Basis of Immortality?

Yes, of course people talk about it. What utter and cluelessly abject fool would say otherwise? People talk about everything. They speak in the tongues of men and of angels, they lie, they utter deathless poems and nonsense doggerel, confusion and delusion and wisdom and science. Some talk intelligibly and some not. None of it is absolute and final. We talk and talk, and only the most foolish among us would demand that we limit that talk to the nonexistent and nonsensical standard of "A&F" and only the few even among those would maintain that their own utterances meet that nonexistent and nonsensical standard.
Yes, so non À&F of all should be digestable to all with equanimity. Say, I am not pérfect never can be so others are also entítled to non perfection. Do regard everyone as you dó to yourself.
 
When the time comes time to present evidence, I know where I can find people who are pathologically credulous and will claim or believe any fool thing.

What have you got?

Then, why such foolish things are disscussed here? Should not be allowed.
 
Oh Kumar babu, mahaguru! I am today seeing apples in store that is GREEN! Nor red, guru! What you are telling oranges are sweeat & apples are red?!?!?

I thinking you are bit odd telling disciples red when green.

I am seeing yellow apples too also in addition besides. What in damn hell going on, Mahalingam? World wonders.

Not whole lot, but bit maybe little. No hurry. Reply by normal post.
True. Nothing is A&F. Accept.
 
Yes, so non À&F of all should be digestable to all with equanimity. Say, I am not pérfect never can be so others are also entítled to non perfection. Do regard everyone as you dó to yourself.

Why do you say this? Has anybody here, besides yourself, ever demanded anybody to be A&F?

Hans
 
Why do you say this? Has anybody here, besides yourself, ever demanded anybody to be A&F?

Hans
Yes, they demand A&F type evidences from me. Whén given partly, they throw those in dustbin by this and that excuse...cherry pick, not absolute study, study by íntrested people, no stimuli presence, no dose effect relatión etc etc. All these suggest they ask for A&F evidence in their egoistic /irratiónal skepticism.
 
Yes, they demand A&F type evidences from me. Whén given partly, they throw those in dustbin by this and that excuse...cherry pick, not absolute study, study by íntrested people, no stimuli presence, no dose effect relatión etc etc. All these suggest they ask for A&F evidence in their egoistic /irratiónal skepticism.

Bóó-hóó.
 
Of course in education much varies, but I will tell you one thing I learned rather early in my college career long ago, in which such things were studied with some concentration. The idea that values are relative does not mean they do not exist. We measure a foot by an arbitrary standard which is not absolute, but only relative. And yet, we would be the utterest fools if we denied that a board eight feet long is not longer than one six feet long.

I also recall that in an earlier exchange you remarked that apples are not grown where you are, and confessed a great ignorance of apples when confronted with statements regarding them, and their status as a domesticated plant. It probably would be a good idea then not to make further statements about apples.
 
Of course in education much varies, but I will tell you one thing I learned rather early in my college career long ago, in which such things were studied with some concentration. The idea that values are relative does not mean they do not exist. We measure a foot by an arbitrary standard which is not absolute, but only relative. And yet, we would be the utterest fools if we denied that a board eight feet long is not longer than one six feet long.


And we would also be utter fools if, having measured the board at 8 feet plus or minus 1/8 of an inch, we then insisted that this uncertainty means that we cannot say that it is not six feet long, since the length of the board is not "A&F".
 
Last edited:
they are discussed and the lack of their foundation and lack of reality

Íf you want to emd anythíng, best thíng is you forget that or let it die in ítself, If you wíll go on díscussing ít, it will cóntinue ór cañ alsó grow móre. Cúrícity and confúsíóns are bíg catàlyst.
 

Back
Top Bottom