So...people are fighting, and Harris took a swing at a neo-nazi?
Is there a legal definition of "fight"? The Nazi and Corey Long each have one end of the Nazi's flag, and they are engaging in a sort of tug of war.
And we're supposed to believe that he deserved to be beaten with metal poles, based on this!?
No, no, one thousand times no. I never said it. I never implied it. There is no way that can be inferred from what I, or the magistrate, have said.
The people who beat Deandre Harris were charged right away, because it was not justified to beat Deandre Harris.
The only question involved in this charge filed by the magistrate is whether it was justified for Deandre Harris to club the Nazi. Based on my observation of the film in which Mr. Harris is seen clubbing the Nazi, it does not appear justified, but there is some evidence missing. We have not heard any testimony other than a single comment made by Mr. Harris in a newspaper interview. (He said his friend, Corey Long, had been hit by the Nazi's flag. I think he said Mr. Long was "speared".) If any video exists that shows the start of the flag scuffle, I haven't seen it. It will be for a judge and/or jury to decide if Mr. Harris' claim to be defending Mr. Long is sufficient to justify the use of force against the Nazi. It seems to me, based on the incomplete evidence available, that Mr. Long could have simply let go of the Nazi's flag. However, if the Nazi had attacked Mr. Long with the flag, then a reasonable person might assume that Mr. Long was in danger, in which case Mr. Harris' attack on the Nazi would be justified.
I am sure that Mr. Harris will base his defense on defending his friend, and unless there is credible testimony to the contrary, there will be reasonable doubt, and he ought to go free.
The point of all this, really, is that the narrative propogated about this incident has been spun into unrecognizability. The narrative we are led to believe is that Deandre Harris was walking down the street when the Nazi marchers decided to attack, and they beat him while he lay on the ground.
What really happened is that Deandre Harris took a swing at a Nazi. A fight ensued. One of the Nazis was knocked to the ground, apparently unconscious, at which point two men came over and started beating the apparently unconscious Nazi. Meanwhile, a man took a swing at a Nazi, and then got pushed. He stumbled into Harris, who was knocked to the ground near the unconscious Nazi.
Some more Nazis now rushed to the aid of their unconscious ally. One of them ran right next to Mr. Harris, who started to get up. The Nazi kicks him as he runs past, knocking him back to the ground. A couple of other Nazis position themselves near their fallen ally, and another pair of Nazis come over and beat Deandre Harris on the ground.
All those who beat Mr. Harris have been charged. Now, Mr. Harris has been charged for swinging the club at the Nazi. To the best of my knowledge, none of the people who hit the unconscious Nazi have been charged.
Getting back to the point, it's remarkably the lengths that some people (and you, Meadmaker, have now entered into this realm - you should get out, now!) will go to in order to justify white supremacist violence. We've seen it before with police violence, but this random crap should stop.
There is no justification for the white supremacist violence, and it is appropriate for charges to be filed. On the other hand, it is my opinion that there is no justification for the violence against the white supremacists either. At the very least, the two men who beat the Nazi on the ground should be charged. As for Mr. Harris, it also seemed to me that his attack on the Nazi is unjustified, although I would be open to contrary evidence.