumper. I don't suppose it would do any good, though, so I guess it is best that you're not. :p
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom