The article is nonsense.
He deliberately set out to shoot a human being. Whether Reeve or an intruder, that doesn't matter; he shot and shot to kill. That's what puts him behind bars. This has been explained to you a couple of dozen times already in this thread, and you choose to ignore it every time. It really must get tiring to the regulars in this thread.
Your comment is nonsense. The article is a sensible and relevent background piece on the murderer's pathological jealousy and insecurity.
Pistorius was bristling with motive.
The phone conversations were entirely consistent with a crime of passion murderer attempting to squirm out of trouble once his anger faded enough for him to realize the consequences he'd be facing. There was no accident. There was a brutal murder.
The poor devil here is Steenkamp, who had the life ripped from her by an entitled douche, while her murderer's fanboys cheer him on.
Sarcasm is an appropriate response in the face of such pathetic celebrity worship.
Pistorius is the beneficiary of a culture of hero worship perpetrated by an infantile society living their sad lives through famous people.
Nonsense. Steenkamp is the victim of an indulgent rageaholic and his fawning fanclub.
All scurrilous tabloid rubbish. The trial judge understood the facts, yes Pistorious killed, but everyone should understand that endemic fear leads to accidents.
Yes, it seems ironic that brave law enforcement officers get a leave pass to blaze away but a cripple trying to "protect" his gal is thrown to the wolves. This assuming that it was genuine mistaken identity as trial judge Masipa declared.
