OMG, the spurious accents are catching!
OMG? Surprising? Yes on ultimate God is always remembered by every one.
OMG, the spurious accents are catching!
It's true that our language carries a lot of residual reference to God which even those who do not believe often use because common language makes for clear communication. Do not take it too seriously. Everyone says goodbye, even those who don't know what it means.OMG? Surprising? Yes on ultimate God is always remembered by every one.![]()
True. Nothing odd in remembering god. God ís not odd.It's true that our language carries a lot of residual reference to God which even those who do not believe often use because common language makes for clear communication. Do not take it too seriously. Everyone says goodbye, even those who don't know what it means.
You do of course utterly miss the point. When we say "goodbye" we are not, or at least not likely, remembering God at all. We are using a figure of speech which once referred to God. Half the days of the week refer to the pantheistic gods of the Norse, but nobody would suggest that making a date for next Thursday relates in any useful way to the existence of Thor.True. Nothing odd in remembering god. God ís not odd.
You do of course utterly miss the point. When we say "goodbye" we are not, or at least not likely, remembering God at all. We are using a figure of speech which once referred to God. Half the days of the week refer to the pantheistic gods of the Norse, but nobody would suggest that making a date for next Thursday relates in any useful way to the existence of Thor.
No, because "absolute" and "final" are not verbs.
What is the issue for understanding its sense i.e.:
Should we not be absolute & final?
No, because it isn't possible in the real world.
But you asked whether we should absolute and final, which is nonsense because absolute and final are adjectives.
Ok thans. I feel, we can use orange be sweat or apple be red ?
Irrelevant. And in any case, the idea that oranges are sweat is clearly nonsensical.
English is bit peculiar language.
I suggest that the only we we will be absolute and final is by dying, which is not recommended at all. Life, the universe, and the comprehensive knowledge of humanity, can not be absolute and final and also continue to grow, change, and exist.What is the issue for understanding its sense i.e.:
Should we not be absolute & final?
Here we expect, demand and express.
Sorry, sweet orange. English is bit peculiar language.
No. People do talk about soul, rebirth, afterlife etc.I suggest that the only we we will be absolute and final is by dying, which is not recommended at all. Life, the universe, and the comprehensive knowledge of humanity, can not be absolute and final and also continue to grow, change, and exist.
Yes, of course people talk about it. What utter and cluelessly abject fool would say otherwise? People talk about everything. They speak in the tongues of men and of angels, they lie, they utter deathless poems and nonsense doggerel, confusion and delusion and wisdom and science. Some talk intelligibly and some not. None of it is absolute and final. We talk and talk, and only the most foolish among us would demand that we limit that talk to the nonexistent and nonsensical standard of "A&F" and only the few even among those would maintain that their own utterances meet that nonexistent and nonsensical standard.No. People do talk about soul, rebirth, afterlife etc.![]()
No. People do talk about soul, rebirth, afterlife etc.![]()
No. People do talk about soul, rebirth, afterlife etc.![]()