Cont: Possible Scientific Foundations of Homeopathy, Part 2

[Mojo]

Then, how we see rainbow or same rays via a prism?

Because photons of different wavelengths are refracted by different angles.

Whether spectrum of EMRs is illusionary term?

No, photons are not all of the same wavelength.

 

[Mojo]

I think, I am talking about Diffuse reflection like it:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diffuse_reflection

In it, reflected wavelengths do not form a spectrum but just travel individually in any direction not in combination with other waves.

You will still see a spectrum if you pass the light going in any particular direction through a prism.

 

[Kumar]

You will still see a spectrum if you pass the light going in any particular direction through a prism.

Does it mean a spectrum or a long wave which we see on record are just illusionary tems, not actual? Actual is just single photon which can travel in company?

 

[Pixel42]

Does it mean a spectrum or a long wave which we see on record are just illusionary tems, not actual? Actual is just single photon which can travel in company?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wave–particle_duality

 

[Mojo]

Does it mean a spectrum or a long wave which we see on record are just illusionary tems, not actual? Actual is just single photon which can travel in company?

 

[Kumar]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wave–particle_duality

How it is relevant?
Anyhow I like it in opening of above link:

"It seems as though we must use sometimes the one theory and sometimes the other, while at times we may use either. We are faced with a new kind of difficulty. We have two contradictory pictures of reality; separately neither of them fully explains the phenomena of light, but together they do.,"

 

[Kumar]

Then what?
Do they follow other, bond, travel in company or otherwise? Tell me how light and spectrum even a photo look so,?

 

[Pixel42]

How it is relevant?

It's the answer to your question, which makes it as relevant as it's possible to be.

 

[Mojo]

Then what?

Then you are wrong, as usual.

 

[Kumar]

It's the answer to your question, which makes it as relevant as it's possible to be.

Okay as you say. But I could not understand. My problem.

 

[Kumar]

Then you are wrong, as usual.

Read edited post.

 

[fagin]

How it is relevant?
Anyhow I like it in opening of above link:

"It seems as though we must use sometimes the one theory and sometimes the other, while at times we may use either. We are faced with a new kind of difficulty. We have two contradictory pictures of reality; separately neither of them fully explains the phenomena of light, but together they do.,"

Kumar, scientists, real ones, actually study things in depth.

Over the past 14 years, you have been banging on about all sorts of things, but your understanding of anything does not seem to have improved, not least your abysmal use of English.

People have suggested that you at least attempt a primary school level of science before making a fool of yourself, although over those 14 years, if you were really interested in learning, you could have obtained a proper education.

One can only assume that you are not.

Science, like mathematics and to a lesser degree English, has a very specific terminology. Certain things mean things, not whatever you interpret them to mean (generally wrongly).

May I respectfully suggest that you spend the next 14 years doing something more productive?

Perhaps sitting under that mango tree you like so much, munching mangoes, and contemplating your navel.

Because you've proved, beyond any doubt, as A&F as it gets, that you are quite incapable of learning anything about anything.

 

[Pixel42]

Okay as you say. But I could not understand. My problem.

In this case there's no reason to feel bad about that because very few people do understand quantum theory. It takes years of study to even begin to wrap your head around it.

 

[MRC_Hans]

Then what?
Do they follow other, bond, travel in company or otherwise? Tell me how light and spectrum even a photo look so,?

Photons travel in straight lines and don't interact with other photons. However, a photon is a very small unit, do any light you see under normal conditions consists of millions of photons.

Most light, even colored light, contains photons of different wavelengths.

A prism will sort the wavelenghts, so we perceive a spectrum.

Hans

 

[Kumar]

Kumar, scientists, real ones, actually study things in depth.

Long post. I felt you told something relevant. But felt sorry.

 

[Kumar]

Photons travel in straight lines and don't interact with other photons. However, a photon is a very small unit, do any light you see under normal conditions consists of millions of photons.

Most light, even colored light, contains photons of different wavelengths.

A prism will sort the wavelenghts, so we perceive a spectrum.

Hans

Thanks. It means, nothing to think, photons travel together iñ combination and all lights and spectrum has millions of independent photons. Ok?

 

[Mojo]

Read edited post.

Still nonsense.

 

[fagin]

Thanks. It means, nothing to think, photons travel together iñ combination and all lights and spectrum has millions of independent photons. Ok?

Until they stop for lunch.

 

[MRC_Hans]

Thanks. It means, nothing to think, photons travel together iñ combination and all lights and spectrum has millions of independent photons. Ok?

I'm not sure what you mean by "in combination".

Hans

 

[Peregrinus]

Thanks. It means, nothing to think, photons travel together iñ combination and all lights and spectrum has millions of independent photons. Ok?

Individual, yes; independent, no.