• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Cont: Possible Scientific Foundations of Homeopathy, Part 2

This one?


Anyway, whether transformation of energy into different forms could yet be fully understood in science?

Whether atoms are just aggregation of energy or elementary particles?

Kumar, if you want a course in nuclear physics I suggest you enroll in some university.

Hans
 
Kumar, if you want a course in nuclear physics I suggest you enroll in some university.

Hans

How then we shall be able to discuss?

Is there any difference in effect giving property by a single wave and long wave consisting of many waves? How we see multiple waves in an image?
 
How then we shall be able to discuss?

Is there any difference in effect giving property by a single wave and long wave consisting of many waves? How we see multiple waves in an image?

Electromagnetics, now? And optics?

Kumar, you are the embodyment of the proverb "one fool can ask more questions than seven wise men can answer".

What is the purpose of these questions?

Why do you want to know about energy/matter conversion? - It has nothing to do with homeopathy.

Why do you want to know about primary particles? - It has nothing to do with homeopathy.

Waves? Nothing to do with homeopathy.

Optics? Do you want I explain how the eye detects an image? I can, but .... why?

How shall we be able to discuss? Discussion is an interchange between people who have knowledge of what they are discussing. It is not somebody asking questions they don't really understand themselves and making uninformed guesses based on the fraction of the words they understand in the answers.

Hans
 
Last edited:
How then we shall be able to discuss?
A meaningful discussion of any topic requires the participants to have some knowledge and understanding of the topic. Imparting that basic knowledge and understanding to someone who does not yet possess it is not discussion, it's teaching. This is a discussion board, not a teaching board. If you want to discuss any topic here it's your responsibility to first acquire sufficient knowledge and understanding of it to be able to participate in such a discussion.
 
Since you are suggesting it, should I take it as scientific and also such other understandings?

If you're just going to lazily phone in your replies, at least use and interesting phone.



I'm starting to suspect Kumar has me blocked.
 
I felt, at least some members do not do TTTTs. Anyway, discussions of H are already over sometimes back and shall not be prefered by me. So do not perceive it. I shall take other issues. Tks.
 
I felt, at least some members do not do TTTTs. Anyway, discussions of H are already over sometimes back and shall not be prefered by me. So do not perceive it. I shall take other issues. Tks.

Feel free not to bother!!!!!:D:D:D:D
 
When we do not know even prime ones, we lose all right to comment on anything.

As the alleged historic buddha asked "If there is an arrow sticking in someone, is it necessary to know where the arrow came from before we address the issue of the arrow?"
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom