Cont: Possible Scientific Foundations of Homeopathy, Part 2

[MRC_Hans]

Ok in english.

How force, energy and matter were PRIMARILY created? Later, such creation or destruction is not anticipated but It should had been created at prime level. Tks.

We dont know. We dont even know if they were created.
Hans

 

[Kumar]

We dont know. We dont even know if they were created.
Hans

If we do not know prime of everything it will mean, we know nothing.

 

[fagin]

Yeah right.

 

[Pixel42]

If we do not know prime of everything it will mean, we know nothing.

We know lots of things, Kumar. Many of them with a high enough degree of certainty to take them as fact. We just don't know everything.

 

[Kumar]

We dont know. We dont even know if they were created.
Hans

If we do not know, should we base it:

Cannot Naturally Be Created or Destroyed
Evidence for Creation › Evidence from Science › Evidence from the Physical Sciences › The Universe Is Stable» Next

One of most basic laws of science is the Law of the Conservation of Energy. Energy cannot be created or destroyed; it can only be changed from one form to another.

Energy is not currently being created. The universe could not have created itself using natural processes because nature did not exist before the universe came into existence. Something beyond nature must have created all the energy and matter that is observed today. Present measures of energy are immeasurably enormous, indicating a power source so great that "infinite" is the best word we have to describe it.

The logical conclusion is that our supernatural Creator with infinite power created the universe. There is no energy source capable to originate what we observe today.
http://www.icr.org/law-conservation/

 

[Kumar]

We know lots of things, Kumar. Many of them with a high enough degree of certainty to take them as fact. We just don't know everything.

But at least, "abc" you should know.

 

[Pixel42]

If we do not know, should we base it:

No, we shouldn't base it on such manifest drivel.

This looks much more plausible:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero-energy_universe

The zero-energy universe hypothesis proposes that the total amount of energy in the universe is exactly zero: its amount of positive energy in the form of matter is exactly canceled out by its negative energy in the form of gravity.[1][2]

 

[Kumar]

No, we shouldn't base it on such manifest drivel.

This looks much more plausible:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero-energy_universe

It does not tell how energy, force & matters are primarily created.

 

[Pixel42]

It does not tell how energy, force & matters are primarily created.

That's because we don't know, Kumar.

The article does explain why the claim in your quote that an infinite power source is required is wrong.

 

[Kumar]

That's because we don't know, Kumar.

The article does explain why the claim in your quote that an infinite power source is required is wrong.

When we do not know even prime ones, we lose all right to comment on anything.

 

[Mojo]

But at least, "abc" you should know.

We do. You claim that we don't, but you are wrong.

 

[Mojo]

If we do not know, should we base it:

 

[MRC_Hans]

If we do not know prime of everything it will mean, we know nothing.

Kumar that is nonsense, and you know it.

Hans

 

[halleyscomet]

It does not tell how energy, force & matters are primarily created.

The queen of the fey received a cosmic egg from a time traveling magician. He traded it for his freedom when he’d accidentally accepted a gift from her in her realm, obligating him to her.

She hatched the cosmic egg, creating our current universe. Ironically, the time traveling magician came from the universe that hatched from the egg.

Nobody knows for sure where the cosmic egg came from in the first place. The magician got it from a goblin who was being tight-lipped about where HE got it.

 

[MRC_Hans]

When we do not know even prime ones, we lose all right to comment on anything.

Really, Kumar. OK, then. I shall ask you if you know the prime of every subject you bring up, and if you dont know the prime, I shall conclude you have no right to comnent.

.....Are you sure you want to go there?

Hans

 

[halleyscomet]

When we do not know even prime ones, we lose all right to comment on anything.

Then step away from the computer. By your own logic since you do not understand how computers are manufactured and where all the component elements come from, you are not permitted to use one.

Every post you make from here on out reveals you as an ever greater hypocrite.

 

[halleyscomet]

Really, Kumar. OK, then. I shall ask you if you know the prime of every subject you bring up, and if you dont know the prime, I shall conclude you have no right to comnent.



.....Are you sure you want to go there?



Hans

He already has. By his own logic his lack of knowledge about the origin of the universe means he can say nothing about any topic. Stating his favorite color has just become a hypocritical act.

 

[Kumar]

Really, Kumar. OK, then. I shall ask you if you know the prime of every subject you bring up, and if you dont know the prime, I shall conclude you have no right to comnent.

.....Are you sure you want to go there?

Hans

I try to achieve that level, so discuss. If I shall achieve that, there may not be any need of dicussions on that. Now I shall try to find its science logically, otherwise we may have accept supernatural's existance.

 

[Kumar]

We do. You claim that we don't, but you are wrong.

If so, give awnser my question about force, energy and matter's prime creation

 

[fagin]

I try to achieve that level, so discuss. If I shall achieve that, there may not be any need of dicussions on that. Now I shall try to find its science logically, otherwise we may have accept supernatural's existance.

If so, give awnser my question about force, energy and matter's prime creation

One thing does not equal the other.